Pollutants In Cannabis

  • Thread starter jumpincactus
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
I found this interesting.

Cannabis must be free of waste products and pollutants which might pose a short or long term health risk. Plants can be exposed to several types of chemical and microbiological pollutants during the whole production process, which last from cultivation till packaging. This needs to be avoided.

articles-pollutants-in-cannabis_text_1.jpg


Chemical pollutants. Heavy metals
Some heavy metals that can be found in vegetables, and particularly in cannabis, are lead, cadmium, mercury and chromium. These metals accumulate in parts of the body, and are not easily eliminated. When certain levels of these toxins are reached, metabolic imbalances are triggered, leading to poisoning. Lead poisoning is called saturnism and is characterised by the accumulation or this metal in the blood, soft tissues and bones, causing certain physiological disorders and even death.

Not every plant can tolerate being grown with high levels of these pollutants. However, the cannabis plant is quite resistant to their influence. This feature, together with the fact that it is fast growing, has lead to the study of cannabis for phytoremediation. Phytoremediation consists in growing plants in polluted soil so that they will absorb the heavy metals and other pollutants, ending up with soil decontamination. The subsequent treatment of these plants allows for the controlled elimination of pollutants. It can be also used as raw material to manufacture certain products not intended for human consumption. The capacity cannabis has for absorbing radioactive caesium has also been demonstrated.

The accumulation of these metals in plants is due to the cultivation in contaminated soil.

Non-metal chemical pollutants: Arsenic, nitrates and nitrites
articles-contaminantes-en-cannabis_text_2.jpg

Penicillium. Image courtesy of Peter Halasz

Water contamination with arsenic is much more common than we believe. In fact, there are several areas in Spain that have water contaminated with arsenic. The most recent case has taken place in Galicia, where gold mining caused waters to be contaminated with arsenic. Gold in these mines is part of arsenopyrite, which is pulverised and cleaned to isolate the precious metal. Arsenic consumption is related to skin cancer and other ailments. Plants naturally absorb arsenic and store it in their tissues. This is the reason why it is necessary to avoid using wells or groundwater when it is not known if this element will be present in them. Soil could also be contaminated with arsenic.

Nitrites are one way for nitrogen to be present in plants. Crops demand a certain amount of nitrogen for optimum growing. When we add fertiliser with organic nitrogen, this is transformed in the soil into ammonium, nitrites and nitrates, in a process known as nitrification. Much of the nitrogen applied to our plants is absorbed as nitrates, although large amounts of ammonium and nitrites can also be absorbed.

When nitrates access our body, some of them can change into nitrites. The combination of nitrite with certain organic amine can produce substances with great carcinogenic potential, known as nitrosamines.

Biological toxins
articles-contaminantes-en-cannabis_text_3.jpg

Pink Mildew. Image courtesy
of Truman State University


Toxins of biological origin can be found within chemical organic pollutants. These are produced by microorganisms (fungi and bacteria). Some bacteria have such toxins in their cellular membrane and are known as endotoxins.

When speaking about fungi these toxins are referred to as mycotoxines and, generally, are substances segregated by these organisms.





Pesticide residues
Cannabis for consumption should not contain pesticide residues. There is the belief that observing the security time frame marked in the pesticide's packaging should be enough to avoid residues in the plant. This is not always necessarily true.

There is always a list of authorised crops in the packaging of chemical pesticides, which specifies those which the pesticide can be used on. The reason why it cannot be applied to other cultivations is the maximum limit of residues. Depending of the plant species treated with the pesticide, the final product will show different amounts of residues.

There are no studies that indicate the amount of remaining residues after having applied a certain pesticide. Therefore, there is no way of knowing how much residue we ingest. The security time frame detailed on the label does not apply to cannabis as it only applies to the products listed on the label.

Biological pollutants
Biological pollutants are those microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and yeasts) that can be found in the final product.

During cultivation, plants can develop several plant pathogens, mainly fungi. However, although these fungi only attack plant species and are not normally human pathogens, they can cause severe allergic reactions. There is a disease known as cannabinosis that is specific to those who work with hemp fibre and are constantly inhaling the particles suspended in the air. The main symptom is a serious respiratory failure. Some researches point to the microorganisms that can be found in such particles as the ones responsible for cannabinosis. Some plant pathogens produce toxins, as happens with Trichothecium roseum also known as pink mildew. A final product destined to be consumed, should contain the minimum amount of these plant pathogens.

In EEUU, a study was carried out to show what type of microorganisms could be found in the environment of indoor cannabis crops. The results showed that there were up to 100 times more spores of fungi of Penicillium genus in indoor crop environments than in outdoor ones. These fungi are mainly found in soil and substrata, however, their spores can be easily released into the environment. Although some of these fungi are use to make cheese, some others produce toxins that can cause serious health problems. Nonetheless, it was discovered that the handling of the crops for the manicure, drying, etc. caused such release of spores that could reach up to 500,000 spores per m2. The research of the study recommends using masks during the handling of the crop as such a high concentration of spores can cause allergic reactions and hypersensitivity to workers [1].

articles-contaminantes-en-cannabis_text_4.jpg

Escherichia coli

Polluting microorganisms
Escherichia coli. is a bacterium mainly found in animal intestines and excretions. Even though there are a huge number of strains which are not pathogenic, there are many others which can cause severe diseases and diarrhoea. There are also strains that produce toxins.

The fact that these strains are found in animal excretions means that it can also be found in the resulting manure, compost and fertilisers made from them. Therefore, a way of contaminating the plant is by using these type of fertilisers. It could be because the plant comes into contact with it or because, when we cut it, we place the plant in soil previously treated with contaminated manure, compost or fertilisers.

The contact with excretions coming from domestic animals such as dogs, cats and mice can also lead to contamination.

Genus Salmonella. Similarly to E. coli, they are enterobacteria found in animal excretions. There are several strains which cause serious diseases in humans. There have been cases of poisoning due to Salmonella through contaminated cannabis, as happened in EEUU, in 1981, when 85 cases of enteritis provoked by Salmonella were registered. 71% of people in these cases had been in contact with cannabis, where analysis showed positive for Salmonella munchen. [2]

Both E. coli and Salmonella are bacteria which have to reach the digestive tract in order to cause the infection. Thus, in the cases of ingestion of cannabis, the risk is immediate. To those who consume cannabis by inhalation, the main risk lies in the handling of it, i.e when the plant material is shredded to make a cigarette. In this case, the fingers are contaminated with the bacterium, so if we touch our mouth or any food afterwards, without having cleaned our hands first, there will be a high risk of infection.

articles-contaminantes-en-cannabis_text_5.jpg

Salmonella

Genus Aspergillus. These are some of the most dangerous kinds of fungi to be found. This is not just because of their capacity to grow inside the organism, but also because of the production of high power carcinogenic mycotoxins, known as aflatoxins. It is a fungus that can be found everywhere and its spores are constantly inhaled by people. In general, this is not a problem, however, when it comes to sensitive people, or people with certain pathologies that cause a weakening of the immune system, it can be the reason for a disease known as aspergillosis. This disease consists in fungus growing in the lungs and the subsequent reaction of the body covering it with cells. This produces a mass called aspergilloma, which will affect the organs.

Cases of aspergillosis in cannabis users have been reported, as the spores are easily inhaled with each inhalation. This fungus mainly affects cannabis grown in conditions with a high level of humidity, or cannabis that has been stored in an environment of high humidity and heat.
 
Seamaiden

Seamaiden

Living dead girl
23,596
638
In EEUU, a study was carried out to show what type of microorganisms could be found in the environment of indoor cannabis crops. The results showed that there were up to 100 times more spores of fungi of Penicillium genus in indoor crop environments than in outdoor ones.
Huh. I sure would like the cats who insist that ID is so much better/cleaner than OD to see this. F'real.
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
@Seamaiden I would agree with you. I believe the outside would be dirtier. However maybe the thinking is because indoors the air is more captive and you dont get a lot of wind/rains blowing that may naturally help keep things moving around. I dunnoo but the claim doesnt make sense.
 
Seamaiden

Seamaiden

Living dead girl
23,596
638
Wanna know what I think? I think the sun is cleansing. It probably disallows those fungi to get a foothold in the first place. Also, fresh air is a good thing, how many of those indoor crops were grown in sealed environments?
 
MGRox

MGRox

597
143
I think I try to take a stab as to why their results compared indoor to outdoor.

Since this was a test done in the "ag" arena, there is a good likely hood of them having used Urea. I did some research into Urea not too long ago and have a good document that's right inline with this. One of the good things with Urea is that it's toxic to fungi / pathogens.

I would wonder if Urea was used outdoor and not indoor, which is pretty common practice; then that could easily explain the variation they saw.
Here's the paper from my little nestegg of goodies. :D
LINK
"application of urea in practice can decrease the populations of a pathogen not only by the stimulation of antagonists, but also by direct toxic effect."

Urea pathogen decimation

The above pic is from the latter part of the paper. I circled Penicillium Albidum. 100% reduction with Urea @ 0.6M.

"Urea, the Pathogenic Decimator" :D:D

 
Seamaiden

Seamaiden

Living dead girl
23,596
638
I'm not sure why, but I recall a thread some years ago, maybe 10 or so, when a guy who I'm pretty sure was working for one of the nute companies at the time was getting super heated about the concept of using urea for a cannabis fertilizer. I mean he was over the fucking MOON he was so pissed off about it. I really didn't understand why, I thought urea was a component of, you know, urine. And you know how I feel about that pee!
 
MGRox

MGRox

597
143
@Seamaiden I don't have any clue why a guy working for a nute company would be hatin' on Urea :D:D Yep, about Urea and Urine.....that's where the N in Urine Comes about from, I suppose.

I can actually think of a few reason (jokes aside) for why that guy didn't care for Urea.
-Typically for the culture of these plants, high NH4 levels are not considered optimal; this being more "stressed" the closer you shift in system design towards Hydro (I.e. hydro considers a max of 10% NH4). So, part of his angst against the Urea may have been related to higher NH4 proportions.
- As well, Urea is not immediately available as a Nitrogen form and must be Catalyzed via Urease in order to become available. Part of his dislike, could have been from this. If a system were designed to be dependent on "available" N; then Urea will cause a delay before providing this. In some circumstances too, it is possible for the N provided ultimately from Urea; to be catalyzed "unevenly" (due to biological and moisture)
and to cause short-term spikes in NH4 (if not converted via bacteria to NO3).
-Since Urea requires biological activity for its' conversion; any scenarios that are not supportive of biological activity would also hamper Nitrogen availability from Urea. If conditions are too dry or in low biological activity; the Urea can build up in a medium, raising the possible risk of both N loss and NH4 toxicity.

Now on the positive side of things for Urea.
- It is the highest density of Nitrogenous compounds, compared with any other type of dry fertilizer component. It also is very cheap and easy to apply, which makes this an often used choice in agriculture.
-There can be great advantage with Crops that utilize Ureas' "delayed availability" also. When in Urea form and in a medium; it is more highly bound (less easily leeched) than either NO3 and NH4. In situations where you have high rainfall that otherwise would flush much N out of soils; Urea will not be so easily flushed and will remain in the medium for conversion to NH4 later. Another advantage of this delayed availability for crops comes about when looking at the biological activity. Biological activity will increase after moisture is raised and since the Urea isn't removed as readily; will be available for conversion to NH4. Also, Urea can be applied in colder conditions when biological function is lowered without the risk of NH4 toxicity or providing any great quantity of it's nitrogen; until conditions are warmer.

A couple of more interesting positive aspects with Urea.
- Despite being listed as potentially acidic (as is NH4); Urea will actually RAISE pH as its' catalyzed whereas NH4 will negatively impact pH. As such, higher levels of Ammonium can be run in soils with Urea as an N source vs NH4. This is mostly related to the differing pH impacts these two compounds have.
- In the process of conversion of Urea to NH4, a Carbonate is produced / released. This is the reason it raises pH vs lowering; however the advantage here is that it actually helps to add carbonates / "buffering" to soils / mediums that are most typically low in buffer capacity.
-The carbonate can also be utilized via bacteria (nitrosomonas) as a carbon source and thus can help encourage biological activity.
- The highest level of NH4 to NO3 that can be provided without toxicity is greatest when Urea is provided as the NH4 proportion, as opposed to NH4 directly.
-Last of course, is its' ability to be toxic to fungi and pathogens as pointed out above.

There are both good and bad things to consider with Urea and it can be beneficial in many applications / situations. I suppose it all depends on what is needed for the particular plants and culturing method.
Hope this helps
 
Top Bottom