Dude I don't know how old you are but they were worried long before that. Remember this one?People have been worried since Timothy Leary won.
Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 (1969), is a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with the constitutionality of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Timothy Leary, a professor and activist, was arrested for the possession of marijuana in violation of the Marihuana Tax Act.
I'm old so it is my responsibility to present my experiences in this life as is any elder of the tribe.
The thing was you had to have a tax stamp to grow cannabis but to get that tax stamp you had to bring is said cannabis and when you did bring it is without a tax stamp you were guilty of a crime.
This is our original Martor : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_R._Caldwell
View attachment 2573758
That is a valid construct:Dude I don't know how old you are but they were worried long before that. Remember this one?
Reefer Madness (1936)
A trio of drug dealers lead innocent teenagers to become addicted to "reefer" cigarettes by holding wild parties with jazz music.tubitv.com
It's not news that money is involved. Laws against cannabis and other drugs make trafficking them more lucrative. I'm sure politicians love untraceable money from black markets. I suspect the current administration looks longingly at that money. I also suspect Mitch McConnell wants to regain revenue from lost liquor sales due to the tariffs.Well, what is and has been true?
What does even Rand Paul not get onboard with?
That's right Cannabis Freedom for Mom and Pop.
It seems to me that the whole WTF is about how to divide up the commercial aspect while keeping the people in cannabis-chains.
It's valuable in stores because most people can't or won't grow it.You know.. How is it to be valuable in a store if any one can grow it.
I always thought ‘kids these days will never know…’ but I guess they might!Same way we used to.
My understanding is its only illegal if the flower is above 34-35% THC.You hit the nail on the head there. I just read an article ( I'll try to find it and post a link) that said even though the law does mention seeds that will produce plants that are over .3% thc there is no way to tell unless you grow out the seed. The seed itself has no thc and there is no genetic test to tell what it will produce so the law will be unenforceable and the wording will probably be changed before the law is implemented. As far as I'm concerned there is nothing to worry about except seed company's trying to make a profit from the panic
Trillions..!! To be exact. To be real about it... they've been stealing from us for way longer than most could fathom.2019 was a great year for the Governments stealing money.
That was the first year that property forfeit actions without filing criminal actions surpassed all theft from bank and retail robbery and theft.
Let that sink in. The government took more money from the population than criminals did.
Sup capIt ain’t law yet.
Man, that’s some bs tho.
Well yaaargh mateys.
Yaaaaargh.
Since this is a thread about government incompetence and corruption I have thought about what the biggest mistake in the foundation of our country.
We have a bill of rights that has no teeth.
A violation of the bill of rights is almost always a government or is done at government directions.
Now when you make a law that can end in sanctions for the guilty party the law stipulates incarceration and monetary penalties.
For " some " reason they thought the legislature was going to fix this.
Big mistake.
The bill of rights should have been written spelling out the penalties for violation of the amendment.
To allow the very people who are going to violate these rights to set sanctions is the most idiotic thing our founders ever did.
It should have been thus
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The penalty for a government official violating the rights of the people shall be removal of office holder and imprisonment for not less than 10 years and complete restitution of all payments made to the office holder.
Or some such.
I prefer a more harsh penalty.
I have always loved the term hung by the neck until dead.
Morning Capt. Hope all is well in the bunker.It ain’t law yet.
Man, that’s some bs tho.
Well yaaargh mateys.
Yaaaaargh.
Ok twitter files are now exhibit 1View attachment 2573973
We learned in 2022 from the Twitter Files the government was partnering with social media companies to restrict our 1st Amendment rights and I'm still waiting for arrests and trials that will never come and also prefer the term, hung by the fking neck until DEAD!
Just read this from Marijuana Moment and came here to share:
It's 'Unclear' How Feds Will Enforce Hemp THC Product Ban, Congressional Researchers Say, Citing Limited FDA And DEA Resources - Marijuana Moment
Congressional researchers say it “remains unclear” how the federal government might enforce a newly enacted law that takes effect next year banning hemp THC products—flagging concerns about a potential lack of resources on the part of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Drug Enforcement...www.marijuanamoment.net
I just came across the video again. Everyone needs to listen to this:What's sad about it as @JIMKSI64 said, a lot of us in those retirement years aren't using it just to be a pothead. We do have a reason. BTW brother my Feminized Auto Maverick CBD seeds came in so my next reversal plan is those. Those will not be part of the ban
He ain't wrong. Money and power absolutely corrupts any system.I just came across the video again. Everyone needs to listen to this:
I watched it. Again it seems like hearsay. The lawyer guy Florida Mike posted didn’t mention that, but then again he’s a lawyer for corporations looking to profit. I would like to see the actual bill and read it to make my own interpretation.I just came across the video again. Everyone needs to listen to this:
Dude, if you voted for the retarded party that thinks men can get pregnant then you might wanna STFUIt's a pleasure to read everyone!
Trump has pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras,
He was convicted of importing TONS of Cocaine into the USA.
We all need to see that Trump administration is killing the little people in boats and freeing the Bosses.
In my opinion Trump is attempting to get into the drug trade down in South America and not actually stop drugs.
Why else would he free a guy that can help him become a Narco-President?
I mean the guy owes Trump bigly!
So the War on Drugs is not only back but the administration looks to be muscling their way into all that money.
We all know drugs will stop when Americans don't want them but until then drugs are an industry like all other industries.
And now are we seeing our President inserting himself in the flow of drug-money?
Let us fight to free Mom and Pop growers in our States.
The same party that says they are going to legalize every election cycle and never makes any attempt? Those guys? Unfortunately because of citizens united, corporations are people, both sides are bought and paid for by the same corporations.Dude, if you voted for the retarded party that thinks men can get pregnant then you might wanna STFU
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?