I thought Tardigrades would be a cool topic,,, lol, riots-obama-trump-bernie peeps get ppl talkN lol
Tardigrades are intensely interesting but neither of us know enough to have an thoughtful discussion.
I think I am in love with the idea that anything you disagree with is automatically fake news or alternative facts, and you can't be bothered to back up your own assertions with your own research. That you have yet to post anything other than ridiculously ludicrous and outlandish claims is telling. The absence of proof is proof of truth in your world, and I don't see it that way, but I find it fascinating.
'Nobody will report this' = am night radio conspiracy
What is the difference between a 'Riot' and a 'peaceful protest', as you define them? You seem like you are interested in conversing over the topics you post, but you also seem determined to control the conversation. I'll bite.
You've mentioned paid rioters and paid protesters several times without evidence, and now it's time to put up or to drop it. I have found nothing that substantiates your accusations of mass paid protesters or rioters. It's just not true. I have a feeling you aren't going to post a link to a story or police report or admission of what you accuse, but rather a dismissive retort that ignores my response, because you have nothing to stand on or to back up your claim. For every asshole on the other side of the debate, there is someone like yourself, who refuses to address, discuss, or even admit the possibility that you are pandering. Snopes is easy so here you go -
http://www.snopes.com/paid-protesters-donald-trumps-inauguration/. If you didn't know, snopes has started to lean a bit to the left.
Lino, I see this with my own elderly family, as the internet becomes more involved in our daily lives, it has become obvious that the older generations are not as apt to adapt to new technology as younger folks. I think that sometimes people read things that are satire, and they can't tell the difference. I think you genuinely believe that the right pays people to riot, break laws, disrupt peaceful protests, etc. You are welcome to your beliefs lino, but you are wrong. Is this the proof you depend on for your claims of paid protesters? You aren't going to post a link because this is something you already know to be true, so why bother confirming it with some other asshole on the internet?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/huppke/ct-paid-protesters-huppke-20170227-story.html
Who is allowing riots to happen, and why? I think your accusation is disingenuous, and the implication that the left is paying for and allowing violence is pretty disturbing for you to claim. Keep in mind that we probably voted for the same person. I don't mind that you dislike the left, I mind that you practice spreading misinformation and hysteria. I don't think you understand the full implication of the dreamhost story or what it would mean for you and your privacy moving forward. I would very much like to have a discussion about that, but it can't be political, because it affects everyone. I'll let you decide if you want to take that on or leave it. I'll say again, it's not the partisan issue you claim it to be. I don't think you want those scary antifa people gaining access to your computer, files, browsing history, etc, because that's what the dreamhost decision implies. You should care now while it doesn't affect you instead of ignoring it or dismissing it as a non-victory for non-republicans.
Is this where you get your 'evidence' of cheating during the debates? I'm curious if you have anything other than the words in your head to back up your assertions that you make. Lino, you're pretty loose with the details, and when you make vague claims without backing them up, it nearly negates your argument into nothing.
lol at 'we actually shot americans for that' Lino you are amazeballs