It's sad that that when you don't agree with someone's very unscientific opinion, others see it as "arguing". I simply do not think that the one idea about what is happening here is logical, or based on any actual science. As such I would simply like other opinions,....possibly from those that have experienced the same thing that I have experienced, in my climate, and resolved it. The fact that I am not willing to stop searching for answers just because I was given one very unscientific option to try, that does not mean that I am "arguing".
I repeatedly heard the one opinion about the veg light cycle. Unless some biological reasoning can be applied to that theory, I'd like to hear other thoughts from other growers. I will still try altering the indoor cycle next season, as suggested. But, I have no confidence that this will resolve my problem. So, now I would now like to move on to some other possibilities. It's not arguing, I just don't have confidence in that one idea. Frankly, after researching, that idea seems to have very little biological fact to support it.
As far as your other comments, I would ask you to reconsider one thing you've said. You said:
Why would this apply to a plant moved under the sun, but it wouldn't apply to artificial lighting? I can assure you that your above claim is totally inaccurate if applied to artificially controlled light. Indoors you can go from 24 hours down to 16 hours of light,.....18 hours of light down to 15 hours of light,...20 hours of light down to 16 hours of light,.....so on and so on,.......all without issue. As long as you don't hit that genetically predetermined darkness period indoors (generally 10 to 12 hours of darkness), the plant won't flower without there being other abnormal circumstances (generally some kind of extreme plant stress).
But, you are claiming this can't be done when moving an indoor plant outside? Somehow the photoperiod principles totally change when you mix artificial light with natural sunlight?!?!?!
You seem like an intelligent guy,...so, surely you can understand why this might not make sense, and why I would want to explore this with more biological reasoning.
No offense,....but I've heard that one very unscientific opinion repeatedly. Now I would like to explore other ideas,.....ideally from people that have first hand experience with this exact problem. It's not that I am arguing. I just think there is more to it than that.