Lazerus00
- Posts
- 2,030
- Reactions
- 4,469
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
- Points
- 263
i would assume they both do but i never asked so the prollly dontIn my opinion there just 2 diffrent color Apple's. Both good. Does either come with a dome?
121,123 growers, practical cultivation threads, real grow diaries, and community advice.
Create account → Already a member? Log inFollow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i would assume they both do but i never asked so the prollly dontIn my opinion there just 2 diffrent color Apple's. Both good. Does either come with a dome?
This is actually the way I'm cloning now is in rockwool and tray with dome and it's works 98% , imo best cloning technique.I have a ez cloner and I went back to rock wool cubes and the dome. I seem to do better that way. I'll leave dome completely sealed for the 1st 72 hours and then crack the little circles on top after that and I get 100% by day 7-8 9/10 I put clones in there. Never less than 90% success rate
any reason you use rockwool instead of the rapid rooter plugs?This is actually the way I'm cloning now is in rockwool and tray with dome and it's works 98% , imo best cloning technique.
Wow bro!! Always drropping that super knowledg!! I love it! Your like the resident encylepedia along with @SeaF0ur and a bunch of you others that im too lazy to list...lolY'all respond too fast!! I slowly put this together while on the phone and doin' duties; sorry I'm late.
@Lazerus00 I would be curious to hear from someone that has used the clone king, as it's quite a bit cheaper. I wonder if there's a difference in the spray pattern of the nozzles vs the two. The fan feature with the turbocloner is welcome indeed. I'd have a little concern with the pump included in the clone king and possibly would replace it; if I had one.
Setting aside any names or specific setups, we can still "lump" cloning processes into a few categories; "Bare root vs root in medium" and "dome vs no dome".
Personally and easiest; I tend to prefer a "no dome" method of cloning vs a dome. Here it just boils down to (I feel), less chance of total possible issues without a dome than with.
Looking at bare root vs root in medium, the differences and / or benefits falls into a more gray area. With bare root, I've done a "spinner" (forget name brand), ultrasonic fogging, dwc bubbler and turbo cloner. With root in medium; I've done potting soil, peat moss, coir, perlite and jiffy pellets (I know of another who has used the rapid rooters some). Personally for me, I consider that root in medium methods offer more "buffer" to variation and incidence than does a bare root method. However, visibly seeing root development and (in certain cases) faster or more robust rooting; tends to be more of the advantages offered via bare root.
I've never used the rapid rooters, but know one who did for a bit and they are pretty sweet for sure. Since I do perpetual and is easiest for me to get those local; I would pay for a turbo cloner in appx 1 year buying those. The ONLY reason I haven't used them is cost....but I'm cheap. For a root in medium method and cost aside; I'd defo be lookin at those.
From the bare root perspective I still feel that the fogger was the best in that arena though I got sick of replacing the fogger every few months. Specifically with the turbo cloner I'm still in testing mode with it and have only been usin it a couple months. I needed to make another bubble / medium unit but was lazy, so I thought I would try the turbo. I adjust the water temperature via the pump timing. Though I'm working on a mod to automate this relative to stem moisture. One interesting thing with the turbo cloner, for me, will be that it has to be running all the time and always has cuts of varying progress to rooting. So, I'm interested to see how this plays out long-term.
just giving out some thoughts or things that I consider here, not trying to lean you one way or another.