soserthc1
- Posts
- 7,039
- Reactions
- 19,302
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2011
- Points
- 313
thank you sir .... and yes Tystick handled it well but was worried about were it could of headed but thanks to good old 20% + thc is was all good ..... ;)
Great Post! Me too! :D Me too!
Tystick; You handled being called a stupid stoner pretty well if you ask me.:)
(i was offended also)
Is that possible? 55 % of the plant material is either THC or CBD???
in case y'all are wondering...percentages of THC/CBD represent the total amount compared to other cannabinoids/terpenes/terpenoids/flavinoids in the plant. So 55% CBD = 55% of what is in a trichome is CBD, not 55% of what is in the plant.
yeah my guess is that most likely it would be a concentrate type product if the total #'s are over 30%thanks good info as i was sure that was on the sheet 18 thc 37 cbd as a matter of fact let me check if i can find it. Again not sure if they were exaggerating but would be bad for business been they were a disp and handing out sheet to 300k people.
I'm sure you could grab some and have it tested but i also read today someone post that different lab's will give you dif reading so really don't know tbh
in case y'all are wondering...percentages of THC/CBD represent the total amount compared to other cannabinoids/terpenes/terpenoids/flavinoids in the plant. So 55% CBD = 55% of what is in a trichome is CBD, not 55% of what is in the plant.
Thats your opinion, and not a fact...right?
I think your wrong there.
just sayin;)
TT- First of all, I didn't call you a "stupid stoner". If that's what you took from it, that's you're problem to work through. I did say you were paranoid for believing your joke of an argument. To me, it's obvious that calling your argument "a joke" has offended you. I think its funny that you think it's ok to bash my argument, but when I bash yours, you get all defensive, and then mix and match my words so you can try and offend me personally.....talk about immature.
typically cbd to thc ratios are stated in a 1:2, 1.5:2, 3:1, etc
typically when you see thc(a) or cbd(a) stated in a %, it is a percent of the mass of the sample, ie 1/10 g bud or oil desolved into (in my case) 40 ml methanol to bring the sample to the same dilution as the cannabinoid standand (restek #34014..1000ug/ml) so that the chromatograph can determine the amount of cannabinoid in the test sample
in my case, the test sample that is injected in to the gc is 1ul, that is 1 millionth of a liter, so i normally will run five tests,toss the high and the low and average the 3 middle results
re different labs getting different results.. sloppiness,differences in moisture content,trichomes lost,etc
thc(a) decarboxylates into thc when you smoke it but not at 100% so tests always show a higher percent of thc(a) than the actual thc you consume
hplc results typically show thc(a)
gc normally use a flame ionization detector which will decarboxylate the thc(a) into thc and the results are always a lower percentage number for a sample of the same material
bubble hash will test at 30%-60% normally depending on quality
with all that said
imo, those numbers were an attempt to defraud the consumer
fwiw
So, what's wrong with wanting to get high? I don't have a lot of patience for hypocrisy, and yes, most people are going to get high. I HAVE multiple legitimate medical needs for it- and I freely 'admit' that I like to smoke it to get high.
Let's not suddenly find a 'high horse' to get on when discussing what consenting adults might like to do in the privacy of their own homes.
Different folks have different needs. THC is absolutely medically valuable, anyone trying to argue against this doesnt have the facts.
Some people dont want to get high, say "it doesnt do anything for them" when they arent even willing to push themselves past the threshold of "getting a little stoned". Then they crush up and snort some oxys and deny the high they have while nodding out.
If you fast for a week and then eat an apple its going to make you feel pretty fuckin good.
CBD rich strains are certainly psychoactive, just in a different way. If the strain has any terpinoid content whatsoever it is going to get you high, thc is not the only factor.
I just smoke some "dirt weed" from south dakota and I got hella ripped. "No THC" they said. "Just remnants from the hemp days" they said, "it will just give you a headache". All bullshit and lies. Pulled it from the ditch myself and it was great. Cant wait to pop those beans.
this statement is 100% inaccurate they made oxy's crush / snort proof 3 yrs ago its roxy's they crush now.....lol.. i agree with the rest thought .....
I love all of your guy's comments.....I don't know how it turned in to the convo it did...but it's cool I enjoyed it. I was just looking for some High CBD Strains so I provide to my patients. If any one know where I can order high CBD strains and not CBD crew because I have those now. I am looking for something a little higher in CBD around 12% - 15% or even higher with a low percentage of THC.. I have Harlequin which is 24% THC and 9%CBD. the THC is still to high for some people's liking.
Money rules this world and makes all the decisions.....bottom line. I watch CSP 1 and 2......yes it's boring as shit but the things I learn about how our gov operates......or more realistically, how big business operates through our gov. with the power to influence our gov through various vices it has. In other words, our gov is a drug addict and it's drug of choice is- supporting the gov's interests by writing large checks, even when the money is for interests the organization writing the check opposes. I think moral code plays a small % in the argument, but money is everything these days.
LOL- he protests like someone who knows too much!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?