Salutations Glassdub,
That's close to
204 °C and i remember in my thermostatic days that this was my upper limit to never pass, but i forgot the exact expression describing why it was becoming detrimental over this temperature. Flirts with combustion arrived much later after my initiation, once i got the means (based on clean-burning butane).
Tell me, i was banned on GrassCity right after reminding a visitor that Arizer always kept it a constant criteria in their designs to depend on the user's inhalation (e.g. implying the lungs path) to also promote electronics ventilation - since at least 2008, which was the very 1st trace of related concerns to ever come to my attention. So, has Arizer finally included separate paths containment in any new products lately? ... Just asking. Or maybe they didn't like it if i happened to write "robo fart"?... It's been a while since my last attempt to follow that trend i shall confess!!
As i vaguely recall i think the "high temperatures" range is desirable if one is after THCa, THCv or perhaps it's both. You tell me! The CBD noble molecules of "therapeutic" cannabis is another case residing near the opposite boundary of aroma/taste, in part by fault of ovenizer "baking" i might add. Pre-Heating is fine and probably even necessary but lets not forget the OP mentioned "vaping off the bat", so it sounds reasonable to assume he's actually running on e-Liquid(s) dipping in some resistive/coiled heater element powered through an electronic (PWM) rheostat inside a closed-circuit control loop translating as further delays, the slow-steady fashion type i think... As a consequence an accumulation of "baking" effect is to be expected and experience confirms this logical intuition, using Pulse Heating.
With my cust. VG pipe the range of operation starts with clean-butane burning from a single torch flame and goes up to butane lighters with 3. Stronger flame throttle means more energy, hence i've been forced to observe that triple-flame torching works best though this necessarily involves a time-compressed scenario where all temperature slopes coïncide into a brief event, while it's hesitation from longer periods that typically caused combustion accidents, from hesitation interfering with manual mode. Those pocket lighters have relatively tiny fuel tanks and i must testify that my 1 flame unit routinely reminds me about the importance of ENERGY - proportional to throttle.
Ideally it's energy carried by a (convective) "Release/Transport Agent" which causes transformations in the bowl, like to raise temperature until opacity from "cloud" generation feels satisfactory. But the OP's tool appears to suggest an e-Liquid tank instead...
So, in e-Cigs we deal with conduction heating that comes with, guess what, the accumulated effects of "baking" of course. Temperature in a whole liguid mass has to raise until "Transport" can even occur, and this sounds just as unappealing to me as to cook one ~300 mg simply to gain the privilege of an aroma/taste experience lasting only a couple puffs...
How's temperature in e-liquids measured anyway? Ain't the settings more about an extrapolation of the possible yet-to-come toke?... Almost like stove controls in my kitchen.
To be honest if it's got to be electric then i wish i could name a square device with optical scanning of the cannabic path in its control loop.
Got to go! Dinner on its way...
Good day, have fun!!