I actually learned a lot looking into all this too:) I won't lie I'm kind of a nerd,I love this shit haha.
Those finishing solistek 10k lamps are killer. Ive finished last two weeks with one on my orange cookie that normally takes 10-11 weeks and it looked done at 9 weeks. More purple, more frosty, more greasy to boot only drawback is it burned out on me after about 3 months worth of use( I tried using it for veg). I've tried a 20k coral mh too with good results but I think it's almost too much UV it fries leaves if you're not careful. Those hort blues you have make great finishing bulbs too churning out some decent UV and they have an even higher CRI than cmh at 95. Only trouble is they're so expensive and Hortilux says to change em out at 6 months! Yet another big advantage to the cmh much much longer bulb life.
The cmh bulbs are easier to cool than HPS because there's a lower percentage of infrared light in the spectrum, which is also why they're more efficient. Infrared is useful for plant processes but the balance of infrared to other usable wavelengths is way off what plants evolved to use. So your plants will actually use a higher percentage of the energy you're throwing at them rather than a good portion of that energy simply heating your room as with HPS. All the light energy your plant doesn't use regardless of spectrum will ultimately get converted into heat. That's why the spectrum balance is so important for efficiency because you want it to use everything you throw at it.....
Found this
http://images.philips.com/is/conten..._AA-Philips_LED_Toplighting_2015Nov_FINAL.pdf.
on Philips site it compares their LEDs to DE HPS scroll down it shows the energy output breakdown. Interesting to note the TOTAL heat per watt isn't too much more with HPS. I'm trying to find one comparing Cmh to HPS....
I bet that low iron glass is expensive.....