Actual Available PPM Analysis: Bloom Boosters

  • Thread starter desertsquirrel
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
desertsquirrel

desertsquirrel

1,177
83
I started this thread because I see an increasing number of people looking to improve their grows by trying a new nutrient line or product when in fact there is little to no correlation between plant health and any one product or line. Instead, there is a direct correlation between the nutrient profile you develop with your line and the health of the plants being profiled.

I will however deal with nutrient profiles and their application more in depth in another thread that covers whole nutrient lines. The basis of this thread will be understanding N-P-K guaranteed total analysis, actual available ppm analysis, and how to apply that understanding to a variety of bloom boosters on the market.

First, let me start by saying ppm meters do not measure parts per million. Ppm meters measure Electric conductivity which is then converted (different meters convert at different rates) into a “ppm figure.” As if the conversion factor was not inaccurate enough, meters measure total EC. This means along with the elements available for plant up-take the meter is also reading dissolved solids that are dyes, preservatives, fillers, or anything else that happens to be in the solution. For these reasons meters contain an inherently unacceptable level of error for the use of nutrient profiles and we must turn to math for these purposes.

Developing nutrient profiles from scratch begins with the guaranteed total analysis or the N-P-K listed on each nutrient label. By law the numbers listed for N-P-K are listed in percents and are a percentage of the total amount of nutrient. For example 0-50-30 means the nutrient contains 0% total N, 50% total P, and 30% total K. These numbers however are often misleading because total N, total P and total K is not the same as available N, available P and available k.

Now, plants are only able to uptake elements that are both 1) inorganic, and 2) in their most simple ionic form. In the case of N, P, and K those forms are NO3, and NH4 (N); HPO4 (P); and K+ (K). So, before Guaranteed total analysis can be converted into an actual available ppm analysis you must identify the forms of N-P-K that are provided and the percentage at which they oxidize into forms that are usable by the plants.

In the case of the boosters in question N is provided as NO3 and no conversion is necessary. P is converted from P2O5 at a rate of 43.6% useable (HPO4) P. And K is converted from K2O at a rate of 83% useable (K+) K.

Now that we have our oxidization rates we can begin with solutions. Because ml/mg per liter is already in ppm the starting point is there. 1g per liter means 1000 ppm have been added to solution. So, divide the 1000 ppm by the N-P-K ratios to find the guaranteed total ppm. Then, total ppms are divided by available forms of the element. Then the actual available ppm is divided by 3.785 to arrive at the actual available ppm analysis for 1g per gallon of each booster.

Here is the math:

Guaranteed Total analysis:
Guaranteed Total analysis: Open sesame
N 5
P 45
K 19

Guaranteed Total analysis: Beastie bloomz
N 0
P 50
K 30

Guaranteed Total analysis: Cha-Ching
N 9
P 50
K 10

Guaranteed Total analysis: Moab
N 0
P 50
K 30

Garanteed Total analysis: Shooting Powder
N 0
P 9
K 20


mg/ml per liter is ppm:

1g/liter total ppm: Open sesame
N 50
P 450
K 190

1g/liter total ppm: Beastie bloomz
N 0
P 500
K 300

1g/liter total ppm: Cha-Ching
N 90
P 500
K 100

1g/liter total ppm: Moab
N 0
P 500
K 300

1g/liter total ppm: Shooting Powder
N 0
P 90
K 200

In these cases N-P-K are provided as N: (NO3) P: (P2O5) K: (K2O). However plants can only uptake elements in their most simple (inorganic) ionic form. So N is up takable in the forms of NO3 and NH4, P in the form of HPO4 and K in the form of K+. In the case of P, 43.6% of P2O5 oxidizes into usable HPO4. In the case of K, 83% of the K2O becomes the usable form K+.

Actual Available ppm:
1g/liter actual available ppm: Open sesame
N 50 X 1 = 50
P 450 X .436 = 196.2
K 190 X.83 = 157.7

1g/liter actual available ppm: Beastie bloomz
N 0
P 500 X .436 = 218
K 300 X.83 = 249

1g/liter actual available ppm: Cha-Ching
N 90 X 1 = 90
P 500 X .436 = 218
K 100 X .83 = 83

1g/liter actual available ppm: Moab
N 0
P 500 X .436 = 218
K 300 X.83 = 249

1g/liter actual available ppm: Shooting Powder
N 0
P 90 X .436 = 39.24
K 200 X .83 = 166

And from 1 liter to 1 gallon: (/3.785)

1g/gal actual available ppm: Open sesame
N 50 X 1 = 50 =13.21
P 450 X .436 = 196.2 = 51.84
K 190 X.83 = 157.7 = 41.66

1g/liter actual available ppm: Beastie bloomz
N 0 = 0
P 500 X .436 = 218 = 56.8
K 300 X.83 = 249 = 65.78

1g/liter actual available ppm: Cha-Ching
N 90 X 1 = 90 = 23.78
P 500 X .436 = 218 = 57.60
K 100 X .83 = 83 = 21.93

1g/liter actual available ppm: Moab
N 0 = 0
P 500 X .436 = 218 = 56.8
K 300 X.83 = 249 = 65.78

1g/liter actual available ppm: Shooting Powder
N 0
P 90 X .436 = 39.24 = 10.37
K 200 X .83 = 166 = 43.86

So, 1 gram per gallon of these products yields the following actual available ppm nutrient profiles:

Final Actual available ppm analysis (1g per gallon):

Open sesame:
N 13.21
P 51.84
K 41.66

Beastie bloomz:
N 0
P 56.8
K 65.78

Cha-Ching:
N 23.78
P 57.60
K 21.93

Moab:
N 0
P 56.8
K 65.78

Shooting Powder:
N 0
P 10.37
K 43.86
 
squarepusher

squarepusher

959
43
Isn't shooting powder 0-39-25?
shooting_powder.jpg


Also, beyond ppm, many of these products may contain other non fertilizer ingredients, like plant extracts, amino acids, etc...
 
Capulator

Capulator

likes to smell trees.
Supporter
6,070
313
I read that HG is diluting their line in new packaging.

Good post DS.

BTW I physan'd another crop but only let it cycle once in the ebb&flo (abotu 10 min)after noticing more brown algae. Then I flushed. Then added EWC tea. The EWC tea KILLS it. My plants responded to it immediately. Pushed new roots out of the brown ones in less than 3 days.

THEN I BLEACHED THE SHIT OUT OF EVERYTHING IN THE ROOM.
 
drknockbootz

drknockbootz

135
28
Yea, my shooting powder reads 0-9-20 as well. But I always wondered why other peoples post always showed a higher P than K with their shooting powder.

What do I multiply to find the ppm of (cal/mag/sulfur)?
 
phenotyper

phenotyper

851
63
How do you account for the other additives in the calculation?
 
desertsquirrel

desertsquirrel

1,177
83
Yea, my shooting powder reads 0-9-20 as well. But I always wondered why other peoples post always showed a higher P than K with their shooting powder.

What do I multiply to find the ppm of (cal/mag/sulfur)?

there is minimal if any Ca/Mg/S if any in these boosters. do you mean how do you do nutrient profiles for base nutes? ill post that in a few days, its alot more work.
 
drknockbootz

drknockbootz

135
28
Yea I was wondering how to get the correct numbers from reading the labels(cal/mag) in base nutes?
 
desertsquirrel

desertsquirrel

1,177
83
Here it is at 10 ml/gal. if you want to play with it move the decimals and its 1 ml/gal.

Botanicare Cal Mag Plus (2-0-0) Mg1.2% Ca3.2% Fe.1% 1.0208 g/mL @10mL/Gal
N 54
P0
K0
Mg 32
Ca 86
Fe 2.7
Derived from: Calcium Nitrate, Magnesium Nitrate, Iron EDTA.
 
G

greenbastards

19
0
Hey Desertsquirrel,
I really appreciate your post its very helpful in comparing all these PK boosters. Have you ever done an analysis on Supernatural's Budblaster. Because on my ingredients list, is says it has 3 different types of phosphates and its a 1-52-31.... And it says its Available phosphates is 52%..... It says its derived from: Mono-potassium phosphate, Di-ammonium phosphate, super phosphate and mono ammonium phosphate.

Do you think theirs more available with the Budblaster?? I've always gotten unbelievable results.....
 
SweetTooth

SweetTooth

248
28
DS,

So overall during your bloom booster analysis what were your overall findings in your opinion of the best bloom booster on the market (out of the ones listed). Or do you not recommend the use of a bloom booster at all and to just stick with a good base nutrient.
 
desertsquirrel

desertsquirrel

1,177
83
In an effort to do a full grow without the myth of high p my current profile is riding at 25ish p and I'm not boosting it. I should have pics up tonight, but here is the thread:



When I am boosting i use the FF boosters (OS, BB, and CC) and usually boost the above profile about 1-1.2g/gal for 4 days before rez changes. The first one at the onset of flowers, second one mid flower (swelling) and the last one is pre-flush and in conjunction with a mgs04 boost for resin.

However the profile alone seems to be achieving the same results.

That being said mono potassium Phosphate is mono potassium phosphate - no one has a line on a rare form or any of that crap its all the same.

So the booster choice should be focused on who offers the mono cheapest and what else is provided in the product. This is where FF shines IMO. Trace minerals like Iron, Zinc and Manganese, Plant Growth stimulators, and even Kelp among other things can all be found in there boosters.
 
MendoCruz

MendoCruz

447
43
I read that HG is diluting their line in new packaging.

Good post DS.

BTW I physan'd another crop but only let it cycle once in the ebb&flo (abotu 10 min)after noticing more brown algae. Then I flushed. Then added EWC tea. The EWC tea KILLS it. My plants responded to it immediately. Pushed new roots out of the brown ones in less than 3 days.

THEN I BLEACHED THE SHIT OUT OF EVERYTHING IN THE ROOM.

They repackaged their products with American label standards.
 
Snowblind

Snowblind

Kush Mints x Animal Cookie Bx2 Specialist
Supporter
1,074
163
Crop King and JR Peters labs are good place to buy cheap bloom boosters.....

This is a pretty good list between the 2 place to buy raw salts......
 
nuttso

nuttso

443
43
i'm no expert in nutes. but infact i think that the main reason for moab and shooting powder to work ain't pk it's the plant hormones in there that kicks it like this.
 
HG23

HG23

204
28
In the case of the boosters in question N is provided as NO3 and no conversion is necessary. P is converted from P2O5 at a rate of 43.6% useable (HPO4) P. And K is converted from K2O at a rate of 83% useable (K+) K.

Hey DS,

I'm in the process of figuring out nutrient profiling. I have a feeling you derived the oxidation rates of P and K from their atomic mass numbers (or weights?) Can you explain?

Also, in the thread called "Cheap alternatives to overpriced hydroponic nutrients" you list the profile for the Jack's fertilizer as so:

GUARANTEED ANALYSIS F1313 Total nitrogen (N) .................................................. ........ 5%
5.00% nitrate nitrogen Available phosphate (P2O5) ............................................. 12% Soluble potash (K2O) .................................................. .... 26%

130 oz / 1000 gal
3705 g / 3785 l

3705000 mg / 3785 l = 979 ppm

N 979 X .05 = 48.95
P 979 X .12 = 117.48
K 979 X .26 = 254.54

N 49+ 101 = 150
P 118 X .436 = 51
K 254.54 X .83 = 211

Actual available PPM:
N 150
P 51
K 211

Or 3-1-4

Why are you adding the 101 to the PPM for Nitrogen? (nitrate is NO3 right?)

Edit: Just read further and realized that the 101 is probably from the Calcium Nitrate that is rated 15.5-0-0. If you could still explain how you got the number I would appreciate it.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom