QuindariousGooch
- 72
- 33
IMO your ppm/ec may be too low. Try top-feeding with 500-600 ppm and see if they start to open up and stems start greening. I've seen heat and low humidity shut them down like this too but you have that dialed in. I would be interested to hear what happens if you try the top-feeding to "wake them up". If that works increase the reservoir. You might even push the ppm's on 1 plant to see if more is better in your system.
For reference on using higher ppm...
We pop seeds and start clones in 1250ppm (500 scale) in rockwool. We run veg and moms on the same water. Our best results on popping seeds was 1000 to 1300 range...We soak the block in it initially, place the dry seed into and A-OK and put that into the 1250ppm soaked block. Then we water 1x daily with 1250ppm. No humidity dome for seeds and we put them in the same light the moms are getting. Used to be HID and HPS but now we are LED in clone and veg. The seeds will adapt to whatever environment they pop into. The key is keeping them watered. They can take all the light you can give them if they have the transpiration rate to handle it.
Before anyone calls bullshit on the above process I encourage you to try it. I only mentioned it to give an opening to the idea that higher ppm than the charts say can produce better results. I realize I'm a rockwool grower and DWC is known to be different...but what if it's not so different? What if higher ppm's are better in this case? I'm not saying this is the answer rather give it a try/test.
For reference we run 1300-1400 clones every 2 weeks and 20-50 seeds (or 1-2 cultivars) every 4-6 weeks. All clones & seeds are run at a minimum of 1250ppm right out of the gate and continue through the veg cycle. I won't even mention what ppm we run in flower but it's "a bit" higher than 1250ppm. I used to get great results in coco pearlite at 600-1000 max and used to be skeptical about higher numbers so I understand growers who might push back on this methodology. I welcome debate if it is based on data and testing. Opinions are fun to listen to but I have learned to test all changes vs immediately implementing because it seems to make sense. Free advise is worth what you pay and should always be vigorously vetted based on the downside risk. That's why I suggested the top feed vs bumping the whole rez up. See what happens on 1 plant. If it works or doesn't you have learned something.
Iron sharpens Iron... Let me know if you try it and if so I would love to hear your results.
Cheers,
Q
For reference on using higher ppm...
We pop seeds and start clones in 1250ppm (500 scale) in rockwool. We run veg and moms on the same water. Our best results on popping seeds was 1000 to 1300 range...We soak the block in it initially, place the dry seed into and A-OK and put that into the 1250ppm soaked block. Then we water 1x daily with 1250ppm. No humidity dome for seeds and we put them in the same light the moms are getting. Used to be HID and HPS but now we are LED in clone and veg. The seeds will adapt to whatever environment they pop into. The key is keeping them watered. They can take all the light you can give them if they have the transpiration rate to handle it.
Before anyone calls bullshit on the above process I encourage you to try it. I only mentioned it to give an opening to the idea that higher ppm than the charts say can produce better results. I realize I'm a rockwool grower and DWC is known to be different...but what if it's not so different? What if higher ppm's are better in this case? I'm not saying this is the answer rather give it a try/test.
For reference we run 1300-1400 clones every 2 weeks and 20-50 seeds (or 1-2 cultivars) every 4-6 weeks. All clones & seeds are run at a minimum of 1250ppm right out of the gate and continue through the veg cycle. I won't even mention what ppm we run in flower but it's "a bit" higher than 1250ppm. I used to get great results in coco pearlite at 600-1000 max and used to be skeptical about higher numbers so I understand growers who might push back on this methodology. I welcome debate if it is based on data and testing. Opinions are fun to listen to but I have learned to test all changes vs immediately implementing because it seems to make sense. Free advise is worth what you pay and should always be vigorously vetted based on the downside risk. That's why I suggested the top feed vs bumping the whole rez up. See what happens on 1 plant. If it works or doesn't you have learned something.
Iron sharpens Iron... Let me know if you try it and if so I would love to hear your results.
Cheers,
Q