hyzerflip
- 322
- 63
Awesome, thanks! This is exactly what I was looking for.
So even after supplementing with UV, NIR and far red he's still getting larfier flowers with less smell?
Are Quantums comparable to the newer Gavita 1650Es?
So even after supplementing with UV, NIR and far red he's still getting larfier flowers with less smell?
Are Quantums comparable to the newer Gavita 1650Es?
I've ran 1000w hortilux hps for over 10yrs now.
VS.
My friend runs all quantum boards.
He grows all my keeper collection. And our watts per square are nearly the same.
HPS pros:
Much denser flower.
Higher calyx to leaf ratio.
Much more trich and terps.
Lights mounted high, no raising or lowering.
Headroom
Quantum pros:
Much higher yield
HPS cons:
Slightly higher temps produced w4w (but I use ducted hoods to handle that)
Quantum cons:
Always need height adj.
Require supplemental UV, NIR and far red.
Leafier and fluffier flower
Less complex terpene production
I'm actually on this topic looking for what he is doing wrong.
He supps UV, NIR, far red, and co2.
I don't supp any of those.