Capulator
likes to smell trees.
Supporter
- 6,070
- 313
Definitely agree on that being an easy and most likely accurate assumption. I wouldn't be surprised if it was to protect themselves against a cannabis related suit though because apparently we're the only farmers actively concerned with Paclo and consumables.
Big company like GH getting sued by the equivelant of a cannabis collective in the med industry = Way too much publicity for a company that tends to steer clear of anything med related.
No idea if this is true or not, but just something that popped into my head.
Just finished using this in my Veg+Bloom thread
Can someone prove to me that 1ml in 5 gallons of nute feed at week 2 applied once in my plants life is cancerous? Quality wise the Veg+Bloom buds were better quality but, Bushload, like it or not, produces results unlike a lot of bullshit on the market. I would say it is worth a shot especially for lanky ass OGs and what have you's. The Veg+Bloom solo buds where a bit fluffier but more sugar sapped but the weight of these paclo driven buds is like lead rocks and will be extra appealing in end weight.View attachment 271719View attachment 271720
None taken, but I don't necessarily see what is laughable.LOL at cannabis related suit... It will be a long time before that happens. No offense.
None taken, but I don't necessarily see what is laughable.
The potential for a large collective to be sued for poisoining their patients and choosing to pass the buck to the people who didn't specify that the product was absolutely under any circumstances unacceptable for consumable goods (hence the "ornamental only"). It's for GH's protection in my opinion, not all because of the product inside. It's like McDonalds and other places putting the heat warnings on things, some people just like to protect themselves from any liability issues, especially with something that can easily be over applied and throw their "safe for consumables" thing out the window.
There are easily $1,000,000+ collectives out there, why wouldn't it make sense for a legal entity to sue another legal entity for damages to their company through false advertising. It would be a state case if I'm not mistaken.
I agree with you. I just don't see collectives suing anyone other than the state or county they are trying to operate in that's all.
I was told that the paclo used in these products are such miniscule amounts that they should cause no harm. The research being circulated is a study with paclo at very high amounts not found in paclo additives. Also paclo is used on the very products purchased at the supermarket. ??? The guy who told me this is one of the most informed people I have ever met on the subject of growing and bases his information from scholarly papers, and scientific research.
what are your thoughts on what I was told??? its some food for thought
I think that statement about ornamental is there to please the states. As long as that statement is on there and the ingredient paclobutrazol is not hidden. It can be sold
I think until we really find out what the outcome of all these PGR's really do, its kind of unfair for someone to use them for the sake of their own intentions.
I know that I couldn't drop some meds off at a spense and walk away not knowing what the effects might have later on in someone else's life.
Just me though.......
there is a rather large subsect of commercial growers, especially in cali, that still go to hydro stores looking for, and often finding, phosphoload... this is an attempt by gh to steal away some of that business... they don't care about the grower or what they are growing; they care about stuffing more money into their pockets... for that reason i boycott gh and all of their products when it comes to my garden
... they don't care about the grower or what they are growing; they care about stuffing more money into their pockets...
that's too bad, sounds like you need to think about where you put your money, doesn't have to be in the corps pockets. Alvarado Street Bakery, google that shit.I don't know of ANY company that thinks differently, its the world we live in bro.
I look at it two ways:
Lets look at alcohol.
If you consume 1 alcoholic beverage a day you"shouldn't" end up with internal problems.
If you like to drink out of moderation, then most likely you will end up with some internal problem/s.
I think the difference is that, you are doing it to yourself.
Lets also look at smoking
For the longest time everybody had no idea that second hand smoke was as bad for others as it is.
Now you cant smoke anywhere, anymore, because your decision to smoke effects others.
I guess what I am saying, is that if anyone uses these products for their personal smoke then I don't think anyone has a problem with that.
Using them and knowing whats in it to benefit their bank account, just doesn't make sense to me.
that's too bad, sounds like you need to think about where you put your money, doesn't have to be in the corps pockets. Alvarado Street Bakery, google that shit.
yes it is still available. saw it online earlier broIts the EXACT same thing as Bushmaster. I've used Dr. Nodes but it isn't available on the market anymore...haha I still have a secret stash...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?