Grownsince95 said:

Three things:

1. If the camera was in the tent with the light on the whole time the plants are not going to be normal for six weeks than all of a sudden re veg.

2. "Guessing" on things like this will just give you confirmation bias.

3. You have three other plants telling you the camera is not the problem.

As a business owner I feel obligated to remind people to do their homework before they make public claims about a product. You could really be hurting someone's livelihood when you're just trying to do the right thing and help fellow growers.

Call the company and find out how many nm that light is. If it's throwing par light your wyze cam should be able to pick that up too I use the same one.

Click to expand...

Grownsince95 said:

Three things:

1. If the camera was in the tent with the light on the whole time the plants are not going to be normal for six weeks than all of a sudden re veg.

2. "Guessing" on things like this will just give you confirmation bias.

3. You have three other plants telling you the camera is not the problem.

As a business owner I feel obligated to remind people to do their homework before they make public claims about a product. You could really be hurting someone's livelihood when you're just trying to do the right thing and help fellow growers.

Call the company and find out how many nm that light is. If it's throwing par light your wyze cam should be able to pick that up too I use the same one.

Click to expand...

Grownsince95 said:

What does it look like through the wyze cam?

I guess the plant closest to the light re vegged?

How many umols on the par meter?

Click to expand...

Grownsince95 said:

Three things:

1. If the camera was in the tent with the light on the whole time the plants are not going to be normal for six weeks than all of a sudden re veg.

2. "Guessing" on things like this will just give you confirmation bias.

3. You have three other plants telling you the camera is not the problem.

As a business owner I feel obligated to remind people to do their homework before they make public claims about a product. You could really be hurting someone's livelihood when you're just trying to do the right thing and help fellow growers.

Call the company and find out how many nm that light is. If it's throwing par light your wyze cam should be able to pick that up too I use the same one.

Click to expand...

Grownsince95 said:

What does it look like through the wyze cam?

I guess the plant closest to the light re vegged?

How many umols on the par meter?

Click to expand...

Ninjadogma said:

I don't think a single diode could do that but if there's a ring of them around the lens I'd be curious to see what it reads. I don't think phone cameras can typically "detect" IR in order to use the Photone app but if you point your camera at an IR light it will look purple even when you don't see it with your naked eye. If you ever want to check the batteries on your TV remote you can press the power button with your camera on and you'll see it glow purple.

I've read that it takes a minimum of 5 umols of light energy for cannabis to react to light. The moon is something like 1 umol during a full moon which is why it doesn't trigger reveg. I use my shed for dark period during the day. I've closed the door and stood in there to check it and it definitely leaks at the seams of the door as well as a seam under the roof overhang but its still dark enough to trigger a plant to flower. If that Haze leans heavy into its Sativa genetics it could be extra photosensitive.

Click to expand...

mitchimal said:

So recently I noticed my week 6 flower GHS Haze #3 started to reveg which broke my heart cause that pheno was going gang busters.. What I found was my Tap C210 (V1.0) wi-fi camera in the room was putting out PAR reactive red instead of its advertised 850nm IR. So this is more a PSA to help anyone searching for any info regarding re veg in flower. I actually have 2 cameras in there, a Wyze V4 camera which is fantastic and the Tapo. What I found was the image was pink on camera when the IR was on. I'm guessing they're using 750nm LEDs instead. There aren't any settings to even turn IR on or off so the camera went in the bin.
Hopefully I can salvage the plant. The strange part is, there are 3 other plants next to this one that didn't react at all...

Click to expand...

mitchimal said:

also I did say it's "advertised 850nm" from it's spec sheet

Click to expand...

Mikedin said:

they use 750’s? I run wyze cam V3’s and they use 850’s and 940’s (can chose between near and far IR settings to swap between them)

But mine never come out of my tents I let the plants grow right up to em sometimes but I usually run em in time laspe when I’m actually usin them

Was the plant the one the camera was pointing directly at and the closest? And were you recording 24/7 or time lapse?

Click to expand...

Ninjadogma said:

I don't think a single diode could do that but if there's a ring of them around the lens I'd be curious to see what it reads. I don't think phone cameras can typically "detect" IR in order to use the Photone app but if you point your camera at an IR light it will look purple even when you don't see it with your naked eye. If you ever want to check the batteries on your TV remote you can press the power button with your camera on and you'll see it glow purple.

I've read that it takes a minimum of 5 umols of light energy for cannabis to react to light. The moon is something like 1 umol during a full moon which is why it doesn't trigger reveg. I use my shed for dark period during the day. I've closed the door and stood in there to check it and it definitely leaks at the seams of the door as well as a seam under the roof overhang but its still dark enough to trigger a plant to flower. If that Haze leans heavy into its Sativa genetics it could be extra photosensitive.

Click to expand...

mitchimal said:

On the Tapo it looked normal but the wyze was picking up the pink, pretty sure it has a much better sensor. Yeah one of the re veg branches was right next to it. The weird part is, that branch isn't showing re veg symptoms but it's branches further away are. I don't remember what reading it was but I'll check it again out of the room today. All the automation gear is out of the room so there's zero chance of light leaks from anything else. I'm frustrated at myself I didnt think harder about the pink image before the issue. I had just put it down to the the cameras stream not working properly. I had the Tapo only in there cause I could use it's RTSP stream through my automation system so I could watch it live and control everything in one place.

Click to expand...

KG1 said:

To restart negative growth or photosynthesis needs a certain par level otherwise the moon would play havoc with our outdoor flowering times.

Your plant looks foxtailed to hell, it's not revegging it's stressed.

Click to expand...

KG1 said:

To restart negative growth or photosynthesis needs a certain par level otherwise the moon would play havoc with our outdoor flowering times.

Your plant looks foxtailed to hell, it's not revegging it's stressed.

Click to expand...

mitchimal said:

Just had a look through posts related to fox tailing, you're absolutely right! Very grateful, is it too late for it to stop getting worse? Will the buds thicken up once the stress has been removed? Also would this stress mean it will add flowering time before they're finished?
Cheers

Click to expand...

mitchimal said:

Two phenos from the same seeds but very different.. right next to each other. You can see the green shoots coming from the buds and no swelling anywhere on the effected plant

Click to expand...

KG1 said:

Maybe probably not, I think the point is it's not really vegging.

Click to expand...