Log In Register

Flushing is a bad practice based on flawed science.

  • Thread starter Thread starter YarraSparra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Flushing is a bad practice based on flawed science.

YarraSparra 567 Replies 149,641 Views
Page 4 of 29 · Replies 61–80 of 568
The premise of flushing during the last week is that it’s supposed to get the plant to use up its own internal supply of nutrients as it doesn’t need any more for the final week of bud maturation. But this doesn’t stack up in my books.
 
I dump once a week. When I ran coco I’d flush once a week for a couple of hours during their night cycle. I advocate for this because you get nutrient imbalances that a cf meter can’t read. But this is different to flushing for a week at the end of harvest.

do you think flushing 1 x every week with coco is a bit ocd?
 
flushing coco every week is only overkill if ur already getin plenty of runoff
 
If you have a high ratio of perlite in your coco you can increase run off and not worry about water logging and then not have to worry about flushing too often.

Yeah but then do you recollect the runoff and reuse it? Otherwise that an awful waste of nutrients?
 
I like to question everything. Not going to stop flushing unless I see some really good reason. To me a flush is ph'd ro for atleast 10 days, enough so you get a little runoff. I check the drainoff ppm's. And like to see the leaves fade some. Really not sure what to think about this less is more in nutrients theory, given it a go for a couple runs now. I cut back the calcium and the nitrogen early on, pump up the p and k and s comes along with that.
 
Page 4 of 29 · Replies 61–80 of 568
Back
Top Bottom