Rise In Drug Use Tied To Relaxed View Toward Pot (NPR Colorado Content)

  • Thread starter pollenchucker
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
pollenchucker

pollenchucker

99
8
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129930970&ft=1&f=1001

comments at that page, too

September 17, 2010
Marijuana advocates have been arguing for years that pot is not only harmless but has beneficial qualities. Such claims are having an effect.

Fewer than half of Americans think marijuana should be legalized — but just barely half. The most recent Gallup and CBS News polls on this topic both show that 44 percent favor legalization. Compare that with roughly 25 percent in favor from the late 1970s into the mid-1990s.

The change in attitude toward pot shows up not only in polls, but in use. A survey released Thursday by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration showed that use of illegal drugs rose last year to the highest levels in nearly a decade. Marijuana use was most prevalent, but ecstasy and methamphetamine posted gains, too.

Web Resources
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administraton's 'National Survey On Drug Use & Health'
Drug policy experts say this reflects changes in the perceived risks of taking drugs — both of being caught and of suffering societal disapproval. A California initiative to legalize marijuana this November would amplify this effect if it passes.

"There is such a push on the part of the marijuana lobby to soften up the public," says Eric Voth, a physician who chairs the Institute on Global Drug Policy, an anti-drug alliance of physicians, scientists and attorneys. "The perception of harm has dropped. You saw this increase in pot first and now you're seeing this increase in ecstasy and meth."

Taking It To The States

Fourteen states and the District of Columbia allow people to use marijuana for medical purposes, such as improving the appetite of cancer and AIDS patients.

"What people are responding to is the realization that the government has been lying for decades and that marijuana is less harmful than legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco," says Mike Meno, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project, which favors legalization.

Map: Medical Marijuana Laws By State
Medical marijuana has become big business. Americans are spending $25 billion a year on marijuana, according to Harvard University economist Jeffrey Miron. The number of patients and licensed dispensers has doubled over the past year in Rhode Island alone. In July, the Oakland City Council approved construction of four industrial-sized marijuana factories.

Last month, the Boulder County SWAT team destroyed 7,500 marijuana plants — about five football fields' worth. But medical marijuana remains a growth industry in Colorado. Next week, doctors, dispensers and marketing experts will gather at a downtown Denver hotel for the Plant Medicine Expo & Healthcare Provider Conference.

"It's way beyond legalizing," Voth says. "The medical excuse opened the door."

What Goes Down Must Come Up

Voth and other drug war veterans say they've seen this all before. During the 1970s, about a dozen states decriminalized marijuana. Eventually, the era's spike in drug use — particularly cocaine — prompted harsher laws under the Reagan administration and a parents' movement that forced a crackdown.

Use of marijuana and other illegal drugs reached their peak in the late 1970s. In 1979, 1 out of every 3 high school seniors was smoking dope on a regular basis, according to Herbert Kleber, a Columbia University psychiatrist who served as deputy drug "czar" under President George H.W. Bush.

That number dropped markedly during the early 1990s. With people witnessing fewer ill effects due to diminished drug use, it started to seem safe again to indulge. Drug use is still nowhere near the levels of the 1970s, but the latest figures mark a reversal nonetheless.

"It's not so much that the rise is so great as that it contrasts with the long period of decline," says Lloyd Johnston, a social psychologist at the University of Michigan. "Clearly that decade of improvement has come to a halt."

Changes In Attitude

Those who oppose recreational use of marijuana blame the well-organized and funded campaign to normalize it. "Attitudes for all kinds of reasons have been softening about the risks and dangers of marijuana," says John Carnevale, an economist and drug policy consultant who has worked on the issue during both Republican and Democratic administrations, including those of presidents Clinton and Reagan.

Drugs that enjoy a patina of medical approval — whether marijuana or prescription drugs such as OxyContin, which has seen enormous growth in recreational use — seem safe, or at least safer than street drugs. If doctors prescribe them, how bad can they be?

"The idea that smoking is medicine is an indicator in the minds of young users that this is not harmful," Carnevale says.

Patients get their prescriptions filled at Sunset Junction medical marijuana dispensary on May 11 in Los Angeles.

Looking To California

California voters, who approved a pioneering medical marijuana initiative in 1996, will soon decide whether to legalize marijuana altogether. November's Proposition 19 has not yet attracted the same number of wealthy out-of-state backers, such as financier George Soros, as the earlier initiative.

But it has garnered support from a number of state and local officials, eager for the billions in tax revenues that legalized pot promises to generate. On Monday, the Service Employees International Union's California State Council — one of the biggest public employee unions in the state — endorsed Proposition 19.

Polls indicate the proposition has roughly a 50-50 chance of passing. Both marijuana advocates and opponents agree that passage would have an enormous impact, with other states likely to follow suit and the drug becoming more readily available to young people.

"If California were to pass Proposition 19, it would be revolutionary," says Meno, the Marijuana Policy Project spokesman. "People would see that the sky doesn't fall, the police will have more resources to fight crimes and there will be more revenues for local budgets."

Future Growth — Or Backlash

It's not clear how the Obama administration, which announced last year that it would end the Bush administration policy of routinely raiding medical marijuana dispensaries, would react to outright legalization in one state. Every former chief of the Drug Enforcement Administration has called on Attorney General Eric Holder to oppose the initiative.

"I don't expect [to see] us returning to a drug war hysteria under an Obama administration," says Miron, the Harvard economist. But, he adds, "If Proposition 19 passes, some Republicans will get energized and demand that there's a federal response. The Obama administration will be in a pickle if that happens. They don't want to be fighting over that issue, but they don't want to be seen as too much in the pro-drug camp."

Robert L. DuPont, president of the Institute for Behavior and Health, says that regardless of the outcome in California, marijuana advocates have "already won" by shifting the terms of debate and increasing acceptance of drug use. He predicts that illegal drug use will continue to rise.

But DuPont, who served as a top drug policy official under Presidents Nixon, Ford and Carter, also predicts that increasing use will, in time, bring tolerance to an end. "I'm confident these folks have created the reaction that will stop them," he says. "The data's going to get worse in coming years and that's going to re-create the bipartisan opposition to illegal drug use that we saw between 1979 and 1991."
 
Green Mopho

Green Mopho

1,056
83
"There is such a push on the part of the marijuana lobby to soften up the public," says Eric Voth, a physician who chairs the Institute on Global Drug Policy, an anti-drug alliance of physicians, scientists and attorneys. "The perception of harm has dropped. You saw this increase in pot first and now you're seeing this increase in ecstasy and meth."

And where is the established link between marijuana use and ecstasy and meth use? How about establishing a link between ecstasy/meth use and prescription drug use? And what about the established link with marijuana enforcement and private prisons?

How about doing an unbiased study establishing a link between legal drug use, i.e. prescriptions, alcohol, and tobacco with hard drug use, leaving marijuana out of it? But that won't ever happen...Marijuana will always be at the CENTER of these arguments as the primary "evil doer"!

Voth and other drug war veterans say they've seen this all before. During the 1970s, about a dozen states decriminalized marijuana. Eventually, the era's spike in drug use — particularly cocaine — prompted harsher laws under the Reagan administration and a parents' movement that forced a crackdown.

And the CIA and FBI were smuggling cocaine into America, to add fuel to a fire, so legislation could get pushed through for harsher drug laws under Reagan. It wasn't about pot, it was about lumping pot in with all other drugs and arresting people to fill up prisons.

Use of marijuana and other illegal drugs reached their peak in the late 1970s. In 1979, 1 out of every 3 high school seniors was smoking dope on a regular basis, according to Herbert Kleber, a Columbia University psychiatrist who served as deputy drug "czar" under President George H.W. Bush.

1 out of 3 high school seniors were smoking pot in the 70s, and where are they now? Probably dead or addicted to meth, right? Nope, they are our mailmen, our teachers, our engineers, our road workers, our mechanics, etc. They turned out fine, except for maybe a few run ins with the law over the years....

That number dropped markedly during the early 1990s.

Thats around the time doctors started shoving Prozac and Riddlin into you and your kids in an effort to dominate the market and find a commercially viable substitute for pot, and to sedate the masses...

Drugs that enjoy a patina of medical approval — whether marijuana or prescription drugs such as OxyContin, which has seen enormous growth in recreational use — seem safe, or at least safer than street drugs. If doctors prescribe them, how bad can they be?

The same old trickery, double standard...talk about how prescription drugs can be dangerous and only doctors can prescribe them for that reason----> Therefore medical marijuana is just as dangerous as oxycotin, since you need a doctor's prescription for it, right? Kids are abusing OxyCotins everywhere and therefore there will be tons of abuse with medical marijuana. They are missing the main arguement that marijuana is a medicinal herb, not a manufactured DRUG!

Robert L. DuPont, president of the Institute for Behavior and Health, says that regardless of the outcome in California, marijuana advocates have "already won" by shifting the terms of debate and increasing acceptance of drug use. He predicts that illegal drug use will continue to rise.

Once again, there in no established link between hard drugs and marijuana use, but it is automatically assumed.

Most marijuana is produced in the USA, most other hard drugs, including cocaine and heroine are produced in third world countries. There isn't even an established link as to the source or the destination of these drugs...the ONLY established link between hard drugs and marijuana is prohibition!

But DuPont, who served as a top drug policy official under Presidents Nixon, Ford and Carter, also predicts that increasing use will, in time, bring tolerance to an end. "I'm confident these folks have created the reaction that will stop them," he says. "The data's going to get worse in coming years and that's going to re-create the bipartisan opposition to illegal drug use that we saw between 1979 and 1991."

Yea, when the next R. president gets elected, they will soon release another "dummy" drug out there on the streets in an effort to curb all drug use. The media will create a storm of the dangers of these new street drugs, and there will be more hardcore drug policy reform and enforcement to sweep us all up...paid for by the private prison industry!

The title of the article is "Rise In Drug Use Tied To Relaxed View Toward Pot", yet no where in the article do they manage to use any facts to "tie" the rise in drug use to a relaxed view toward pot....propaganda is all this is....

Just because there has been a rise in meth/ecstasy use AND a more relaxed attitude towards pot, doesn't mean there is a link between the two. Maybe its just a coincidence....

Thats like saying, without any factual evidence, that a rise in bread sales results in people eating more rice...

How about a study as to how dreary and boring middle class slavery is in America that we have to resort ourselves to a plethora of drugs, both illegal and legal. Where does the demand for any of these drugs come from? How many people can't make it through a work day without downing tons of coffee just to stay focused on the boring work they are doing? How many people can't make it through a work week without having to go out on Friday night and get hammered at a bar to forget all the work bullshit they had to deal with? How many people can deal with depression and life's perpetual ailments without a little help from their doctor?
 
K

kuz

678
63
Yes, those high schoolers from the 70's are doing pretty good today, unless they got too much into alcohol, meth, coke, heroin, pain pills, etc. Honestly cant think of anyone that destroyed their life with cannabis.

The same dealers that supplied us pot in 7th grade, brought us cocaine later on, so in that way its related. We are okay as long as dispensaries dont start selling crack.
 
Green Mopho

Green Mopho

1,056
83
And don't you find it interesting that Robert L. DuPont is the head of the Institute for Behavior and Health, but he happens to have the same last name of one of the largest chemical manufactures in the world that Jack Herer attributed the modern criminalization of marijuana to, due to the industrial threat of hemp?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States#DuPont.2C_William_Randolph_Hearst.2C_and_hemp

Cannabis activist Jack Herer has researched DuPont and in his 1985 book The Emperor Wears No Clothes, Herer concluded DuPont played a large role in the criminalization of marijuana cannabis. In 1938, DuPont patented the processes for creating plastics from coal and oil and a new process for creating paper from wood pulp. If hemp had been largely exploited, Herer believes it would have likely been used to make paper and plastic (nylon), and may have hurt DuPont's profits. Andrew Mellon of the Mellon Bank was DuPont's chief financial backer and was also the Secretary of the Treasury under the Hoover administration. Mellon appointed Harry J. Anslinger, who later became his nephew-in-law, as the head of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (FBNDD) and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN), where Anslinger stayed until 1962.[23]
 
S

SoCoMMJ

313
28
The same dealers that supplied us pot in 7th grade, brought us cocaine later on, so in that way its related. We are okay as long as dispensaries dont start selling crack.

Yep, and that's exactly why legalization will diminish use of other illegal drugs.
 
Top Bottom