singa
- 22
- 3
I would go by what the plants are telling you honestly. I've dialed things up close on the plant, but certainly how you've got them right now in veg there probably fine. Those lights are certainly high powered. I'm just used to blasting them fully, that's all. I think for efficiency sake, the closer they'll tolerate the better, overall. Thus the idea of the spider type grow panels, because the quantum were far too tight intense foot print.I'm confused on the light distance really. I used to be all in into keeping the lights as close as possible from start but noticed vey short and bushy grow following by low harvest on my previous grow.
This time having the light so close, beside short grow I also noticed taco leaves which I thought comes from the light source being to close however it could be related more to heat. What do you think?
thats another term for epsom salt right?mag sulfate foliar
Nah, I'm saying the epsom will address the interveinal chlorosis in the leaves....thats another term for epsom salt right?
are you saying it will kill the infection?
and sorry, 1 mag? you get me lost.
im from land of smiles, perhaps don't get the language right :)
Exactly! I have never see that on my previous grows (4).Yea, overall they look fine, just a little droopy and not very well engaged as I would normally like to see.
Yea, I kinda figured that my be the case, but there's some other signs there also present, so it's no doubt an issue to some degree. Maybe even dare I say, clawing which indicates a possible nitrogen excess. Or perhaps more nitrogen than is being currently absorbed though photosynthesis. Looks like a bottleneck of sorts, actually. ie. in relation to nutrient uptake, vs transpiration vs photosynthesis.Exactly! I have never see that on my previous grows (4).
also they are not droppy like that normaly. The pictures were taken just after watering during dark period.
I will post some more pictures once the lights go on and lets hope they stretch leaves upwards...
the pH reads around 7.4But, you need to raise the pH, so you don't fuck up the plants.... with a pH that's acidic. Raise it.. so it imparts a therapeutic response in the plant. ie. gives it some fungal protection. Higher pH is optimal for that nutrient uptake, plus will have the side benefit of mitigating any fungal development.
Don't understand what you mean exactly. Sorryyou give it in the root zone, leave it as is... But those plants look sorta soggy to begin with.
Well that is telling...
The plants look droopy, they look like the bottoms have been perpetually wet, for the most part and not allowed a natural wet dry cycle. Plants need a drought cycle. Too much moisture in the base is bad bad double bad.Don't understand what you mean exactly. Sorry
Personally, I think bloomer is a bit premature, actually. Leave that first dose for now, and maybe do half doses for the first week. Certainly don't be piling on phosphorus yet, it's not there. Mag Sulfate, and Calcium is what your needing right now, actually. Perhaps in a week or so.Also...
Do you still think they are veging after i posted close up pictures?
I noticed white hairs few days ago. I just switched the base fertilizer to bloomer today.
I would bet on it as well as i saw leaves crowling down on few plants after TNT Complex from the Hesi line. This one has a reputation of being to strong.Maybe even dare I say, clawing which indicates a possible nitrogen excess
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?