
Rama777
Supporter
- 1,570
- 263
I put 8 kish/Chem plants under Metal Halide and 7 under LED about 8 weeks ago.
Ppfd was somewhat lower under metal halide to keep temps in both tents the same with lights on. Leaf surface temps were very similar, lights on. VPD was usually quite excessive under metal halide and pretty consistently optimal under LED (according to what seems to be the consensus amongst VPD proponents). Plants under metal halide were excessively cool during lights off for the first 4-5 weeks. Fluctuations were much less in the LED tent.
Essentially, conditions were more conventionally optimal under LED and ppfd levels were higher under LED as well. Pot size, soil were the same in each tent.
Results? Metal Halide seems obviously superior, at least in veg. Better color, 25-50% more growth. Oddly, I’ve had more mag deficiency under MH than LED but with less ppfd. I’ve discovered that for certain reasons I think I’ve been undershooting my cal mag (RO water here..) so some deficiency in both tents is expected. I estimate that it was more so under metal halide since they were just growing faster and using Nitrogen more quickly as a result?
Is that just the way she goes? Or can anything be tweaked under LED to match the growth rate of metal halide?
Aside from obviously the different light, and the colder nights under Metal Halide (which you’d think would be a hindrance..), the biggest difference was that the humidity was much lower under MH..
Ppfd was somewhat lower under metal halide to keep temps in both tents the same with lights on. Leaf surface temps were very similar, lights on. VPD was usually quite excessive under metal halide and pretty consistently optimal under LED (according to what seems to be the consensus amongst VPD proponents). Plants under metal halide were excessively cool during lights off for the first 4-5 weeks. Fluctuations were much less in the LED tent.
Essentially, conditions were more conventionally optimal under LED and ppfd levels were higher under LED as well. Pot size, soil were the same in each tent.
Results? Metal Halide seems obviously superior, at least in veg. Better color, 25-50% more growth. Oddly, I’ve had more mag deficiency under MH than LED but with less ppfd. I’ve discovered that for certain reasons I think I’ve been undershooting my cal mag (RO water here..) so some deficiency in both tents is expected. I estimate that it was more so under metal halide since they were just growing faster and using Nitrogen more quickly as a result?
Is that just the way she goes? Or can anything be tweaked under LED to match the growth rate of metal halide?
Aside from obviously the different light, and the colder nights under Metal Halide (which you’d think would be a hindrance..), the biggest difference was that the humidity was much lower under MH..
Last edited: