Truth does not fear investigation.
Sigh, then it doesn't need an implicative preface of "who thought of it."
Nor does it need fake information attributed to famous people, I think you would agree with me there? Try to find some of those articles. They don't exist. The NY Times one is pretty simple to check. (If I'm wrong, I eat it) But for someone who is touting a standard of investigation, & looking "deeper", you see the irony.
How bout some real recent quotes (ie: not "50 years old") from the global ruling class?
The first two things (quotes/articles) I looked into, don't' even exist. This whole debate started with me simply saying you have built an argument on a faulty premise. You then "info bomb" me. The first two things I look at, are blatant falsifications. Do you see why I "pass" now? Unless I'm wrong, you just proved my point.
So tell me again how Israel is not ruled by a supremacist cult focused on destroying the culture of the west?
I never said it in the fist place. I simply said your logic is based on a faulty premise. Or it was my intent anyway to encapsulate that thought. I don't believe I said anything incendiary, or used such language. I don't believe I ever even mentioned "the Jews."
Its amazing how people who's only brush with communism is wistfully in college and through cultural marxism see it through rose colored glasses, while Fidel commie-bro from Cuba who's actually lived with it understands exactly what I'm saying...
Uh huh. I'm going to assume you aren't talking about me, not because I'm proud or offended, because it just comes off as propagandist again.
The "amazing" thing I see here, is you, posting fake articles. I have a very high opinion of you & I
think, you might even agree this isn't personal. I have no quarrel with you. But I wouldn't let bull@#$ slide, no matter what the topic. I suspect you wouldn't either.
But I wont occupy this thread any further with this topic... anything else, I'll be glad to debate in private message...
As will I. I just returned from a long weekend (the reason for the delay)
But as I said, if either of us was unknowingly posting false info, I think the other would want to know. I don't think there is anything more to debate.
The only reason I even posted this here in public, is because you put it out there.
No ill-will meant. I'm sorry if I was offensive at any point. I will leave it alone now, even if I have to eat $!@# on that NY Times article. But the fact that information has to be "made" to look real for people to believe it should tell you something. I'm not implying any malice on your part.
Peace & positive vibes to all.