LexLuthor
- Posts
- 2,972
- Reactions
- 2,576
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Points
- 263
Hi Lex,
You make a mistake in my opinion. 1 lx = 1 lm/m2 = 1 cd·sr·m–2.
The 50k is on a square of 1m2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lux
So when 3 400W lamps beam on a 1m2 square at 25cm from the
bulb it is for sure 90k. When you want keep 1 meter between bulb
and plant a 400W can't compete with a 600W but when you reduce
the distance and use more 400W bulbs to get a better light spread
the 400W is better then 600W because you reduce the heat print
on a small spot with the 400W compared to 600W.
Reread my other reply and hope it is clear.
HD
Ok, you never said 3 400w bulbs per m2 in your previous post so you are correct about 90k lum. Now, I can get 2 600w bulbs per m2 and get more penetration compared to 3 400's. So why would you squeeze 3 400's over each m2?? Its not gonna reduce the heat print per m2 when compared to 2 600's because they release the same amount of heat (they both equal 1200w and about 165,000 lum., so based on your theory its better to have 8 150w bulb over 1 m2 because it reduces the heat print on a small spot compared to 3 400's?? Like I said before its still misleading because there is always a trade of with HID's, more intense bulbs equals more heat, even if you cram a bunch of small bulbs together it just ends up building more heat per added bulb.
I'm not gonna go back and forth with you, if you honestly think 400's are the best then use them, but you don't have to go around telling people 400's are better because of less heat. Thats like me saying a 150w HID is better then a 400w because they release less heat. With proper ventilation and cooling the 1000w will outperform all the others per bulb. Have a nice day hennep, peace.