markscastle
Well-Known Farmer
- 4,825
- 263
Maybe. I have the reproduction as well as the original genetics. I think I was as clear as I want to be. There is nothing of interest in this strain for me but to preserve it for now. It`s just part of a vast collection of genetics I hold. I plan on returning to breeding projects in the next few years and maybe doing some vending again. Until then I`m working on my property and don`t have a lot of time to spend on these projects.@markscastle It appears that you have a lot of respect from a lot of the members on this forum and probably for good reason and I'm not trying to be disrespectful, but from my point of view it seems your implying and/or asserting a lot of conflicting/inconsistent things.
Maybe I am just misunderstanding you.
Kryptonite an other great strain just pulled some out of the garden. Not related to OG Kush though. Seems like your on a fishing trip to me. You might ask Swerve as he has guessed the right combination behind OG before. Not saying the strain is mine, but I have reproduced it from it`s components before , was trying to figure out if in fact it might have been mine or not but it wasn`t conclusive because to many other people have the correct genetics and could have also created this strain. I find so many times when I have a good idea , so do others. Can`t tell you how many times I`ve worked on the same crosses as Bohdi or Mota . They seem to be on the same page as me often.
But that implies you know "the cross" and kinda further implies that you created it. Before it was bagseed and now you know the genetic make-up?I simply said he guessed the cross correct and the was in a privet form so if you are not a member there is no way to reference it. I did not say he had the genetics or was able to reproduce OG Kush. You can figure out how to get ahold of him yourself if you wish.
This is the best shit I've heard so far. You can tell dude's (Skunkmasterflex) from Cali, lol (I'm assuming).Iv heard of the original pure kushes get tagged 91 og. Just like I hear sometimes the original bubba kush cut tagged 92 bubba.
Everything said after this point is my own speculation....
I believe og and chem to have similar genetics but I don't think og came from chem directly and if it did it came from dog bud not the chem dog seeds that chem dog found from the dog bud itself. With that being said.... it is extremely possible for og kush to have been around in 91. I think it was around far before that but by different names and the line may have not been worked as long
Iv smoked many og flowers with 91 tagged on them. 91 malibu, 91 fire..ext ext. Most have been pretty fire too. But if you had my guess... that 91 tag is more referring to the pure kushes that are more og not the bubba kush type pure kushes then actual og kush straight up. Like I said though, just the conclusion iv came to based on personal experience and stories iv put together from stuff iv read or heard ~SMF~
But that implies you know "the cross" and kinda further implies that you created it. Before it was bagseed and now you know the genetic make-up?
Virginia Colony and it was the early 1600`s. You of course can rely on your BS meter all you want. I don`t care. I`m not here to impress you. I`m here to share the love of cannabis with who ever wants to. Yep from Cali . It`s a cool State.Its Pheno type not Phenol type. You've been breeding cannabis since the 1950's? Where was your family selling cannabis seeds in the 1700s? My bullshit meter is spiking high with all of your posts.
Why did you quote me in this?Virginia Colony and it was the early 1600`s. You of course can rely on your BS meter all you want. I don`t care. I`m not here to impress you. I`m here to share the love of cannabis with who ever wants to. Yep from Cali . It`s a cool State.
Wtf? I think your confusing me with @WiseGorilla. If your not, wtf? How did you answer my question and when did anyone ask you who you were? Your identity is not what's being called into question here.I just don`t see the need to back anything. The only way I could do so is by affording info that would place my identity at risk. I have a stellar reputation and many people know who I am anyway , so doubt all you want, don`t care. The reason I quoted you was to answer your question and correct the date. Enough said , this is going no where. Maybe someone will vouch for me or something, There`s still a few people who remember Sunshine seeds and a few people who were around Sacred Seeds who would remember me , other than that try to find an old Berkley Barb paper with one of my old adds in it from the library or something. By the way who are you and can you prove it? LOL!
100% correct on they're accuracy brother.But scientificly Impossible as far as cell for cell atom for atom proton for proton etcIt's possible, just HIGHLY unlikely. Even possible "molecularly", just HIGHLY improbable.
Sure, they can create what THEY remember, but how accurate would that be?
Ah, I see what you mean now, but let me ask you this; isn't it possible to recreate something using the exact same atoms (protons, electrons, etc.)? Something we don't have the capability of, but technically possible?100% correct on they're accuracy brother.But scientificly Impossible as far as cell for cell atom for atom proton for proton etc
You guys were both dead on from both your sides.yours was hell naw you didn't create "The"cut.You were right he didnt.
His side was recreated it using understandings of genetics. It's possible as far as human perception.(perceptions can be duplicated 100% scientificly down to the molecular/cellular hell naw)
Both yall are correct an good dudes and growers...I just checked back in to say P.S... F#%_ some other dudes cut he created..I have a voodoo from exoticgenetix(purple alien tahoe x starfighter)that I back crossed and grew a ton of phenos out to find "my" pheno that I wouldn't trade if it ment losing it for 10 other people's legends:) later Bros don't let the bad vibes seep into the grow rooms:)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?