PrefersHam
- 170
- 28
This idea that we have some special cultivair with special needs, is, from an Agricultural standpoint - ridiculous.
Im not a writer im a biter. well put D9.
Peace,
Ham
This idea that we have some special cultivair with special needs, is, from an Agricultural standpoint - ridiculous.
Do you know a good place for water testing?Are you running your top off hot or with tap and at what ph is your top off? How high is your water level in your UC? You said you have nice white roots, are the bottom and lower sides of your net pot fillled out or do you have pop out roots that are giving a nice mass lower than the net pots? Also, at what temps do you run your water at? Just some questions to knock around a few thoughts I'm having.. Have you found a spot to have your water tested yet, I know you were wanting one..
That is "plants," which is a common way to approach any plant in the AG industry.
This idea that we have some special cultivair with special needs, is, from an Agricultural standpoint - ridiculous.
Very well put Squiggly.While this is for the most part true I think it's important to not lose the nuance of feeding different phenotypes differently.
Metabolism is different in each plant, even to some degree in clones--but certainly between different phenotypes.
For instance, if my brother were to eat the way I do he would be a very VERY fat man. He is a mesomorph and will put on the pounds with no problem.
I, on the other hand, am an ectomorph--and I can eat until the cows come home, and then I can eat the cows, and I won't gain a fucking pound.
135 every day since age 16 (except when I was bulking for sports in high school--6 months post high school after 4 years of gaining weight I was back to 135).
Of course there is a bit more variability in humans because we have so many organ systems and they are interconnected. Plants are significantly more simple and that's why I say that it is mostly true what Quantum said here.
A big part of what keeps MJ growers the laughing stock of the AG world is failure to realize this very simple notion.
At the same time, we shouldn't lose sight that individuals will have different needs based on their genetics--but these won't have such variability that it renders these common values useless.
Well some plants don't have a flowering/fruiting process, but yeah, I am referring specifically to cannabis because that is what I grow, you can get nutrients specifically for orchids at lowes, or veggies, like tomatoes.
So my question wasn't about the special needs of cannabis, just if the total uptake/tissue sample would be inaccurate during the flowering process because the buds would need different nutrients.
I think during the veg process it would be fairly accurate.
Yeah, during stretch.
Nope. The whole time.
Nope. The whole time.
Q9 where art thou?:(Nope. The whole time.
Can I just hire a goddamn team of scientists to carry out these different tests for me and take tissue samples? Lol its pretty much impossible to tell what to do anymore... "No n during flower, no wait, n all the way thru." Wtf?!?! Seriously squiggs and quantum, what's the best way to actually scientifically find out what the plant actually needs or wants or what is useful or what hurts?????? I just today had a discussion w my partner about using whey protein in teas. Had to reference woodsmanehs posts bcuz he was ready to quit after capulator laughed at him.
Sounds legitimate. U been subscribing to the jalisco kid bible too eh?Wish I had a team of scientists, but thats not gonna happen :( There are so many different opinions out there I'm just going with what works for me and my plants in my garden.
Leaf tissue analysis shows whats in the leaf, not the bud, just like a stem analysis will be different then the leaf. I'm keeping the nutes the same throughout most of flower and boosting PK 3 times, lower N and Ca after week 5 and raise Mg and S, thats on an 8 week strain. If the leaves stay green then they have enough N, right?!?
Sounds legitimate. U been subscribing to the jalisco kid bible too eh?
i hate the undercurrent i gave to many problems