greenjoe
- 1,589
- 163
Why are you being so combative WG? Provide some real evidence or stop attempting to spread unfounded fear based rumors.
It's funny. You act like I'm the stupid one eating paint chips yet you don't know the difference between to and too or your and you're. I love it.i realize you spent your youth licking the windows at nanna's house so i'll type a little slower this time
I live here you idiot, been here half a century, know at least 200 folks that use cannabis and know a dozen or better that have been raided so i think i'm a better judge of what go's on around here then your dumbass in colorado trying to dig shit up on google
you call me a troll, say i'm worried about your whopping 6 x 600 hps? coming to town to infringe on my beaster gro-op? wtf? dude
i now understand why your leaving colorado, it's because you can't make it there and i'll tell you what dumbass, you'll be living on the street here in 6 months because your way to smart to listen to anybody
it's not the location dumbass, it's you
enjoy google
:)
fwiw
qfmftit's funny. You act like i'm the stupid one eating paint chips yet you don't know the difference between to and too or your and you're. I love it.
Obviously you have no proof to substantiate your paranoid, fear based claims. So, i'll end this conversation once and for all by publicly telling you to go fuck yourself. See you soon sweetheart,
bill
So, I'll end this conversation once and for all by publicly telling you to go fuck yourself. See you soon sweetheart,
Bill
Might as well gift wrap that threat in a children's birthday card. It would come off just as scary.black forester with colorado plates?
you just may get to see me :)
Finally some real news! Thank you! I'll look this info over now...http://www.aclu-wa.org/news/sentencing-medical-marijuana-patient-shows-need-reform-state-law
http://www.aclu-wa.org/news/aclu-supports-medical-marijuana-patient-s-right-fair-trial-0
http://www.cannabisculture.com/v2/c...ourt-Ruling-Scares-Medical-Marijuana-Patients
A. Knapstad Motion to Dismiss on Insufficient Evidence
Many medical marijuana cases seem as though they should be easily resolved to anyone with an understanding of the law. Unfortunately, it is not rare for a patient who has complied with the statute to be arrested and prosecuted. Most prosecutors are savvy enough to dispute some factual element of the affirmative defense. However, if you’re lucky enough to run across a prosecutor who is not so savvy, your client has the option of bringing a Knapstad motion to dismiss, or agreeing to a stipulated trial. The Knapstad motion is generally the better option, as it protects your case better on appeal (prosecutors will be unlikely to agree to stipulated facts that include favorable-to-the-defendant expert testimony, for example), and still gives you the option of going to a jury, which generally tends to be more sympathetic than a judge.
In State v. Knapstad, the Washington Supreme Court held that “a trial court may dismiss charges after the State's opening statement to a jury when it is clear beyond doubt that the statement affirmatively includes factual matter which constitutes a complete defense to the charge or expressly excludes factual matter essential to a conviction.” State v. Knasptad, 107 Wn.2d 346, 351-352 (1986) (citing State v. Gallagher, 15 Wn. App. 267. 270 (1976). Further…”a trial court may dismiss if the State's pleadings including any bill of particulars, are insufficient to raise a jury issue on all elements of the charge.” id. at 352.
http://www.invalid.com/legalization-decriminalization/140612-us-wa-reining-medical-marijuana.html
I rarely say much here but I will let you know a few things. First mmj in WA state is a defense not a right or legal in any way.
http://www.cannabisnews.org/united-...ay-says-no-to-medical-marijuana-dispensaries/
http://shoreline.patch.com/articles/medical-marijuana-organizations-find-themselves-in-legal-limbo
Here are a few little links. I personally know some of the people involved in these news
articles and I will tell you this for a fact. No one has been able to get any of the money
or medicine back. So they are out that amount and some of have been further harrassed at their homes. Also, patients who have been "customers" have been investigated and/or watched. I personally don't care if anyone comes here or not. Just saying it's not as 420 friendly as you may think. Again, it is legally a defense not a license. So you can be arrested and you can use it as a defense for what you were doing as long as you don't go over your plant or medicine limit. Then you can't even use the defense.
Frequently asked questions about
Medical Marijuana in Washington State
Is medical marijuana legal in Washington? I've heard conflicting answers to this question.
Marijuana possession is illegal in Washington. The medical marijuana law, Chapter 69.51A RCW, provides an affirmative defense for qualified patients and designated caregivers. People who qualify have a valid reason to possess a 60-day supply of marijuana. They may use that reason to defend against a legal action taken under Washington law. However, medical marijuana is not legal under federal law. There is no affirmative defense for people who are arrested or charged under federal law.
http://www.doh.wa.gov/hsqa/medical-marijuana/
Link for above copy and paste.
Just sayin'
Tried telling me what? That growing, using and/or selling Cannabis is illegal in the USA? Thank's, I'll file that under no shit, again.lmao
i tried telling him this already but he keeps twisting it back to what he wants it to be instead of what it is
btw bill. bad move on the pm,the wife read it because i was laughing at it and she got a bit pissed then called the kids in
i'll pm ya later when i have time
btw,welcome to washington :)
fwiw
Tried telling me what? That growing, using and/or selling Cannabis is illegal in the USA? Thank's, I'll file that under no shit, again.
The medical use of cannabis in
25 accordance with the terms and conditions of this chapter does not
26 constitute a crime and a qualifying patient or designated provider in
27 compliance with the terms and conditions of this chapter may not be
28 arrested, prosecuted, or subject to other criminal sanctions or civil
29 consequences, for possession, manufacture, or delivery of, or for
30 possession with intent to manufacture or deliver, cannabis under state
31 law, or have real or personal property seized or forfeited for
32 possession, manufacture, or delivery of, or for possession with intent
33 to manufacture or deliver, cannabis under state law, and investigating
34 peace officers and law enforcement agencies maynot be held civilly
35 liable for failure to seize cannabis in this circumstance, if:36 (1)(a) The qualifying patient or designated provider possesses no
37 more than fifteen cannabis plants and:
38 (i) No more than twenty-four ounces of useable cannabis;
E2SSB 5073.SL p. 12
1 (ii) No more cannabis product than what could reasonably be
2 produced with no more than twenty-four ounces of useable cannabis; or
3 (iii) A combination of useable cannabis and cannabis product that
4 does not exceed a combined total representing possession and processing
5 of no more than twenty-four ounces of useable cannabis.
6 (b) If a person is both a qualifying patient and a designated
7 provider for another qualifying patient, the person may possess no more
8 than twice the amounts described in (a) of this subsection, whether the
9 plants, useable cannabis, and cannabis product are possessed
10 individually or in combination between the qualifying patient and his
11 or her designated provider;
Excerpt from the new bill, the part that wasn't stricken and was signed by the Governor and is effective this Friday, the 22nd.
The whole thing is here:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?