THCFarmer.com
121,295 Members Log In Register
Log In Register

getting sucked in by hombolts own gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter audius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

getting sucked in by hombolts own gravity

audius 31 Replies 7,432 Views
Page 2 of 2 · Replies 21–32 of 32
K

kes5480

Guest
#22
i believe Audius started this thread. he was the one asking how 2 use gravity....thats it.

Audius,
My opinion is i wouldnt use it due to what i have read about that product. so thats just me, everyone else can use it if they want just dont smoke that shit with me. No offense to anyone that wants to smoke that chemical but i dont. I'll just sit back and see if there are any long term effects that happen to the people using that product and smokin the bud from a plant fed gravity.
I dont want to see or hear about anyone getting sick from this and that is why i recomend not using it. No reason what so ever to get mad about it.
love and peace to all
grow grow grow:flower
KEs
 
#23
These types of products instantly "commercialize" herb.

Taste & trich production will never be the same, but you yield more.

Dank herb has a strange way of disappearing fast. Commercial herb fills "clubs" and is

everywhere!!

Please grow dank :)
 
#24
OK reading every post. Does this product work? I just got dont picking few bottles up because it seem cheaper then OverDrive witch would do the same job as from what i have learn from others. Just never used Gravity till my hand got a hold of it few weeks ago...
 
#25
kes5480 said:
i believe Audius started this thread. he was the one asking how 2 use gravity....thats it.

Audius,
My opinion is i wouldnt use it due to what i have read about that product. so thats just me, everyone else can use it if they want just dont smoke that shit with me. No offense to anyone that wants to smoke that chemical but i dont. I'll just sit back and see if there are any long term effects that happen to the people using that product and smokin the bud from a plant fed gravity.
I dont want to see or hear about anyone getting sick from this and that is why i recomend not using it. No reason what so ever to get mad about it.
love and peace to all
grow grow grow:flower
KEs
Click to expand...

RIGHT. & I DID stop USING IT. Im not about bringing bad karma with my smoke. now im all about the big hard nugs as everybody else but not at that expence.:pimp:
 
#26
your high bro, ur smoking to much gravity filled nutrients, the carcinogens they are talking about is not what already in the smoke, but what those nutrients do to the smoke, they add a substantial amount of carbon dioxide, replace your joint with the muffler of a car, that how MUCH MORE carbon is ADDED when USING these products, and no your patients and clients do not deserve that nasty chemical crap
 
#27
Toxicokinetics
In the rat, absorption was rapid and extensive (88-95%) and did not show saturation at a high
dose. Absorbed material was readily oxidized to PBZ diol, which was subject either to excretion
or to further oxidation to the carboxylic acid. Biotransformation was limited to the tertiary butyl
moiety, with no metabolism detected in either the triazole or chlorinated phenyl rings. Male rats
oxidized a greater proportion of PBZ to the carboxylic acid than did female rats.
A small proportion of radioactivity equilibrated into the tissues and was subsequently eliminated.
The highest concentrations of radioactivity were seen in the liver after a high or low dose. There
was no evidence of bioaccumulation.
 
#29
I read that when paclo was first banned in America for apples....the apple farmers went NUTS.

It was such a huge tool for their production....it hurt them when it was removed.

To continue reading...the reason it was banned...When they tested the apples there were 5 ppms of paclo in an apple. If had been 4 ppm.....it would have passed.

Justsaying
 
#31
sedate said:
busy calling peepz you don't know unethical and shit and blabbing misinformed nonsense from rambling cut/pasted emails sourced from fuck-knows where.
Click to expand...
I know where. AN just started another campaign the other week. Probably did a year ago, too.
 
#32
DJCBD said:
the carcinogens they are talking about is not what already in the smoke, but what those nutrients do to the smoke, they add a substantial amount of carbon dioxide, replace your joint with the muffler of a car, that how MUCH MORE carbon is ADDED when USING these products
Click to expand...


There is probably 75% of smokers who smoked bud containing pgr's sometime in there life without knowing. Comparing minuscule amounts of pgr's to inhaling exhaust from a vehicle is the same as saying smoking 1 cigarette is equal to drinking a cup of bleach, NOT TRUE.
 
Page 2 of 2 · Replies 21–32 of 32
Back
Top Bottom