Log In Register

Why is the Media Ignoring this Presidential Candidate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chickenman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Why is the Media Ignoring this Presidential Candidate?

chickenman 27 Replies 2,415 Views
Page 2 of 2 · Replies 21–28 of 28
I read a very interesting article about this very subject that offered some interesting opinions as to why RP is again being ignored. I'll have to see if I can find it again, repost.

Yes it is indeed a form of birth control. Better to kill it before it becomes anything more than a zygote.

Piss you off enough yet? If not, I'll work a little harder. I get to choose what happens to my body, not you, and not the parasite.

funny how all the people that condone abortion as birth control have already been born...?
 
The country is in shambles and the bankers are in control. What I`d like to know is what is it going to take to light a fire under the public`s ass and get them to wake up?

Excactly
The bankers control the media and they do not want Ron Paul
 
my friend its not abortion as birth control

its a woman's body and the fact that government or you

have no right to control women's bodies

it is their right to choose...not yours.

you must not have read her post then cause she clearly says yes it is indeed a form of birth control and thats why i responded.
 
funny how all the people that condone abortion as birth control have already been born...?

that's a logical argument... lol


how bout this, seeing that gov is fit to determine when or when not you can have an abortion... which is really, when or when not you can have a child... why not explicitly state that.

new rules... based on accepted old rules... you must now go through gov approval to even become pregnant in the first place. parents must now apply... and the gov will determine when it is okay or not to have kids? same as abortion, no?
 
I like Gary Johnson better..but he to, is unelectable.. so barry will get my vote again.. c'mon barry you can do better, i know you're on our side...
 
i to am for less government. i don't think they should be in our lives. i don't think people should have to apply to get pregnant. i just dont like the idea of tax payer dollars going to abortions. since its a woman's right to chose, it should be her right to pay for it too.

people make mistakes and make bad choices when they are young we all have. im not upset for the choices people have made in thier lives. the abortion as birth control thing is what bugged me.
 
It is just an opinion, and my opinion is its wrong. Seamaiden's is that its right. Two logical people with opinions. I'm not quite sure how abortion isn't relevant to an election debate..you just said its used to sway an emotional vote. Wouldn't a candidates stance on abortion be completely relevant? But I guess your the "super moderator" (such an authoritative title) so we'll talk about what YOU say to talk about. Oh nooooo here comes the baaan hammer! psh hahaha

Yeah thats it wise ass. LOL.

I didn't say you couldn't have an opinion or to stop talking about it. I said how about you talk about something with some ACTUAL relevance...as in something these presidential candidates can actually affect or change. because like i said, society is too far along to change any of that shit. yeah and guess what, swaying the emotional vote is politics, doesnt mean its good for anything other than being a politician looking for advantages that aren't there.

but of course assuming you can't have an opinion, say something without getting banned, etc shows your level of thought into things. keep on keeping on.
 
Page 2 of 2 · Replies 21–28 of 28
Back
Top Bottom