Is Cannabis Lab Testing A Scam???

  • Thread starter jumpincactus
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
I wasnt sure which forum this fit best in, so I opted for here. Great article.......


Is Cannabis Lab Testing A Scam

A few weeks ago I was waiting in the lounge of a cannabis dispensary and overheard a rather heated discussion about cannabis lab testing. One customer swore that it was a scam, and that dispensaries only advertised lab results as a marketing gimmick to legitimize outrageous prices. The other customer swore, “I’m not smoking no poison, I’d never buy weed that hasn’t been lab tested first.” While neither of the gentlemen were particularly well-informed about the subject, both arguments did have some merit, as well as some serious flaws.

The past decade has been a gold rush for the medical cannabis industry. Thousands have seen the opportunity to make a quick dollar and have jumped into an industry they hardly understand. Many would-be growers have no prior horticultural experience, and are ignorant of the risks associated with improperly grown cannabis. Others have no qualms about using dangerous chemicals and taking unethical shortcuts to produce their products. To make matters worse, many dispensary owners don’t understand the industry any better.

The market is flooded with cannabis that may appear to be high quality but in fact is coated in poisonous pesticides, fungicides, and plant growth regulator–or thriving with colonies of dangerous microbes–or both. While many cannabis users may not notice any ill effect in the short term, some medical cannabis users are seriously ill and highly susceptible to poisons, irritants, and microbes. These are the same patients who are not in a position to grow their own medicine and rely on dispensaries.

Every medicinal, pharmaceutical, food or drink producer is required to provide third-party testing to verify product safety. Unfortunately, there is no basic level of safety or quality required for medical cannabis or the medicinal products made from cannabis. While a few municipalities require dispensaries to have their products lab-tested, this is far from the norm.

As the industry has matured, many growers and dispensaries have begun to lab test their cannabis products for the safety of their patients, and/or to give them a competitive edge. As the demand has grown for these services, labs specializing in cannabis testing have sprung up like little ganja plants, to meet the needs of the market. Most medical marijuana states now have at least one laboratory that can perform basic tests. This has empowered dispensaries to test their products for both safety and and potency, which better enables patients to choose cannabis best suited for their symptoms.

Cannabis Testing Is A Good Thing, Right?
What’s with that scary word “scam” in the title? Back to my story of the two gentlemen arguing in the dispensary. As I listened to them argue I looked around and read the big sign above the counter that stated “All medicine has been lab tested.” What did that mean exactly? All of the samples behind the counter and on the menu had the THC levels advertised, so I had a pretty good idea they were at least doing basic potency testing.

I asked the three clerks behind the counter what other testing was performed. As expected, I got three completely different answers. One said that they tested for everything, the other said they tested for mold and THC. The last told me they didn’t test for mold anymore because it was too expensive and they only bought from reliable growers anyway. He also mentioned that it was all organic so we didn’t need to worry about pesticides. This was pretty much the response I expected. It’s not uncommon for people who work in an industry to know very little about it. It’s just a job, right?

The Low Cost of Testing Cannabis
What’s sad here is not how little they knew, but that for this particular dispensary, potency was a higher priority than safety. Lets look at the math and see how much money they saved by not testing for the safety of their product. For this example I am going to use retail customer prices available from our friends at SC labs. Potency testing runs $80 while testing for potency combined with pesticides, plant growth regulators, fungicides and microbes costs about $168. Most labs require only a one gram sample for testing and most dispensaries will only test one sample from any given batch of cannabis. This means if a dispensary buys one pound from a grower or vendor and sells it in ⅛ ounce (3.5 gram) increments for about $50 each, the dispensary would spend only 68 cents per sale for a complete test.

If this pisses you off, just wait. Dispensaries often buy more than one pound of the same cannabis at a time, sometimes 10 pounds or more. If the dispensary only payed to have one sample tested the cost per ⅛ ounce could be divided by 10, now costing the dispensary only about 7 cents per sale. On top of this, SC labs as well other labs, offer significantly reduced prices for accounts that do a high volume of business with the lab. You and I might not qualify for these savings, but dispensaries will. In many cases this could nearly cut the cost of testing in half again. Don’t ever let a dispensary tell you they can’t afford to do full lab testing on their medicine. It costs about the same to test the cannabis as the packaging your medicine came in.

Price List of SC Labs Testing Services
  • Potency – $80 (Cannabinoids)

  • Microbial – $50 (Mold, Mildew, E Coli etc)

  • Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and Fungicides- $50

  • All 3 of the above tests $180

  • Residual Solvents $100 (for extracts like BHO or Wax)
The Accuracy of Cannabis Potency Testing
Lets move on to potency testing, since that seems to be where most dispensaries are putting their money. How important is it to know the exact THC content of the cannabis you’re smoking? Some would argue it’s pretty darn important. Hey, you’re spending your hard earned money. You want to know you’re getting high quality medicine, right? Why would you buy an ⅛ that tests at 18% THC, when for the same price you could buy an ⅛ that looks and smells just as good and test at 20% THC?

I’m not going to tell you that cannabis potency testing is worthless but I will suggest it may not be as important or as accurate as you think. While the accuracy of test itself is probably spot on, no two buds off of the same plant are going to test exactly alike. I haven’t done an experiment myself, but based on a conversation with Ian at SC Labs, there is often as much as a 10% variation in the THC levels of multiple buds from the same plant. This means that even though the sample tested came back at 20%, the ⅛ you purchased could really be at 18% or it could be at 22% THC.

To complicated matters a bit more, the pound of buds that the sample came from probably contains buds from multiple plants. Hopefully they are from the same strain but that’s not guaranteed either. Harvest can be a busy and often confusing time. Growers rarely grow only one kind of plant. Mistakes happen. Expect a pound will have buds from multiple plants and possibly different phenotypes as well. Here is another monkey wrench to scramble your brain, the lab results can be skewed simply by how dry the bud is. Yes, I said it, the water content of the cannabis sample that is tested will affect the level of cannabinoids in the lab results.

Not All Lab Testing Is Equal
There are two primary methods for testing the cannabinoid potency of a cannabis sample. The first is Gas Chromotography which requires that the cannabinoids be vaporized so the gasses released can be analyzed. The downside of this method is that it does not differentiate between THCA and THC or any of the other cannabinoids in acid forms. This may not be important for some patients but makes it impossible to test for decarboxylation levels which are important for lab testing edibles.

The most accurate method for testing cannabis potency is with High Performance Liquid Chromatography. This method allows the testing facility to accurately read the levels of both THCA and THC as well as other cannabinoids in both of their forms. Considering the reasonable price of this equipment, any reputable facility testing cannabis potency should be using High Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Microbiological Contamination Testing
Unfortunately fungus and bacteria thrive in the same environments as cannabis. Anyone with much experience growing cannabis can tell you how common mold and mildew problems can be. Real-Time Polymerase Chain-Reaction (PCR) technology allows cannabis testing facilities to quickly and accurately determine the levels of potentially dangerous fungal contaminant such as Scopulariopsis, Rhizopus along with the more easily seen Botrytis and Powdery Mildew. Most cannabis growers and users wouldn’t guess that bacteria such as Listeria, E Coli are commonly discovered in the cannabis that dispensaries send for lab testing. Luckily these can all be detected through PCR testing. Pathogens like these may cause symptoms like food poisoning in healthy individuals but can be deadly for patients with compromised immune systems.

Pesticides, PGR’s and Fungicides
Most cannabis growers have very little experience with traditional horticulture and are usually ignorant of the proper and safe use of pesticides and fungicides. All too often poisons meant only for ornamental crops are used on cannabis. To make matters worse, dangerous and often banned substances like plant growth regulators are marketed directly to unknowing cannabis cultivators. Even pesticides and fungicides labeled as safe for food crops are meant to be applied to fruit and vegetables that can be washed before consumption. Cannabis is rarely washed before it is smoked.

We should also consider the potential chemical changes that might occur in a pesticide or fungicide when it is smoked and inhaled with the cannabis. I would wager that the majority of safety testing for pesticides is for crops that will be eaten and not smoked. Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry testing can detect dozens of these commonly used pesticide even when present in trace amounts.

Less Common But Equally Important
Residual Solvents – Cannabis Concentrates
The popularity of smoking or vaporizing hash oil, wax, budder, shatter and other forms of chemically concentrated cannabis is rapidly increasing. With this rise in popularity, amateurs are beginning to make their own extracts and develop new cheap methods for performing the extractions. All of the methods require a solvent. Some state of the art systems use high pressure CO2 but most use potentially dangerous substances like butane, ethanol, propane and a number of other petroleum or alcohol based solvents. Residual Solvent testing allows dispensaries to guarantee that their cannabis concentrates are free of chemical solvents or impurities and safe for their patients.

Terpene Analysis
Terpenes are organic compounds in the plant that create the odors that make each bud unique. Not only do they contribute to the enjoyment of smoking, but they have an impact on the medicinal and physiological effect. While still a relatively new service, some cannabis testing labs are beginning to test for terpene levels. As we begin to learn about the synergistic effect of terpenes and cannabinoids, pointless questions like “is it Indica or Sativa?” could soon be a thing of the past. This is a potential game changer for medicinal patients who struggle to find strains that work for their symptoms.

Edible Testing
Very rarely do I see lab testing done on edibles. While popular brands like Cheeba Chews test their own products and advertise potency on the label, many dispensaries make their own products and don’t really know the exact potency of their edibles. There is a little math required to convert the lab results on edibles to something intelligible to consumers, but it can and should be done. If for no other reason than patients need to know the potency of the edible they are consuming.

So, Is Cannabis Lab Testing A Scam?
If the only test a dispensary has done is the cannabinoid profiles, then yes, I would argue it is more of a marketing ploy than anything else. Cannabinoid ratios on their own, probably won’t help a customer make an educated guess as to what will work for them and it certainly won’t keep them safe from contaminated medicine.

I might be beating a dead horse, but I sincerely believe it is the responsibility of every dispensary to guarantee all the medicine they provide is safe for their patients. There are no established standards for the cannabis industry. This is the wild west. Cannabis dispensaries, growers, and cannabis testing facilities need to work together. Not only will patient benefit from reliable access to safe medicine, but the medicinal cannabis movement as a whole, might actually earn some of the legitimacy it has been struggling for.

http://www.marijuanagrowershq.com/is-cannabis-lab-testing-a-scam/
 
indicabush

indicabush

2,583
263
As always the cart is put before the horse. The biggest mistake made was not putting regulations and standards in place for the testing of cannabis for medical dispensaries; this called "Quality Assurance and Quality Control". Add the lack of employee knowledge and you have another GNC scenario on your hands. Everybody is now growing cannabis and trying to distribute it under the heading of medicinal usage. Flim-Flam, snake-oil sales persons at best is what the industry has created.
 
Seamaiden

Seamaiden

Living dead girl
23,596
638
Yep! Zero P&P (policy/procedure & protocol). But that said, I'm sure there have to be some decent labs out there. The unfortunate bit is sifting through them.

That said, I am of the same mind as the author with regard to testing for harmful substances, pathogens, molds, 'cides' and the like.
 
Blaze

Blaze

2,006
263
Good write up - testing is an incredibly powerful tool if used correctly. Using the same lab can help keep things consistent, but even still you will see variations in very sample, even from the same plant. So far I have been happy with SC Labs and their methods are consistent with EPA, ELAP, and FDA standards and transparent and detailed accounts for all testing procedures are provided.

It is important to point out however that although the safety tests in regards to molds and pesticides can be very important to ensure safety, they are not fool proof. The microbiological tests at this point cannot distinguish between harmful and benign bacteria and fungi so it is possible to have a false positive yet still be safe to smoke. It is also possible to have a false positive on pesticides are well - certain chemicals can be difficult to detect accurately, and how the data is interpreted by the labs also can have an effect. Overall though the safety tests are a huge step forward - and if the results from the Emerald Cup last year are any indication, there are definitely some shady growers out there who have no issue spraying their "organic" product with all sorts of toxic crap.

I am also glad to see people are starting to recognize how incredibly important terpenes are as well. Not only do they contribute to all the smell and flavor of cannabis, but they have a huge impact on the medical properties and the high of each strain. A potency test with out a terpene profile is utterly worthless information in my opinion, you are not seeing the whole picture without both.
 
LocalGrowGuy

LocalGrowGuy

2,497
263
I wasnt sure which forum this fit best in, so I opted for here. Great article.....

Is Cannabis Lab Testing A Scam

[POST]

http://www.marijuanagrowershq.com/is-cannabis-lab-testing-a-scam/
Do you have a dog in the fight?

Have you seen any side-by-side results for the same plant with differing methods?

Has there been a consensus in the industry as to what are considered best practices?

CannLabs does private testing.
"Each potency test will cost $40. We will need .5-1 gram of the flowers, and .5 gram of concentrate for the potency test.
You would need to come drop them off in person at our Denver office. The turn around time is about 3-5 days, but there is an option to pay extra to expedite results."

I am not nearly as concerned about registered grows as I would be about buying from a 'caregiver' or other grower who has no motivation to help, just to profit. This is where, imo, most issues lie, because at the end of the day it isn't very likely that an MMC or OPC or MIP or DFW or DMV would be using plant regulators and hormones and other bad stuff. The cash croppers are much less likely to be worried about testing or results, their 'job' is finished at the point of sale.

This is an interesting topic.
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
Do you have a dog in the fight?

Have you seen any side-by-side results for the same plant with differing methods?

Has there been a consensus in the industry as to what are considered best practices?

CannLabs does private testing.
"Each potency test will cost $40. We will need .5-1 gram of the flowers, and .5 gram of concentrate for the potency test.
You would need to come drop them off in person at our Denver office. The turn around time is about 3-5 days, but there is an option to pay extra to expedite results."

I am not nearly as concerned about registered grows as I would be about buying from a 'caregiver' or other grower who has no motivation to help, just to profit. This is where, imo, most issues lie, because at the end of the day it isn't very likely that an MMC or OPC or MIP or DFW or DMV would be using plant regulators and hormones and other bad stuff. The cash croppers are much less likely to be worried about testing or results, their 'job' is finished at the point of sale.

This is an interesting topic.

I heard what you said and I wanted to take a sec to clarify.

Yes I do have a dog in the fight.

Not sure what you meant with, have I seen any side by sides with differing methods. How many methods are there and when do you think all labs will be all on the same page to a set standard and equipment along with the same standardized protocol for testing and what vectors are tested???

Now here's the rub. I hope I didn't offend you with this post. I truly thought it was a subject that needs more attention and transparency concerning testing and lab methods and protocol. Hell dude there are states out there and I'm in 1 of them that dont even require any testing at all. Which opens the door for the more unscrupulous types in the commercial dispo sector to take advantage of this. It is after all a cost saving measure to NOT test. You reference to cash croppers ARE the commercial dispos that arent and a handfull of of independent registered or black market growers that play in the same arena, who really dont give a rats A## about what quality of meds they are turnin and burnin (no pun).

I was sort of put off by the way you came across because I have worked for a legit dispo and saw with my own eyes the use of PGR's and pesticides and herbicides that are not kool to use. Also the only people I run with are small time boutique growers that take great pride in their craft and aren't the type to pass off poison for a buck.
I almost felt as if you were inferring that commercial legal dispos were more legit and caring than the underground grower. Most of the folks I associate with are not like that and turn out way better and safer meds than I have seen in any dispo. I hope that Denver will set the stage for the rest of the Nation and lets all just get our shit together so no patient has to worry about whats in their medicine.

Hopefully, I just misinterpreted the point you were trying to make and I took it all out of context. If so, I stand down and apologize in advance. :smoking:
 
LocalGrowGuy

LocalGrowGuy

2,497
263
I heard what you said and I wanted to take a sec to clarify.

Yes I do have a dog in the fight.

Not sure what you meant with, have I seen any side by sides with differing methods. How many methods are there and when do you think all labs will be all on the same page to a set standard and equipment along with the same standardized protocol for testing and what vectors are tested???

Now here's the rub. I hope I didn't offend you with this post. I truly thought it was a subject that needs more attention and transparency concerning testing and lab methods and protocol. Hell dude there are states out there and I'm in 1 of them that dont even require any testing at all. Which opens the door for the more unscrupulous types in the commercial dispo sector to take advantage of this. It is after all a cost saving measure to NOT test. You reference to cash croppers ARE the commercial dispos that arent and a handfull of of independent registered or black market growers that play in the same arena, who really dont give a rats A## about what quality of meds they are turnin and burnin (no pun).

I was sort of put off by the way you came across because I have worked for a legit dispo and saw with my own eyes the use of PGR's and pesticides and herbicides that are not kool to use. Also the only people I run with are small time boutique growers that take great pride in their craft and aren't the type to pass off poison for a buck.
I almost felt as if you were inferring that commercial legal dispos were more legit and caring than the underground grower. Most of the folks I associate with are not like that and turn out way better and safer meds than I have seen in any dispo. I hope that Denver will set the stage for the rest of the Nation and lets all just get our shit together so no patient has to worry about whats in their medicine.

Hopefully, I just misinterpreted the point you were trying to make and I took it all out of context. If so, I stand down and apologize in advance. :smoking:
No offense taken here, ever. No worries. I am running out the door but I am talking about different methods of testing potency or other parts of the plant. For example, send the same flower samples to different testing companies and see what comes back and if they are close or not. The acronyms escape me at the moment but I'll clarify when I have a second.

I just see (edit- 'have seen' past tense) PGR's at the caregiver level, unregulated wild west style, not anything like goes on here. I know of a shop that advises the use of paclobutrazol to control stretch in flower for edible crops. I have more experience with the business side of this industry as I am in the employee benefits sector. I am not badged so I don't see many MMC grows, and the private grows I do see are legit. My negative experiences are not recent and are more anecdotal than a testament to the current industry as a whole. I hope this clarifies a bit. I am interested by the discussion and I don't care who people are or where they are at. People are people and I try not to judge, but that's difficult in this industry to 'not' take a position on a subject.

All I know is what MADD tells me. No, not really. :)

There are shitty people at every level in this industry, and I apologize if my post came off as anti-grower or anti-MMC or anti-caregiver or whatever. I am happy to see that this is most definitely the exception now and not the rule, and that's a good thing in my eyes.
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
Thank you man. I appreciate your clarifying. It helped a lot. Been a long bad Monday....... No worries. Thanks for taking the time!!! :D
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
I am also glad to see people are starting to recognize how incredibly important terpenes are as well. Not only do they contribute to all the smell and flavor of cannabis, but they have a huge impact on the medical properties and the high of each strain. A potency test with out a terpene profile is utterly worthless information in my opinion, you are not seeing the whole picture without both
Yes indeed. Called the "Entourage Effect" All about the whole plant.......
 
jumpincactus

jumpincactus

Premium Member
Supporter
11,609
438
It's been 10 months since this thread started. Is anyone seeing any positive changes in this topics subject matter? Or is is more of the same ole same ole, with little to no changes?
 
MirrorZen

MirrorZen

1,362
263
Great read!
Oregon has laws coming into full effect within a few days, but only testing facilities that have been approved as using the correct standard (basically Oregon pharmaceutical grade) and thwere is only a handful right now, but they will have no choice but all revert to one standard approved by OLCC. It will be really badass up here in about a year. Testing standards have to be the same in order to have a true comparison. My sister owns a dispo and gets stuff tested at "30%" thc all the time and it ends up being garbage. Sister is mad about the new laws, but for a grower looking for consistency, it couldn't get much better.
 
SpiderK

SpiderK

2,339
263
yup ...............

gg4 w/ 26%. lol', then cali mist should be reading 45 or so ..... if thc% = level reached, you smoke that shit and you can hardly drive a car
 
GrowGod

GrowGod

BANNED!
Supporter
8,429
313
Yes, but can be useful if you get everything tested at the same facility. Numbers maybe off but will give you an estimate
 
lino

lino

2,637
263
Great read!
Oregon has laws coming into full effect within a few days, but only testing facilities that have been approved as using the correct standard (basically Oregon pharmaceutical grade) and thwere is only a handful right now, but they will have no choice but all revert to one standard approved by OLCC. It will be really badass up here in about a year. Testing standards have to be the same in order to have a true comparison. My sister owns a dispo and gets stuff tested at "30%" thc all the time and it ends up being garbage. Sister is mad about the new laws, but for a grower looking for consistency, it couldn't get much better.
I did some consulting last summer in Oregon , the dirtiest most ugly dispense bud ive ever seen. I must not have found the good bud you guys produce. From portland to Bend, all i saw was actual poisen .. no lab needed.. we put it in a microwave and watch the fireworks show.. the grower in Alfalfa was pumpimg out a bunch of poisen all over the state.
 
SpiderK

SpiderK

2,339
263
the university of illinois, one of the top ag schools in the world talks about soil test is very subjective, not much value.

@lino

water content alters testing correct ??? and what is the best level needed for the best results and how can they test everything in these optimal conditions. ( moisture content ). or what if its dried then moist again ?

have they determined when bud starts breaking down losing its punch.
 
GT21

GT21

I like soup
Supporter
10,114
438
As always the cart is put before the horse. The biggest mistake made was not putting regulations and standards in place for the testing of cannabis for medical dispensaries; this called "Quality Assurance and Quality Control". Add the lack of employee knowledge and you have another GNC scenario on your hands. Everybody is now growing cannabis and trying to distribute it under the heading of medicinal usage. Flim-Flam, snake-oil sales persons at best is what the industry has created.
Amen to the.... were ruining an industry before it even becomes legal...just what our gov wants
 
MirrorZen

MirrorZen

1,362
263
I did some consulting last summer in Oregon , the dirtiest most ugly dispense bud ive ever seen. I must not have found the good bud you guys produce. From portland to Bend, all i saw was actual poisen .. no lab needed.. we put it in a microwave and watch the fireworks show.. the grower in Alfalfa was pumpimg out a bunch of poisen all over the state.
Damn must you must have hit all the budget garbage. Yeah no idea what your talking about. Portland has some better Shit than the Bay would produce.
Archive Portland, Mic drop. Look them up on ig and then tell me we only shovel garbage.
Best buds are from PNW in my humble opinion.
 
MirrorZen

MirrorZen

1,362
263
Also it could be hit or miss where you go, some dispos are trying to provide quality, while others are just trying to further their dollar. I am very selective and we have had quite an influx of idiots from out of state opening dispensaries, and providing pure garbage for a price. This is what the legal side looks like. A lot of assholes from out of state.

Ps sorry for the non topics
 
lino

lino

2,637
263
the university of illinois, one of the top ag schools in the world talks about soil test is very subjective, not much value.

@lino
I;m speaking of field test, skools will show ya this little traingle thingy with soil compaction/sand type chart
water content alters testing correct ??? and what is the best level needed for the best results and how can they test everything in these optimal conditions. ( moisture content ). or what if its dried then moist again ?

have they determined when bud starts breaking down losing its punch.
Moisture content,,, IMO not enough to worry about , but I'd have the water tested if it were in question, (well, alkiline etc)..

I still pull plug and have soil tested, field, for like a realaste sale and stuff, but the best soil test I was ever taught was the ol Farmer Spit soil test (dont chew gum), ol guy trades 40 acre lease for my work. I was 12 yo. I traded for a herd of sheep also. Ol Farmers ask me: how do you know if that land will produce enough for your heard. I says; I'll have the soil tested and I gonna plant alfalfa, have some extra to sell> he walk me around, with small tbl spoon of soil in his hand from different parts of the property he spit on the soil in his hand and rubs it around... The ol guys show me smeared soil we paint the soil, he says well put gypsum down here , at one end of the field his had full dirt and our spit broke down to sand- he say ye'll get 3 front end loader scopes down here, he kicks the dirt see it soft and to loose, we'll get the manure deep out of the cattle lot, heavy clay/manure down here, He finishes by saying; thats what the colo soil test co gonna tell ya. He throws in some ammonia for the spring sprouts.
comment::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
determined when bud starts breaking down losing its punch.
Reply:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I have never been around a pro-cannabis testing facility so I should shut my mouth, but you know me:: Ponder this; what about the Mex grower breeders, in colo you Rarely see a brick of Mex but the good Mex , well you and I know that shit would hold for years in some cases (in a brick) and still have one hell of kick,,, try bricking some OG, these new grn strains, what Happens to that bud, dust, so thats hard to answer.

SO IS CANNABIS LAB TESTING A SCAM ??? i hate chemistry , i'm not your expert but I'll give a testing center this,. a good chemist, ask him , is this exact chemical in this compound. He'll usually find it if the levels are high enough.
My shit 38% tested from lab XYZ, IDK....
 
lino

lino

2,637
263
Damn must you must have hit all the budget garbage. Yeah no idea what your talking about. Portland has some better Shit than the Bay would produce.
Archive Portland, Mic drop. Look them up on ig and then tell me we only shovel garbage.
Best buds are from PNW in my humble opinion.
Sorry, I was not clear. Anyone who been around knows what kinda bud comes from you guys... I was pist at the quality and poisons at that time , I stopped at many dispense , not to many in Portland- we even went into the Indian dispenses all those shop from Port to Bend. Then I find the guy that I'm consulting for, no detail other than I think it was you that said; Out of Staters pumping crap around your state dispense, Yup, guy in alfalfa, Huge grn houses, on site lab testing, I told the guy he shouldnt do that. .disaster. cuz I was not able to help him, I never ran into this kinda attitude from a person with very ill plants, all the grn house were sick and I was asked how much gram/watt I have his sick plant to produce, Oregon had a weird law back then rite when rec opened up bout grn houses and lites, the guy wanted me to break the law there also, disaster- and AT THIS TIME , I speculate that he was a major producer of crap for many dispenses at that time,,,,
Now ON TOPIC
If I remember, Oregon didnt want on site Labs,.. Makes sense to me, testing your own product. So I'd hope Oregon got the out stater inline.
Microwave _ I was referring to testing cannabis for poisons. I'm not going to be a pyro tech here but microwave bud will tell many types of chemicals,,, I dont need to identify the chemical for you by color during the fireworks show that happens when cannabis that is full metals and poisons are nuked. At Home Lab Testing - farmers fyi. NUKED CANNABIS FIREWORKS SHOWS IN a MICROWAVE ARE BAD bud! But it 30% THC, lol
 
Top Bottom