T
toquer
- Posts
- 460
- Reactions
- 793
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2010
- Points
- 93
I hear ya loud and clear on that. I don't like using them but it's very carefully timed. They don't get it too young and since the application of one back to the original one is 30 days apart on a minimum; as I try to rotate azamax and axatrol too. Most plants don't live long enough in veg to have gotten through the cycle more than once.All three products are single-site mode of action miticides, none should be used more than twice in a given plant's lifetime, all are proven to cause resistance in mites.
Just wanted to put that out there. :)
Dud vs non dud gsc, I'll let you guess which is which. Heh.
View attachment 407664
View attachment 407665
w just a single branch like that? they are under 600's, i doubt too much light, last feed was 1.5... did have boost though
That's a great gardening info site Chinook. Thanks for the heads up on that site. Put it in my faves for easy access too.I think your more likely on to something then it being tmv in all these dif gardens.but heres some bad info on tmv.
Control
Unlike fungicidal chemicals used to control fungal diseases, to date there are no efficient chemical treatments that protect plant parts from virus infection. Additionally, there are no known chemical treatments used under field conditions that eliminate viral infections from plant tissues once they do occur. Practically speaking, plants infected by viruses remain so. Thus, control of tobacco mosaic virus is primarily focused on reducing and eliminating sources of the virus and limiting the spread by insects. Tobacco mosaic virus is the most persistent plant virus known. It has been known to survive up to 50 years in dried plant parts. Therefore, sanitation is the single most important practice in controlling tobacco mosaic virus.
you can read the whole study here
its a pretty reliable source I use for general garden questions sometimes.but tmv would not be limited or worse in indoor gardens from what I have read so far.sure hope it doesn't get my train wreck babies.
What if its a DNA/RNA problem that has been bred into some strains from overbreeding, you know , cousin variety X cousin variety , Mom strain X son strain , Dad variety x Niece variety, etc...? That could be the problem. This could be something that is a genetic defect that slipped into the OG gene pool and rears it head on some variety's or strains, and not others depending on if the "Dud' gene is dominant. Anybody think of that? Tobacco Maize Virus is a nightmare too and that travels with the cut into your garden and other gardens and spreads to your other plants like bird flu.
Bluzboy
very tough if not impossible for the hobby grower to do ... and anyone with the capital to pull it off isn't going to be passing the clean plant stock out ..i have a theory i would like to test.
freshly divided primordial undifferentiated apical meristem cells as they emerge are free from the host plants viruses in most cases.
these cells as they emerge are said to be free of the host plants pathogens for dozens of hours.
in strawberry nursery stock, it is the standard for clearing viruses and other pathogens to perform a special type of in vitro tissue culture called MICROtip culture.
you may be familiar with MACROtip tissue culture and have likely seen the home tissue culture kits for sale online.
this is not quite the same however very similar. this requires a very small sample (<1mm) of just the emerging cells of the meristem. it is usually done by someone with practice in this precision cut done under at least 80x magnification. the explant is then sterilized and placed in culture in a medium containing shoot induction hormones in a petri dish much like a macrotip culture. the incubation time is much longer and is therefore much more susceptible to infection/contamination of petris. while this is fairly impractical at home it can be done in a lab setting by a trained tech with the right equipment and knowledge of protocols.
i think if this is a pathogen from bms be it viral fungal bacterial etc it could be cleared and resume regular growth given it is reintroduced to a clean environment. i am currently trying to locate a confirmed dud by a reliable source with an intimate knowledge of the syndrome on which i can conduct this experiment and feel confident im working with the correct problem and not a new growers poor growing style instead of the actual duds.
thoughts?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?