I know i have made many mistakes in life. mistake after mistake after mistake. I'm not but hurt by anyone saying i'm wrong. But throwing out vague statements doesn't really cut it either squiggly. I have dissected cadavers, have you? What you forget squiggly is that you have not even found who YOU are and yet you make wild claims about me lol. You think you're an expert but an expert needs wisdom which you have none. You are always asking for proof but do not even attempt to look at other perspectives..It's ok..classic narcissist.
Here you want some logic here it goes. The pentagon attack could not have logically been a plane. With no wing damage to the building it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that in FACT it was not a jumbo jet flying around 20' over ground with a 120'+ wingspan going 500+ MPH that hit the building. Try and prove me wrong on this. Please if you can i will have no problem saying that I'm WRONG. I have no problem with that. I have asked you this several times and your scientific answer was "my friend told me it was a plane" lol. Again, when you can't "logically" explain something you say someone told you and "he wouldn't lie to me" lol.
And as far as cancer goes I've gone through day and night of 2 of my family members having Cancer and seeing what they went through everyday and night. What have you experienced about cancer?? You have been cradled by your family all your life. You have lived a priviledged life because of them yet you think you are better than others lol. I wonder how you would act if you're family members were killed and you sent to live in china as a kid and deal with their culture.
Wisdom is only gained through experiencing the positive and negative of something and you squiggly have experienced very little. Yet you keep writing eloquently but you forget you have no experience. you only talk about what you have been told. When you're mind can think for itself you will have evolved some.
Funny you live in a glass house yet want to throw stones at me...lol...prove me wrong about the pentagon attack lol....
I didn't say I'm an expert.
In fact I'll categorically state here that I'm not an expert at anything but getting myself really incredibly stoned.
What I said is dude who mentioned physics doesn't have physics expertise, and that you aren't demonstrating any expertise when you make the claims that you have. You're literally just diarrhea-ing unprovable statements out. Dissecting a cadaver isn't going to run the clock back and un-say all of the bullshit you said, lol.
You're right, I will always be figuring out who I am--we all are. We create who we are with every moment. There is no CPU in our brains that defines us--we are nothing more than a collection of our memories and experiences. I'm becoming me right now by having this discussion. It's true--it's also moot as it relates to this.
I'm not making assumptions about you--I'm flat out factually stating that you've been saying things which you can't prove, and don't have much if any expertise to speak on.
Here's the thing bro, about your emboldened statement:
It's you guessing. You have no expertise to judge what type of damage would/would not be possible from a jumbo jet to the pentagon. You don't cite any flight path information, any material information, any velocity information.
Hell, you don't cite any information at all. You just think you can know what such a complex system will do by virtue of looking at it.
May I humbly suggest that if this is the case, that you are in the wrong line of work. You should be a famous theoretical physicist working at CERN.
And as far as cancer goes I've gone through day and night of 2 of my family members having Cancer and seeing what they went through everyday and night. What have you experienced about cancer?? You have been cradled by your family all your life. You have lived a priviledged life because of them yet you think you are better than others lol. I wonder how you would act if you're family members were killed and you sent to live in china as a kid and deal with their culture.
And now we're full circle. You first claim I've been making assumptions about you, and that it's unfair--and then you hypocritically start assuming things about me. I'll debunk some of those for you now.
1. I've lost 3 extended members of my family to cancer (the only ones I was close to--two grandparents and a cousin who was my age). A very close friend of mine has also lived with my mother for about 10 years as a result of his mother dying from cancer.
2. I have done research on a cancer drug our two in my time, but am currently working with Nelfinavir (an HIV protease inhibitor) and have just wrapped up a bout of research with denopamine and sotalol.
3. I have not lived a privileged life in the context of being an American except to say that I have a well educated mother, who also saw to it that I was well educated--but she is a public school teacher, and was a single mother. I grew up in a shit neighborhood in Cook County, Illinois. Everything I have
I bought, and it has nearly always been that way. I've been paying bills since I was somewhere around 14 and have been constantly employed since the same time. I took community college half time for 4 years and worked to pay for it, because I did not qualify for government aid. I was accepted to a university but could not afford it at the time. I am only able to afford it now based on merit scholarships which I have also
earned. I pay for my education currently, and always have. Of all the assumptions you made, this is the most heinous--I have not come to where I am today by virtue of anyone's work but my own and my mother's (when she was able). I have earned every small bit of luxury that I have in my life. It's a joke to say my family has cradled me. My mother was there for me when she could be--but the rest of my immediate family has done nothing but shit on, beat, and demean me throughout my entire existence. My extended family is a different story but I've seen them maybe 10 times in my life.
4. You claim I have no experience, but yet again you find yourself making claims which you cannot prove--and assuming things which are completely foreign and unknown to you. I can't say that I'm surprised--but that won't make you any less wrong.
[Edit] 5. You know what I wasn't going to mention this, but I figured why the fuck not. When I was 14 I was actually
diagnosed with a mild form of skin cancer. I was never in imminent danger of dying, but I did undergo chemo (fucking terrible) and I have had multiple surgeries over the last 12 years relating to this (as moles get weird I must have them removed, and I've got plenty of them). As a result of these surgeries my body is totally and completely littered with scars. Having this experience is what caused me to become interested in doing pharmaceutical research--to do exactly what you think it is so easy for science to do (cure cancer). So, fuck you very much.
As for the plane. Let's say the thing bounced off the ground first and shit the wings onto the ground by breaking them off. Leaving them behind prior to hitting the building.
Holy shit that was really difficult to conjecture--next please.
Truth is that statement is just as bullshit as yours. No extrapolation was formed, we don't have the debris to study, etc.
These are ALL THINGS WHICH YOU FUCKING NEED TO MAKE A PHYSICS ARGUMENT ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT A PLANE HIT SOMETHING. PERIOD.
I mean that in the same sense as the following sentence:
Hitler had a mustache. Period.
So no dude, you haven't made an argument. You've guessed something.
Congratulations on your powers of guess-age. They are quite astute. Get back to me if you find some proof for any of what you've said. I recognize that because you don't have access to the data, you will never be able to do this. Consequently neither will I and so therefore I can't disprove any theory or version of events (without that data).
That in itself leaves the debate open--but it's not going to get ANYWHERE NEAR proving your point. All you've got, and all you will ever have until you gain some physics expertise and the data set--is what you're either making up for yourself or regurgitating from someone else who made it up.
It's funny, again you did the same thing as the previous person I mentioned. You start off by saying that you'll make a scientific argument--and then the very next thing you do is prove that you haven't a fucking clue how to do that.
You might be older and "more experienced" than me, but I personally am taking that to mean that I'm doing a pretty fucking job so far. If I've already surpassed an older more experienced person's ability to argue and communicate, I must have been making at least some of the right decisions along the way.
Read some non-fiction homie, it'll do wonders for you.