dunit's first diary gave .9 grams pr. watt, and two main reasons for using LED over HPS is.
A: Power consumption
B: Heat exhaustion.
On the first note 0.9 grams pr. Watt is not that impressive for a grow using CO2 and a grow tent. I think it’s fair to say that experienced growers can yield that from HPS as well. And if you are running 3 x 600w HPS for flowering, you would need 10 X 357 magnums to get the same yield. Plus that would cost 7.000 USD$ and not save you 1 wattage of electricity. If I believed I could get 2 grams pr. Watt, I would buy 6 of these in a heartbeat. Really hoping for some more diaries (like
sea of green or screen of green without Co2 to compare it to my own grows)
On the 2nd point, that’s super cool. If they burn with full brightness for 50K hours and does heat up the room, thumbs up to that, but that’s not worth 7.000 USD$ if u ask me.
Link to new ongoing diary: http://www.invalid.com/grow-journals/416863-9-purple-kush-under-360-a.html
Link to old finished .9 gram pr. watt diary: http://www.invalid.com/grow-journals/386508-hempstar-3-stage-led-grow.html