I think it's pretty hilarious myself, you know--the way you're wrong.
Connecticuit:
The following document should make clear to you that what you said (no state can thank senators for MMJ laws) is flatly untrue. At the VERY LEAST, CT can thank their lawmakers for the ability to treat their illness as they see fit.
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Senate-OKs-medical-pot-bill-Malloy-to-sign-it-3535016.php
California:
Also read, california senate bill 420.
You know what, no--I'm not going to go through and look up every single state for you and prove to you that state legislature is part of the legal process in any state and as an absolute precondition has to play ball for an MMJ policies to see the light of day.
You can just pretend it isn't that way if you want to--but you'd be wrong.
I can't name the number of voter propositions which have been legislated into dust in this country, its in the thousands over our history.
I think I'll just stick to chemistry--at least then I can rightly call people idiots when they're being idiots.
All I have left to say is educate yourselves, its very obvious which side of the aisle has been pro-pot and which one has not. Your brain is asleep if you think otherwise--the republicans very openly deride the use of marijuana regardless of any medical utility it might have (which they absolutely deny the existence of).
Wait, hold on. Let's parse this out.
1. Something exists (legislative power to control state interests including MMJ policies).
2. You say that it doesn't, despite clear evidence.
Are you a republican? This would all make so much sense if you were--because they have this thing where they constantly say things don't exist that do, and that things do exist that don't.
It's this weird, sort of, being wrong all of the time thing that they do.