i saw that documentary on the corn your talking about. and that is scary shit! i also understand the relationships with governments and corporations being very beneficial for each other. I also realize that courts always decide in favor of corps over people in all those farmer cases and we all know that is completely fucked. and the patenting of living things??? thats just insane and i cannot believe (well of course i can) that the federal courts made that decision. we all know the government is going for total control using the corporations as there army. i understand that. and yeah people with guns taking there shit back is more then likely the way its going to unravel, just as it has every other time a people is getting screwed by a govt thought history.
im just saying this bill states that it will be regulated like alcohol, but not federally, as with alcohol you may need some federal authorization, here is the quote from ABC, calis alcohol dept.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Before opening an alcoholic beverage business, the applicant should contact the nearest office of the United States Treasury Department, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. If a Federal basic permit or a special Occupational Tax Stamp is required, it should be applied for by and issued to the same persons applying for a license with this department and at the same address.
if your distilling you have to register with the fda, and National Revenue Center (NRC)
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. get an EIN with the irs, and thats about it. nothing a lawyer couldnt draw up pretty easily. and in 95 days you are distilling whisky or vodka or whatever liquor you want. you are now part of big alcohol and it wasnt that hard. and thats with federal regulation.
i know non of us want to deal with the above so read on....
Keep in mind that this bill is not a federal one, its a state bill. so as it is now, there isnt any federal oversight on medical marijuana, first off, because legally they (the feds) cant oversee a schedule 1 drug, its illegal for them to do so( i can find that info if i need to). and thats what our non toxic herb is classified as, as you all well know. thats a fact bros they can not regulate a schedule 1 substance!. and that means, obviously, nothing less then no federal regs. which is what we should really be scared of, federal regulatory shit. thats when i will start voting no! this isnt a federal legalization bill yall. i would definatly say fuck all that if it were.
does that kinda clear where im coming from? oh below is the fee schedule for distilling in washington.
this is state control of alcohol in washington:
check out what info they ask on the application. all they want to know is who you are, where you are, what your doing, how much your making, and how many employees you have, owe yeah and there licensing fees that i must say seem pretty reasonable.
RCW 66.24.140
Distiller's license — Fee.
There shall be a license to distillers, including blending, rectifying and bottling; fee two thousand dollars per annum, unless provided otherwise as follows:
(1) For distillers producing twenty thousand gallons or less of spirits with at least half of the raw materials used in the production grown in Washington, the license fee shall be reduced to one hundred dollars per annum;
(2) The board shall license stills used and to be used solely and only by a commercial chemist for laboratory purposes, and not for the manufacture of liquor for sale, at a fee of twenty dollars per annum;
(3) The board shall license stills used and to be used solely and only for laboratory purposes in any school, college or educational institution in the state, without fee; and
(4) The board shall license stills which shall have been duly licensed as fruit and/or wine distilleries by the federal government, used and to be used solely as fruit and/or wine distilleries in the production of fruit brandy and wine spirits, at a fee of two hundred dollars per annum.
[2008 c 94 § 1; 1981 1st ex.s. c 5 § 28; 1937 c 217 § 1 (23D) (adding new section 23-D to 1933 ex.s. c 62); RRS § 7306-23D.]
Notes:
Severability -- Effective date -- 1981 1st ex.s. c 5: See RCW 66.98.090 and 66.98.100.
i just used washington as an example because there info was the first i found.