Emergency Legislation To Discourage Enactment Of Local Bans

  • Thread starter geologic
  • Start date
  • Tagged users None
geologic

geologic

Old Pharmer
Supporter
1,912
263
Governor Jerry Brown on Wednesday, February 3, signed legislation that seeks to dissuade California cities and counties from enacting municipal restrictions on the cultivation and dispensing of medical marijuana. The measure takes immediate effect.

Assembly Bill 21 amends a drafting error in The Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act by removing an apparent March 1, 2016 deadline for localities to establish their own cultivation regulations or else forfeit that authority to the state. It also removes objectionable language authorizing local governments to prohibit patients from cultivating, storing, donating, or processing marijuana for their own personal use, and by doing so, reaffirms that qualified patients have the right under state law to engage in personal cultivation absent a city or state license.

In recent months, numerous California cities and counties have hastily enacted provisional bans on medical marijuana-related activities out of fear that the state would become to sole authority on the issue following the March 1 deadline. Passage of AB 21 states that localities retain the ability to regulate medical marijuana production and commerce in the manner that they see best. The hope is that localities will halt efforts to impose restrictions, and will reconsider existing moratoriums, now that it is clear that local lawmakers will continue to possess the authority to legislate the issue beyond March 1, 2016. The passage of this legislation "gives local governments time to develop thoughtful policies for regulation," California NORML Director Dale Gieringer said in a statement.

Further information on both pending and enacted local ordinances,
as well as talking points to best address them--
is available from California NORML...
 
MajorPrune

MajorPrune

69
33
Now we'll see if my town reverses the one they just passed. They claim that they were only banning everything but care-provider-deliveries for this emergency to "keep local control". Now that the threat is gone, will the new ban be too?
 
Top Bottom