chickenman
Premium Member
Supporter
- 10,698
- 438
[YOUTUBE]-c_iQqnpgbY[/YOUTUBE]
Ok, I have said this before and I will say it again, Ron Paul is not really on our side, and he would not be good for this country. If you think the republicans have blocked Obama from doing anything they will be twice as bad if Ron Paul were president. I know he is technically a Republican, but not really, he does not follow the GOP line of Republicans. Ron Paul is for making money and that is about it. So since 75% of the jails are private in the good ole US of A they would need to make money too, and the way they do that is by putting people in jail. Don't be fooled by the few good things that come out of Ron Paul's mouth, there are two more bad ideas to follow it. I also happen to think he is border line crazy.
Show me someone better, Mitt, Newt, Obamma..WTF?
Mitt and Newt scare the shit out of me...
All of them are about making money Mitt is the biggest piece of shit there is and Newt, give me a break, how could peeps be so stupid...
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to chickenman again.
Hey its ok...Everybodys got there views, as long as we can discuss without bashing each other lets get it on,,,,,
Show me someone better, Mitt, Newt, Obamma..WTF?
Mitt and Newt scare the shit out of me...
All of them are about making money Mitt is the biggest piece of shit there is and Newt, give me a break, how could peeps be so stupid...
Seriously? Do you know who some of the sponsors of SOPA are? Have you bothered to take a look at the PATRIOT vote role calls, like, ever? If you have, you'd have to notice how many Democrats have voted in favor of legislation typically blamed on Republicans. Btw, the sponsors of SOPA (and, IIRC perhaps PIPA as well) are my state's own (democrat) senators, Boxer and Feinstein.
Republicrat, demoplican, they represent nothing more than two legs of the same, chimeric, corporatized, corrupt beast. It matters not which holds what office, especially if one bases their opinion on facts that can be backed up, such as voting records. Obama's actions are coming as no surprise to me, that much is certain, nor am I foolish enough to believe that by simply changing the balance in the houses from Republican to Democrat that we might see less of what's happening--incredible infringements upon our rights and corruption of not only our Constitution, but Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence.
Even though I object to Paul's stance on DoMA and abortion, I feel he's the best representative of and for me. The others? Definitely, not so much. Plus, they like to consider themselves my 'leaders' and that rankles me. Paul has yet to do anything other than what he says he's going to do. He's maintained a far higher degree of integrity than damn near anyone else who's served during his time, or still serves.
And let me say this--I was watching the first debate in S.C. I was ASTONISHED when Gingrich invoked Andrew Jackson as a president to emulate. Just completely fucking astonished. And appalled.
Seriously? Do you know who some of the sponsors of SOPA are? Have you bothered to take a look at the PATRIOT vote role calls, like, ever? If you have, you'd have to notice how many Democrats have voted in favor of legislation typically blamed on Republicans. Btw, the sponsors of SOPA (and, IIRC perhaps PIPA as well) are my state's own (democrat) senators, Boxer and Feinstein.
Republicrat, demoplican, they represent nothing more than two legs of the same, chimeric, corporatized, corrupt beast. It matters not which holds what office, especially if one bases their opinion on facts that can be backed up, such as voting records. Obama's actions are coming as no surprise to me, that much is certain, nor am I foolish enough to believe that by simply changing the balance in the houses from Republican to Democrat that we might see less of what's happening--incredible infringements upon our rights and corruption of not only our Constitution, but Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence.
Even though I object to Paul's stance on DoMA and abortion, I feel he's the best representative of and for me. The others? Definitely, not so much. Plus, they like to consider themselves my 'leaders' and that rankles me. Paul has yet to do anything other than what he says he's going to do. He's maintained a far higher degree of integrity than damn near anyone else who's served during his time, or still serves.
And let me say this--I was watching the first debate in S.C. I was ASTONISHED when Gingrich invoked Andrew Jackson as a president to emulate. Just completely fucking astonished. And appalled.
Ron Paul is for making money and that is about it.
:sign0023:
Why don't you back that up w/ some evidence.
RP has refused to take part in the sweetheart congressional pension plan and has more integrity that just about anyone in DC. He's one of the few guys who consistently defends Liberty, individual rights and the Constitution. He's also written 6 books on economics and correctly predicted the housing bubble and our financial crisis. Nanny staters on the Left and nanny staters on the right all want to control EVERYTHING, including your MJ use, but not RP. He opposes the war on drugs and creeping totalitarianism.