MIMedGrower
- Posts
- 17,190
- Reactions
- 53,530
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Points
- 438
Yes but the fluence will have a much bigger footprint.
That is true. I believe that the test had par numbers in a second unseen to me vid. They were accounting for that.
It was focusing on eficiency and they were equating it to gpw i believe.
I saw it a while ago.