El Cerebro
- Posts
- 1,197
- Reactions
- 815
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Points
- 113
@dizzlekush, what is your medium, container size, and irrigation frequency?
121,288 growers, practical cultivation threads, real grow diaries, and community advice.
Create account → Already a member? Log inFollow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
great questions.@dizzlekush, what is your medium, container size, and irrigation frequency?
I lower my CalciNit applications in late flower since it will give some strains what i call "The curse of eternally white stigmas", and the plant will never look fully mature. Im fairly positive this is due to the excess Ca instead of N though, since i've found lots of scientific lit on Ca delaying maturation/senescence and most scientific lit i find on N talks about N DEFICIENCY causing a delay in maturation, have found nothing on excess causing it.
This leads me to believe the common belief amongst cannabis cultivators that N is bad for flowering comes from over application of Calcium Nitrate delaying maturation, and the N being blamed instead of the Ca.This is just like how NH4 is often blamed for causing stretch when its an overapplication of mono or di ammonium phosphate and the extra P that causes stretch.
The N to Ca ratio is relatively unimportant aside from its effect on lodging and insect & mold susceptibility. A lack of either will increase susceptibility, but the higher the N and the lower the Ca the more susceptible the plant becomes. Excess N softens tissues, while Ca toughens it. The softer the tissue, the more susceptible the crop is to lodging, insects and molds. Other than that, Cannabis will grow very happily on a wide range of N:Ca ratio as long as adequate amounts of each are provided.
The Ca:Mg ratio is much more important, as each antagonizes the uptake of the other, 3:1 - 2:1 Ca:Mg being the optimal range.
150ppm Ca? Yosemite Sam was going that high in Ca trying to get the Albrecht ratio's in his medium (old-school discredited science), but last i heard from him it was causing some serious delays in his crops maturation, although the ladies looked very healthy. you noticing anything?
3-1-2 is great for veg, 2-1-2 isn't optimal for bloom but plants will do just fine on it. 2-1-2 is considered the 'go-to' ratio for most horticultural applications
sorry not sure, no real experience there. the peat thing might throw off comparisons for a few of us (every 4-6 days!:eek:o_O hell 4-6 hours even sounds like a stretch to me, haha)So is it the same for something like 50/50 coco/perlite??
sorry not sure, no real experience there. the peat thing might throw off comparisons for a few of us (every 4-6 days!:eek:o_O hell 4-6 hours even sounds like a stretch to me, haha)
sorry not sure, no real experience there. the peat thing might throw off comparisons for a few of us (every 4-6 days!:eek:o_O hell 4-6 hours even sounds like a stretch to me, haha)
Thank you. Sounds like you know a thing or two that we can all benefit from . I have suffered from the never ending pistil theory.. but also noticed denser buds. I don't mind letting them go a little longer though, especially if they are packing on weight while they are doing it.
sorry not sure, no real experience there. the peat thing might throw off comparisons for a few of us (every 4-6 days!:eek:o_O hell 4-6 hours even sounds like a stretch to me, haha)
Yeah 5 days and all my plants would be dead.
sorry not sure, no real experience there. the peat thing might throw off comparisons for a few of us (every 4-6 days!:eek:o_O hell 4-6 hours even sounds like a stretch to me, haha)
Yea this is one of the reasons i gave up on coco. so much work. I like being able to leave for 5 days and abandon the garden and have it thriving when i get back. That and this study gave me the motivation to do a side by side comparison of peat vs coco and the peat plants did much better with much less work.Yeah 5 days and all my plants would be dead.
Yea this is one of the reasons i gave up on coco. so much work. I like being able to leave for 5 days and abandon the garden and have it thriving when i get back. That and this study gave me the motivation to do a side by side comparison of peat vs coco and the peat plants did much better with much less work.
TO ALL COCO USERS! please read this study, its really, REALLY worth the download. i promise that there's no virus attached, its from a university website. This could potentially change the way you grow forever.
www.usu.edu/cpl/PDF/CoconutCoirPaper.pdf
You can get most of the gist of the study by simply looking at the pictures, but this is one part worthy of note:
"Ma and Nichols (2004) recently reported that the problems with coir extend beyond its high salinity. Their data indicate that high concentrations of phenolic compounds in fresh coir are at least partly responsible for the growth reductions observed in other studies."
Another thing worth note is that cheap ass "Grow Coir" did much better than whats often considered the industry leader "Canna Coco" or any other brand.
On the other side of the timing coin is the theory about shortening flowering times with more intense conditions of high light pressure, higher temps, higher RH (VPD correct) and CO2 augmentation.
I know you are correct that higher temperatures and higher CO2 levels will promote an earlier maturation since both increase ethylene biosynthesis in plants, which promotes maturation. I have no idea about light conditions (as PPFD, DLI or even SPD) or VPD and their effect on maturation. I would imagine VPD has next to no effect, but light conditions might.
CorrectWhen ya'll say peat I assume its sphagnum peat moss not humus, correct?
First off you should never let soil dry out. The real advantage behind soil is the environment it provides for microbes. Every time you allow soil to dry you lose a significant amount of your microbial density, lessening the benefits from soil grows.So how would you treat a 50/50 peat/perlite media? Do you allow the media to dry like soil in between waterings and do you have to use plain water in between feedings?
Yea this is one of the reasons i gave up on coco. so much work. I like being able to leave for 5 days and abandon the garden and have it thriving when i get back. That and this study gave me the motivation to do a side by side comparison of peat vs coco and the peat plants did much better with much less work.
TO ALL COCO USERS! please read this study, its really, REALLY worth the download. i promise that there's no virus attached, its from a university website. This could potentially change the way you grow forever.
www.usu.edu/cpl/PDF/CoconutCoirPaper.pdf
You can get most of the gist of the study by simply looking at the pictures, but this is one part worthy of note:
"Ma and Nichols (2004) recently reported that the problems with coir extend beyond its high salinity. Their data indicate that high concentrations of phenolic compounds in fresh coir are at least partly responsible for the growth reductions observed in other studies."
Another thing worth note is that cheap ass "Grow Coir" did much better than whats often considered the industry leader "Canna Coco" or any other brand.
Correct
First off you should never let soil dry out. The real advantage behind soil is the environment it provides for microbes. Every time you allow soil to dry you lose a significant amount of your microbial density, lessening the benefits from soil grows.
the extra root space and the plants will want it.
Well I am getting ready to start up... if anyone wants to help, I am willing to go chowmix using the peat moss instead of the coco.
LMK as I am getting ready to crack seeds around the first. Glad I waited. I have 15 gallon fabric pots that I will be using and going with SCROG.