squiggly
- 3,277
- 263
I feel you on the instinct level.
My big problem is that I know how the brain works more or less when it comes to crap like this (better than I want to). I actually know less about this kind of stuff (politics, econ, philo, logic, etc) BY FAR than I know about how the brain likes to organize stuff like this--and I am no fucking slouch in those areas (though still far from expert)
I'm as "uneducated" as you when it comes to this stuff--in fact--and that's what I meant (not that you need to school to talk with me, that'd be terrible).
Long story short as possible (since I just went off on a diatribe): the brain likes resolution--if there isn't any, it will manufacture it.
It has to do with how our memories are stored and how we perceive new information.
The brain is constantly filtering material (like a REALLY REALLY ADVANCED "importance separator"). Things that are unimportant, or the brain thinks are unimportant right then--literally fall straight through.
I mean that literally. They are gone not fuzzy. They were never committed to memory. This is part of why eyewitness testimony is shit. The brains ABHORS a vacuum. I wish there was a better word. There needs to be a stronger one.
If your brain could talk, it would talk all day about what a cunt an incomplete memory is. ALL DAY.
Whatever was filtered out must be "assumed" by your brain. Drumming up a memory is intense on-the-fly rendering of the experience itself--but because your brain doesnt download every pixel and sound as it has the experience, in order to reconstruct it it must take some "artistic license" so to speak.
We ALL are compulsed to solve things in this way, it is the hardware we're all stuck with.
TLDR; you are more likely to "feel" something than not to. More likely to come to a belief than not. More likely to arbitrarily assign importance to events which you are more familiar with.
Actually I shouldn't say you, I should say humans.
We all feel like this, as for me--I just choose to be aware of it, and to resist it like the plague.
I wish I could go deeper into the brain talk here, but suffice it to say that the fuckin' thing sets us all up for failure when it comes to predicting complex problems (because it takes MAD shortcuts)--but at the same time it bids us do this 24 hours a day so long as we're awake.
It's nothing more than a very very very very very complex machine. It's a flawed and limited one when it comes to seeking altruism. Don't believe me?
Google "History of Western Man".
My big problem is that I know how the brain works more or less when it comes to crap like this (better than I want to). I actually know less about this kind of stuff (politics, econ, philo, logic, etc) BY FAR than I know about how the brain likes to organize stuff like this--and I am no fucking slouch in those areas (though still far from expert)
I'm as "uneducated" as you when it comes to this stuff--in fact--and that's what I meant (not that you need to school to talk with me, that'd be terrible).
Long story short as possible (since I just went off on a diatribe): the brain likes resolution--if there isn't any, it will manufacture it.
It has to do with how our memories are stored and how we perceive new information.
The brain is constantly filtering material (like a REALLY REALLY ADVANCED "importance separator"). Things that are unimportant, or the brain thinks are unimportant right then--literally fall straight through.
I mean that literally. They are gone not fuzzy. They were never committed to memory. This is part of why eyewitness testimony is shit. The brains ABHORS a vacuum. I wish there was a better word. There needs to be a stronger one.
If your brain could talk, it would talk all day about what a cunt an incomplete memory is. ALL DAY.
Whatever was filtered out must be "assumed" by your brain. Drumming up a memory is intense on-the-fly rendering of the experience itself--but because your brain doesnt download every pixel and sound as it has the experience, in order to reconstruct it it must take some "artistic license" so to speak.
We ALL are compulsed to solve things in this way, it is the hardware we're all stuck with.
TLDR; you are more likely to "feel" something than not to. More likely to come to a belief than not. More likely to arbitrarily assign importance to events which you are more familiar with.
Actually I shouldn't say you, I should say humans.
We all feel like this, as for me--I just choose to be aware of it, and to resist it like the plague.
I wish I could go deeper into the brain talk here, but suffice it to say that the fuckin' thing sets us all up for failure when it comes to predicting complex problems (because it takes MAD shortcuts)--but at the same time it bids us do this 24 hours a day so long as we're awake.
It's nothing more than a very very very very very complex machine. It's a flawed and limited one when it comes to seeking altruism. Don't believe me?
Google "History of Western Man".