Tylerm1712
- Posts
- 100
- Reactions
- 115
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2021
- Points
- 43
So would you say prob only way to effect $ per sqft would be raising temp, nutes and co2. Besides that it could always be worse but never really better then the avarage gram per watt. I'm just wondering if adding more plants with out more light to my tent... since I have space will increase my over all yield or will it just take away from the other plants.Sort of. It's more complicated than that, but it often seems so.
Yes. There are variables but all else being set correctly, light is the main factor.So would you say prob only way to effect $ per sqft would be raising temp, nutes and co2. Besides that it could always be worse but never really better then the avarage gram per watt. I'm just wondering if adding more plants with out more light to my tent... since I have space will increase my over all yield or will it just take away from the other plants.
I wish I had a meter, might have to get one. So at what number would you say ur wasting ur time or pointless. Anything under 1000m/mols at the canopy isnt worth the product. So if the opposite corner of my tent is only receiving 300m/mols is it worth throwing a pot there.Yes. There are variables but all else being set correctly, light is the main factor.
You are only producing X amount of photonic energy. The plants will absorb all they can, but how do you redirect lost photons?In a tent, it's reflective and that helps a lot but its still not perfect. The more light you can give without burning or stressing the plants will work toward your yield. to a point. Saturation calls for additional space for more plants.
It will still grow, just not as robustly. We have 4 plants in a 4x4 and a 2x4. When you train and top, you will have more than enough bud sites. It's how much light can you put down evenly on them. Our tents have 2 of each light so that we fill the tent and we can use less power and still have more light.I wish I had a meter, might have to get one. So at what number would you say ur wasting ur time or pointless. Anything under 1000m/mols at the canopy isnt worth the product. So if the opposite corner of my tent is only receiving 300m/mols is it worth throwing a pot there.
Who says you need 1000ppfd to grow good buds? My buds never get anywhere close to that. This was around 600ppfdI wish I had a meter, might have to get one. So at what number would you say ur wasting ur time or pointless. Anything under 1000m/mols at the canopy isnt worth the product. So if the opposite corner of my tent is only receiving 300m/mols is it worth throwing a pot there.
I’d say square canopy ft and wattage play the biggest role and are the general rule of thumb here, at least in my experience. I run 4 dbl end hps lights and used to run 34 plants and usually do about 2-2.5lbs per light. My latest grow, I added four small LEDs (150w each or 600 watts extra) in the middle of the room where the DEs over lap and added an extra row of 5 plants so 39 total and I did a little over 12.5lbs. Same canopy size, just 600 watts more and 5 more plants and I also flipped them smaller so there was a lot less larf at the bottom.So is it true that It doesn't matter how many plants u put in a space your limited to gram per watt at it's best.
So if I have 7 plants under a 650w mars hydro bar style light and let's say on avarage there 100grams a plant i add another 2 plants would they just steal usuable par/photosynthesis from the other 7plants or could i expect 900grams overall
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?