THCFarmer.com
121,275 Members Log In Register
Log In Register

What are you Watching Now?

  • Thread starter Thread starter e4ian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What are you Watching Now?

e4ian 549 Replies 39,098 Views
Page 21 of 28 · Replies 401–420 of 550
#402
jumpincactus said:
@Psychonaut47 if this stuff interests you check out this link.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-co...anto-the-worlds-most-evil-corporation/5387964

and then this one.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/a-cons...-and-americas-growing-heroin-epidemic/5533673
Click to expand...
It does enterest me @jumpincactus. I think what interest me the most is our/human instincts, mostly the instinct of preservation. It is what I think is the strongest instinct, I'm just not quite sure if the instinct to preserve our soul is as strong today. On the one hand I want to say it is interchangeable you know the body and the spirit but I hesitate because much of the body's instincts are involuntary and it appears as though we as humans have voluntarily allowed the conditioning of our spirits.....take for instance the food we eat in the usa, if I'm not mistaken we produce and consume 90%+ of the world's GMO's, including myself I'm not exempt or superior....and what I'm saying is that they broke our spirit's first then our bodies and I imagine that at first it appeared that our spirit's were strong. And I'm not making excuses either, hell I don't even think understanding this mess IS enough to make a change but I know that they/people who imposed this cultural genocide want us to believe we our conquered and that we must surrender our body's and spirits, and for the most part we have. But we're not conquered yet.

I wonder what I would have said when the conquistadors reached these lands ages ago. Would I have offered to feed them, clothe them, shelter them? I like to think my spirit would have offered first and upon refusal my body would have followed. The history books want us/a to believe that we thought they/conqs were GAWDS who mastered horses and wooden whales and that is why we worshipped them, I'm calling bullshit though. We didn't worship the soon to be so called conquers, we loved ourselves and our spirits, we treated them as ourselves so in fact we were nourishing ourselves in nourishing them but they refused to accept that knowledge, they wouldn't even let us feed them after acknowledging our power, they do not want our corn let alone want to learn TO GROW THEIR OWN...but as conquers do, they "they learned to grow their own, right, and they learned to grow it bigger and better right." But they won't eat it themselves but force us to eat it jajajajaja...I'll just shut up before the realize there's more minds to mine jajajajaja

In light of the spirit of John Trudell I say,"if we are conquered then why are they still mining us, if we are conquered then why are they still climbing". Conquered is obviously past tense and they want us to believe that the battle is over which it is not. In other words, they are still trying to conquer us to this day and they have not, obviously.
They want to be called conquistadors but haven't conquered shit because they are trying to conquer themselves And can't because we belong to our creator. Our body is temporary and will expire back into the earth and our spirit will move on to the next substrate.
 
#404
Psychonaut47 said:
It does enterest me @jumpincactus. I think what interest me the most is our/human instincts, mostly the instinct of preservation. It is what I think is the strongest instinct, I'm just not quite sure if the instinct to preserve our soul is as strong today. On the one hand I want to say it is interchangeable you know the body and the spirit but I hesitate because much of the body's instincts are involuntary and it appears as though we as humans have voluntarily allowed the conditioning of our spirits.....take for instance the food we eat in the usa, if I'm not mistaken we produce and consume 90%+ of the world's GMO's, including myself I'm not exempt or superior....and what I'm saying is that they broke our spirit's first then our bodies and I imagine that at first it appeared that our spirit's were strong. And I'm not making excuses either, hell I don't even think understanding this mess IS enough to make a change but I know that they/people who imposed this cultural genocide want us to believe we our conquered and that we must surrender our body's and spirits, and for the most part we have. But we're not conquered yet.

I wonder what I would have said when the conquistadors reached these lands ages ago. Would I have offered to feed them, clothe them, shelter them? I like to think my spirit would have offered first and upon refusal my body would have followed. The history books want us/a to believe that we thought they/conqs were GAWDS who mastered horses and wooden whales and that is why we worshipped them, I'm calling bullshit though. We didn't worship the soon to be so called conquers, we loved ourselves and our spirits, we treated them as ourselves so in fact we were nourishing ourselves in nourishing them but they refused to accept that knowledge, they wouldn't even let us feed them after acknowledging our power, they do not want our corn let alone want to learn TO GROW THEIR OWN...but as conquers do, they "they learned to grow their own, right, and they learned to grow it bigger and better right." But they won't eat it themselves but force us to eat it jajajajaja...I'll just shut up before the realize there's more minds to mine jajajajaja

In light of the spirit of John Trudell I say,"if we are conquered then why are they still mining us, if we are conquered then why are they still climbing". Conquered is obviously past tense and they want us to believe that the battle is over which it is not. In other words, they are still trying to conquer us to this day and they have not, obviously.
They want to be called conquistadors but haven't conquered shit because they are trying to conquer themselves And can't because we belong to our creator. Our body is temporary and will expire back into the earth and our spirit will move on to the next substrate.
Click to expand...
They, you can call em monsanto/dupont/rockefellers/Rothschild s/illuminated masons/ conquers or whatever explicit, want us to kill our own spirit so they can mine our bodies and minds because they are soulless and believe that wealth and illussion of power is an accomplishment....but what it looks like to me is that they have abandoned their own spirit and are desperately trying to retrieve it without changing their ways.
 
#412
GrowGod said:
Then I see a preview to point break remake and all I can do is shake my head. Why try to one up a great movie? With a bunch of cheese ball upgrades and horrible acting? Patrick swayze cannot be one upped in a movie like point break. No matter how hard they try and they didn't try at all
Click to expand...

Just watched this. They used the same name scam format the cats from Humboldt use to make seeds from clones with. same fire and ice format to. washes off the names to use the fire and ice format. doesn't matter what gets said or what you do if another person can apply that format and you cant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_and_Ice_(1983_film).

alot of good shit in this movie. " 8 different trials against the forces of nature." add 1 thing to each of the 4 things it makes 8.
13738353_465290260308190_193467363123790244_o.jpg

pretty sure this is what the fight i get into is over mostly. they hate if you cut in line but if your the person that has to say something to start the line to begin with its not cutting.
13775827_465304350306781_6037439238496922324_n.jpg


"do you have any idea how many people you've killed? How many laws you've broken? You accomplished nothing " " maybe but im not done yet"
13710535_465310663639483_6086542303806715093_o.jpg

the text they display on google doesn't match the audio in the movie. same shit berner does.

when the guy says nothing it means the other guy succeeded at living a normal life. when it gets edited by a 3rd party to make it seem like the other guy said "The only law that matters is gravity." it ruins the part where the guy said nothing which outranks the gravity bullshit. i understand why that is popular but 'nothing' wins over gravity because if you have to think a word before you react to something then you lose to the person who does not have to think before they react. just like in the start of the movie and at the end of the movie where the best friends die. both guys die because of that reason which is why it probably got edited out of the text version. First point break didn't have any of that in it.

death scenes are better then the first one. kinda dilutes the movie to re use the point break name but at the same time its more ethical and morally acceptable then deleting the name of what you copied to achieve something. weird to see it flip from poor people in the first movie to rich people in this one.

"i think i know what im after" " you dont know shit."
 
#414
grayarea said:
both guys die because of that reason which is why it probably got edited out of the text version. First point break didn't have any of that in it.

death scenes are better then the first one. kinda dilutes the movie to re use the point break name but at the same time its more ethical and morally acceptable then deleting the name of what you copied to achieve something. weird to see it flip from poor people in the first movie to rich people in this one.

"i think i know what im after" " you dont know shit."
Click to expand...
Your the best I've ever seen at breaking these situations down. Most people watch a movie and are so into the ohh's and ahhh's aka the gmo's that they miss most if not all of the actual content. It's like 2 dimensional thinking compared to 3. No contest.
So in the second one it sounds as if they upped the"gmo's" and down played the reality pieces that drew me into the first one. I will check it out.
It's funny you responded to this today because I watched another 90's infiltrating sky diving movie last night Drop zone with Wesley snipes.:) Not as good as the first point break but solid none the less.And how the hell did Gary Busey get to play the bad guy and good guy in two infiltrating robbing adrenaline movies? Some how some way he pulled it off and neither would be the same without him.
"Get me 2 meatball sandwiches"
 
#415
GrowGod said:
Your the best I've ever seen at breaking these situations down. Most people watch a movie and are so into the ohh's and ahhh's aka the gmo's that they miss most if not all of the actual content. It's like 2 dimensional thinking compared to 3. No contest.
So in the second one it sounds as if they upped the"gmo's" and down played the reality pieces that drew me into the first one. I will check it out.
It's funny you responded to this today because I watched another 90's infiltrating sky diving movie last night Drop zone with Wesley snipes.:) Not as good as the first point break but solid none the less.And how the hell did Gary Busey get to play the bad guy and good guy in two infiltrating robbing adrenaline movies? Some how some way he pulled it off and neither would be the same without him.
"Get me 2 meatball sandwiches"
Click to expand...
I prefer 'always bet on black' mostly because it's the only wesleysnipes quote I can ever remember, and I know it's not the same movie. Snipes must be a federal air marshall.

growgod do you mind if I use you as a translator in these threads? I keep getting migraines trying to understand this stuff.
 
#417
grayarea said:
"During the peak of L.A.'s bank-robbery era in 1992, as many as 28 banks were robbed in a single day"
Click to expand...
That's what I'm talking about. It's like have a motive something to win even if your chances are small. Today people kill people for no reason. LoL what the fuck happen? And I get security is super tight and your probally not going to get away with it but it's like playing the lottery but for keeps.
Then we had Heat! The prime of R. Denaro! You can't beat that. Our of a hundred times you still don't beat him even once.
 
#418
LocalGrowGuy said:
I prefer 'always bet on black' mostly because it's the only wesleysnipes quote I can ever remember, and I know it's not the same movie. Snipes must be a federal air marshall.

growgod do you mind if I use you as a translator in these threads? I keep getting migraines trying to understand this stuff.
Click to expand...
LocalGrowGuy said:
I prefer 'always bet on black' mostly because it's the only wesleysnipes quote I can ever remember, and I know it's not the same movie. Snipes must be a federal air marshall.

growgod do you mind if I use you as a translator in these threads? I keep getting migraines trying to understand this stuff.
Click to expand...
Try thinking in 1st person and third person at the same time when you read through with no what ifs because they do not work that way.
I will do my best to help you.
 
#419
GrowGod said:
Your the best I've ever seen at breaking these situations down. Most people watch a movie and are so into the ohh's and ahhh's aka the gmo's that they miss most if not all of the actual content. It's like 2 dimensional thinking compared to 3. No contest.
So in the second one it sounds as if they upped the"gmo's" and down played the reality pieces that drew me into the first one. I will check it out.
It's funny you responded to this today because I watched another 90's infiltrating sky diving movie last night Drop zone with Wesley snipes.:) Not as good as the first point break but solid none the less.And how the hell did Gary Busey get to play the bad guy and good guy in two infiltrating robbing adrenaline movies? Some how some way he pulled it off and neither would be the same without him.
"Get me 2 meatball sandwiches"
Click to expand...

big difference in making people act around a personality type and picking them by personality types then letting them talk like they did with swasey and busey. gives them clout over 'actors'.
 
#420
grayarea said:
big difference in making people act around a personality type and picking them by personality types then letting them talk like they did with swasey and busey. gives them clout over 'actors'.
Click to expand...
Exactly why I don't watch many movies anymore. It's too pretend for me. Like smoking pretendies back in the 2000's. Leaves a bad taste in my mouth. There's always room for the guy that's "acting" but you have to have the characters that live the part too. It's like everyone thought K. Reeves was a bad ass in point break, oh he's so great but in reality you didn't notice his "acting" because swasey and Busey were really that good! I feel reeves could have been replaced in point break and you wouldn't lose any feel. Same with all his other movies including the matrix. That dumb founded look he gets in every moving really annoys the shot out of me.
 
Page 21 of 28 · Replies 401–420 of 550
Back
Top Bottom