Hi there, new, showing off my plant

[btilly]

No... You harassed people and have an attitude issue why you felt you were attacked but the reality is you couldn't accept my or any of the multiple conclude about your plant that you burnt and stressed it and this isn't good.

Barely anyone wants to hold a conversation with you either just hoping this will die and you'll go bother some other people on some other board or discipline.

And still you after all this time and ranting have no proof and cannot validate your outrageous claims.the fact I even bother replying is so you have the chance to either apologise or show real proof not long rants that you have something you described as industry shattering!

We're all still waiting no one cares about anything but this proof you've so far avoided which seems only so you can rant more!

@TestTime described you as being like him in that you're both assholes. I'll be politer and say that you're both aggressively confrontational.

That doesn't bother me. I'm from tech. Tech is filled with people on variations of the spectrum. Aggressively confrontational is something you learn to deal with. And a key part of dealing with it, is learning to tell who is likely right.

The absolute number one thing that I've learned about people who tend to be right, is how readily they admit to being wrong. Or out of their depth. They know very well what their expertise is, and do not overstate it.

Frequently people like this are blunt with the truth. That's because the energy spent sugarcoating the truth, gets in the way of figuring out what really is true. Such people can be very hard to work with. But they are so invaluable that it is absolutely worth the effort to figure out how to do this.

I've known @TestTime for decades. I consider him the epitome of that stereotype. He demonstrated it in this thread. He's clearly stated what his expertise is and isn't. When concerns were raised about mold, he realized that he hadn't thought enough about the problem. He took it seriously. When people didn't believe that he could produce much product, he showed pictures.

What about you, by contrast? Here is what I see.

1. You claimed that @TestTime was foxtailing, and therefore his production had to be terrible. You were shown pictures and given descriptions of how much product he has. You didn't admit to being wrong.
2. You claimed that what @TestTime was doing couldn't work, because thermodynamics. @Nyarlathotep addressed your concerns starting at here. You were absolutely wrong, were shown to be wrong, and failed to admit it.
3. You said that he was lying about his background. I showed up to say that he wasn't lying about his background. I made myself verifiable, and put a reputation that I've created over decades on multiple programming sites on the line. What do we hear from you? Crickets.

The pattern is clear. Over and over again you are wrong, are shown to be wrong, and fail to acknowledge your mistakes. You then continue on claiming to be right and knowledgeable. In tech we have stereotypes about this kind of aggressively confrontational person. The usual advice is get them as far from a position to do damage, as fast as possible. Preferably get them fired.

And now here you are saying that the product must be terrible. A product that you have never experienced yourself. An opinion that can only be true if @TestTime is lying about what it does for him.

As I said before, and put my reputation behind, @TestTime is many things. Not all good. But dishonest isn't one of them.

My conclusion? You are wrong again. Just like you were many times before. But from my experience of people like you, I don't expect you to acknowledge that. So you'll continue as you are.

 

[KG1]

@TestTime described you as being like him in that you're both assholes. I'll be politer and say that you're both aggressively confrontational.

That doesn't bother me. I'm from tech. Tech is filled with people on variations of the spectrum. Aggressively confrontational is something you learn to deal with. And a key part of dealing with it, is learning to tell who is likely right.

The absolute number one thing that I've learned about people who tend to be right, is how readily they admit to being wrong. Or out of their depth. They know very well what their expertise is, and do not overstate it.

Frequently people like this are blunt with the truth. That's because the energy spent sugarcoating the truth, gets in the way of figuring out what really is true. Such people can be very hard to work with. But they are so invaluable that it is absolutely worth the effort to figure out how to do this.

I've known @TestTime for decades. I consider him the epitome of that stereotype. He demonstrated it in this thread. He's clearly stated what his expertise is and isn't. When concerns were raised about mold, he realized that he hadn't thought enough about the problem. He took it seriously. When people didn't believe that he could produce much product, he showed pictures.

What about you, by contrast? Here is what I see.

1. You claimed that @TestTime was foxtailing, and therefore his production had to be terrible. You were shown pictures and given descriptions of how much product he has. You didn't admit to being wrong.
2. You claimed that what @TestTime was doing couldn't work, because thermodynamics. @Nyarlathotep addressed your concerns starting at here. You were absolutely wrong, were shown to be wrong, and failed to admit it.
3. You said that he was lying about his background. I showed up to say that he wasn't lying about his background. I made myself verifiable, and put a reputation that I've created over decades on multiple programming sites on the line. What do we hear from you? Crickets.

The pattern is clear. Over and over again you are wrong, are shown to be wrong, and fail to acknowledge your mistakes. You then continue on claiming to be right and knowledgeable. In tech we have stereotypes about this kind of aggressively confrontational person. The usual advice is get them as far from a position to do damage, as fast as possible. Preferably get them fired.

And now here you are saying that the product must be terrible. A product that you have never experienced yourself. An opinion that can only be true if @TestTime is lying about what it does for him.

As I said before, and put my reputation behind, @TestTime is many things. Not all good. But dishonest isn't one of them.

My conclusion? You are wrong again. Just like you were many times before. But from my experience of people like you, I don't expect you to acknowledge that. So you'll continue as you are.

No I'm not and this guy was a moron plain and simple.

We discuss things in quanta of micromole or meters per second biological maximus and what this guy was proposing was firstly well known about as it's simple to do and has already been done and secondly just against everything the research and growers have combined to call knowledgeable.

He went against people as he always does and you replying is just desperate.

The option was there to do or add something constructive but not one person really agrees putting plants in wind tunnels makes superior whatever and logically defies actual biology.

His half a year for a small amount of burnt crispy wispy leafy bud is just pathetic and if he had broken science then he wouldn't be posting here but in educated boards for peer review and novel prize.....

 

[btilly]

@KG1
Exactly as predicted. You failed to engage with any example of where you were clearly proven wrong. While continue to aggressively proclaim yourself to be right.

I will assume that any readers have the common sense to come to a reasonable conclusion about someone who so often has proven to be wrong. Even if you won't admit to your mistakes.

 

[TestTime]

No Frost here, nope. Nope. Nope.

It's all the wrong color. Especially it's obvious when the lights strip down. How bad that color is. It's terrible.

Let's see, yellow where the light hits it, whatever color you see where it's just right, then yellow again. I wonder if everybody's been bitching about the lights when there's a little document on this site that talks about how you can't trust the visual representation of the lights. Nah, no one reads that

Or I've got a magic plant and it's striped! Yeah that's it.

No active growth here, everything's dry. No weight at all.

Geez, it's withered away from the pictures from a week ago.

Okay, people, I'll grant you a few things.

The lights were wrong. The manipulation was wrong. The air was wrong. The temperature was wrong.

Anyone who told me I was wrong in any of those areas was absolutely right.

Thank you very much.

Foxtails? Anybody? Bueller?

No. Go ahead. Call this foxtails.

Smokability? You'll never know. I enjoy it.

Light lemony tasty green that falls off. First light has to do a bit of drying, but it starts off as a dry styrofoam texture. It breaks really easily but it still has a bit of firmness. As if it was about 80% dry when you're waiting for it to hang. But it is as dense as styrofoam.

The tiny bit of brown that falls off does taste dry. As if it's a bit of burnt chlorophyll. When the green falls off it doesn't taste like that at all. Now that I've managed to dial in the lights and everything else, almost no brown falls off.

This is the result of me working through about six branches in about an hour. I'm quite happy to chop it up in a bottle and scoop my pipe through it.

 

[TestTime]

Oh and yes I did the shelf. I gave that ramble before about having to do stuff. Here you go. I did stuff.


Check out the jack. I joined a couple hand clamps/ jacks together in a wooden base and now I can put anything in it. It will hold the
shelves or ceiling up while I'm working on it.

 

[KG1]

No one likes you here, your attitude has been the subject of hate all your life, thirty people said your plant is burnt ass crispy shit but here you are still talking down to the site.

You needed an attitude readjustment but like all narcissistic cunts just pushed those who tried to warn you until your nothing but hated and ignored by all.

Plant is a foxtailed joke and science proved it's super unhealthy to smoke burnt leaf or are you going to deny and cry over that too!

I'm the only one who responds because you need psychological help and think if you don't get it soon you'll simply become an even bigger cunt!

Now go away the site really doesn't want you here!

 

[TestTime]

No one likes you here, your attitude has been the subject of hate all your life, thirty people said your plant is burnt ass crispy shit but here you are still talking down to the site.

You needed an attitude readjustment but like all narcissistic cunts just pushed those who tried to warn you until your nothing but hated and ignored by all.

Plant is a foxtailed joke and science proved it's super unhealthy to smoke burnt leaf or are you going to deny and cry over that too!

I'm the only one who responds because you need psychological help and think if you don't get it soon you'll simply become an even bigger cunt!

Now go away the site really doesn't want you here!

It's wonderful how you speak for the community.

F off.

It's simple enough. I offered. And on re-read I realized. I was using km1 not kg1.

That's how insignificant you are. I didn't even bother remembering your three character name.

It's okay. Other people scrape shit off their shoes. I make monstrous plants with it.

Thank you for playing

 

[TestTime]

No one likes you here, your attitude has been the subject of hate all your life, thirty people said your plant is burnt ass crispy shit but here you are still talking down to the site.

You needed an attitude readjustment but like all narcissistic cunts just pushed those who tried to warn you until your nothing but hated and ignored by all.

Plant is a foxtailed joke and science proved it's super unhealthy to smoke burnt leaf or are you going to deny and cry over that too!

I'm the only one who responds because you need psychological help and think if you don't get it soon you'll simply become an even bigger cunt!

Now go away the site really doesn't want you here!

And I think that was the first significant go away from you.

Did you get tired of playing? Did your feelings get hurt? You want it stop and you want the bad person to go away.

Hehehehahahahaha

You have to have the last word. I could go away for a few days. I don't give a shit. And then I can pop back in. You on the other hand are hovering.

You need that last word. That's how I got you back every time. And you'll come back again.

Google hits are good. You trigger them.

Did he go away?

Maybe

But unlikely.

 

[KG1]

And I think that was the first significant go away from you.

Did you get tired of playing? Did your feelings get hurt? You want it stop and you want the bad person to go away.

Hehehehahahahaha

You have to have the last word. I could go away for a few days. I don't give a shit. And then I can pop back in. You on the other hand are hovering.

You need that last word. That's how I got you back every time. And you'll come back again.

Google hits are good. You trigger them.

Did he go away?

Maybe

But unlikely.

No I reply and am involved in other threads it just notifies me if new posts.

Not a game except the one your playing in your narcissistic head.

The community did speak, count many replies saying your crazy and your plants a burnt crispy monstrosity.

How is this so hard for you to understand!

 

[TestTime]

No I reply and am involved in other threads it just notifies me if new posts.

Not a game except the one your playing in your narcissistic head.

The community did speak, count many replies saying your crazy and your plants a burnt crispy monstrosity.

How is this so hard for you to understand!

They laughed at you. We all saw that.

 

[TestTime]

Okay, a heavy ruler that I took apart from a right angle. Sorry about the centimeters.

Hey, whoever likes to show their pictures of their terrible foxtails, go ahead and crush them for a bit with a heavy ruler and post them. I'd like a laugh. Oh, I laugh you no matter what, but it was a thought.

 

[KG1]

They laughed at you. We all saw that.

Must try better to fit in then unlike you!

 

[Stokes]

I have no idea what im looking at

 

[Stokes]

Is that a woodpecker rule?

 

[Stokes]

Im gonna go back and read the thread, looks like a good one

 

[KG1]

Im gonna go back and read the thread, looks like a good one

Five imaginary bucks says you skip large sections lol

 

[MileHiGhost]

First time I've had a reason to care about making level. Everything. This moment has been slapped together but I want this edge and the hinged shelf above it to be leveled.

So I grabbed a board and slapped it against this randomly constructed piece of crap and shoved my stomach against it and hot glued it in while eyeballing what I thought was level and put two screws on it. And what do you know, it's level.

The skinny long one is level, that's the one I'm talking about. The upper one I put together previously and it doesn't matter because I'm going to cut it off. I'll basically cut off anything sticking out too far from what I consider acceptable and I'll round out the cat shelf area.

Whoa that looks way to complicated

 

[Stokes]

I am genuinely happy he made it through the grow without that catching fire

 

[Magnumsmydog]

I think btilly and test are same person, just my 2 cents. Really dont care regardless, I believe ill keep doing things my way

 

[TestTime]

I think btilly and test are same person, just my 2 cents. Really dont care regardless, I believe ill keep doing things my way

That's cool. I wish I was as smart as him.

No. Damn it. I tried to hire him about 20 years ago and he laughed at me. He was doing financial district in Manhattan and I was pushing junk mail out in the sticks.

So instead I used him as my perl resource. And yes, that comment about not trusting me with his wife. Smart move. She was gorgeous.

If you do a little bit of googling you will see he is a perl God. I believe he was actually classified as a saint on the Perl monks website. He's the type of person who answered every goddamn question for years.

He taught me the A's versus bees versus C's and I quoted it early on in the thread when the asshole showed up. Then I pointed the conversation out to him so he decided to comment on it.

For anybody who's watching this thread, there's only a couple of you, and it's really awesome that I get to just interrupt whatever you're doing and then you'll pop in here and comment or be annoyed because you know that's what I'm expecting. Either way is good.

I can keep on popping these pictures for as long as this plant is alive. I wonder how long I can annoy you for?