I was told that the paclo used in these products are such miniscule amounts that they should cause no harm. The research being circulated is a study with paclo at very high amounts not found in paclo additives. Also paclo is used on the very products purchased at the supermarket. ??? The guy who told me this is one of the most informed people I have ever met on the subject of growing and bases his information from scholarly papers, and scientific research.
what are your thoughts on what I was told??? its some food for thought
More like toxins for thought.......instead of "food for thought".....but anyhow my FIRST thought was that "your guy" is not as informed as you might think, in fact he seems to be the opposite of what I would consider to be "informed" by his comments about supermarkets of today.
My second thought was that just because lots of people do something (supermarkets), that does not make it right or safe.....that is
exactly the kind of thinking that got us in trouble to start with...I mean look back at the science history of things......how many things were we WRONG about?? The earth being flat, the earth was the center of the universe....ect...
The bottom line is this: They do not know what the long term affects of these products are at ANY amounts or levels of concentration......they have not be around long enough for this.....
Organic farmers are now finding things like jet fuel in the crops from all the airline planes flying over fields constantly for many years.....for many years this was not a problem.....the SMALL AMOUNTS of jet fuel that was falling from the sky was not a problem several years ago.....TODAY IT IS DESTROYING OUR CROPS AND CONTAMINATING OUR FOOD SUPPLIES!!!
Guess what the "research" studies shows??? That in SMALL AMOUNTS IT IS NOT HARMFUL!!
You should read my post in this thread, post number 15 about the Gerson Miracle.....it talks about exactly the same thing....proof from science research.....yet the doctors STILL say there is NO PROOF!!
Have you thought for just one second that these people telling you it is ok to use and SAFE at lower levels might have a alternate objective???
For every research paper you can come up with saying it is safe at lower levels, you can find just as many showing a OPPOSITE proving study....
I say it comes down to COMMON SENSE, why use it if it is a risk at all?? Why not use BETTER methods?? Like using a ACT tea or something to produce the desired affects...plenty of grows showing how it DEGRADES QUALITY! Is not that enough of a reason???
And to use the supermarket as your point of reference??? That is just silly...do you realize how many people are upset because of the POISONS found in our grocery store foods?? Ever hear about
IN ALL OTHER COUNTRIES EXCEPT FOR THE USA AND CANADA there is a law stating you MUST identify foods that have been genetically modified......nobody in Europe will buy the food marked this way unless they are starving....we are to stupid over in the USA to worry about such things I guess.....
Most that really understand this problem realize that "we the people" are being used as lab rats for there food experiments.....you see the earth can only support about 2.5 billion people, that is all there are resources for...PERIOD. It is SIMPLE MATH! Yet currently the population is at 8 billion and rising faster than EVER before.....there is not enough food....that is why GMO's were invented in the first place, grow more food FASTER.....and even worse they modify the gene structure to be resistant to poisons and pest......
They are fucking with something that took evolution millions of years to accomplish.
Most people also understand VERY little about plant nutrition in general.....they do not see products like Pure Flowers for what they REALLY are, a pesticide used to treat plants with....instead they see it as a "Bloom Booster"....how messed up is that??
Lots of people do not know what a "systemic" type product even is, or what it does, or how it works....SM 90 is a the proof I goto for this point.....how many people use SM-90 consistently through out the growing cycles......using a systemic type product without even knowing what it is or that it is even a systemic type product is just plain stupid......the products should be CLEARLY MARKED for starters.....
They are finding mutation in plants NEVER seen before, we are playing with something we know VERY LITTLE about or understand......the science community for example currently thinks that most of genetic code is "junk code"......we know how untrue that is now.....the science world even thought the earth was flat at one point......
I would not put much faith or hope is ANY research paper telling you something you KNOW is fundamentally not SAFE......bottom line.
Just about all growers who have EVER used these products has stated that they thought the quality was degraded....even ill eagle has said this.....and then in the same breath he ask what the danger is if any, and for someone to PROVE that it is dangerous and not a wise product to use on a food type crop?? HUH???