I was pointing out the hypocrisy of popular opinion, not scientific precision.
My opinion about GM food really boils down to this; these plants, animals, microbes and fungi have been evolving in this environment, dealing with one another and these pests for millions of years. We have a long ways to go to even understand how they do it, let alone start fucking with the programming.
On the level of possibly creating an invasive species that is predisposed to disease and possibly setting ourselves up for future famine and stuff of that I am quite alarmed--for the reasons you cite here.
In terms of giving humans cancer and shit like that because we spliced some genes in--with exception to the pesticide producing strains--it's a bunch of hogwash. We
do actually understand how the organisms work well enough to understand whether or not we should eat them.
I think that's the big disconnect here honestly. People think we're blind here when in fact we understand these organisms and how to manipulate them implicitly in many ways.
As far as their adaptability and stuff like that, absolutely 100% we're behind the eight ball with these organisms. Who knows how they will evolve into the future.
As far as eating an apple which has been modified to grow bigger--suggesting its unsafe only demonstrates how little
the individual saying as much knows about the science not how little
we as a species know.
Excluding pesticide producing crops, I'd feed exclusively GMO produce to my nieces and nephews without losing a wink of sleep or batting a waking eye. I think antibiotics and hormones in feed and shit like that is
a WAY bigger problem, or pesticides in the water supply for instance (Did you know pesticides are even showing up in rainwater now? This is not good.).
This doesn't mean organic isn't better. It is. It just means most GMO crops aren't going to cause people to grow a third arm from their forehead.