outwest
Premium Gardener
Supporter
- 4,629
- 263
Reagan must have been pro-pot, because there were no medical marijuana dispensary raids under his presidency. :confused:
outwest
outwest
I am sorry but what does this mean? That the more educated somebody is the more difficulty they have in admitting being wrong? What evidence do you have for this?All this just proves one thing squiggly...You are to educated to admit when you are wrong.
squigglyI am sorry but what does this mean? That the more educated somebody is the more difficulty they have in admitting being wrong? What evidence do you have for this?
You can thank the left for the existence of ANY legality WHATSOEVER in this country as it regards MJ.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats in any state can claim responsibility for the medical programs in those states- the voting public did that based on education and experience, not party lines or affiliations.
I am sorry homie but this is wrong. I am from Montana and until the 2010 elections that put the Tea Party radicals in our state legislation we had the most thriving and growing medical cannabis community out of any state. Now just like Ca and CO there surely were mistakes made on the side of those who desired to only profit off of the industry, that aside the Republicans ripped apart the voter approved initiative (which by the way was the most approved mmj initiative at that point) and we were left with a law that was all but a repeal of the mmj act. It was disgusting to see first hand the effects of democracy on the people of MT, what I mean is we really paid the price for switching up our legislature so much and to the right. There was a legislator who was an ex- FBI agent and made sure that part of the "new" act would include a F.B.I. registry that all caregivers would have to abide too, before this any mmj raids went down without the help of the F.B.I., but since they have been included in every one. Montanans are extremely libertarian at nature, shit there was no speed limit when I was growing up until the fed gov threatened to take away highway funds, that is what the majority thought they were voting for in the Tea Party....less government, its been anything but that in practice though. It really does matter which party we have in office if we want this mmj/mj movement to rock on! Hope all is good today fellow farmers, I am about to hit up some grapeitty grapefruit and make my day much better!Neither Republicans nor Democrats in any state can claim responsibility for the medical programs in those states- the voting public did that based on education and experience, not party lines or affiliations.
California is much different. It is the 6th largest economy in the world I think, and surely the largest economy in the U.S., federal interference is kept to a minimum here most of the time it seems. You are right about the people in CA changing local laws, but even here its democratic governors and legislators that are standing up for mmj, from Newsome to Pelosi......I don't see Issa or any of the CA republicans touting states rights over mmj here, at least from what I have seen.I live in Ca. and can say with out A doubt, that peoples support for mmj and the shear numbers of them have indeed trumped Federal Law and legislation in Ca. to the point that local law enforcement polices have changed for the better under almost every circumstance and polices dictated by federal gov. are not enforced here to the letter by any mesure or view. The "people" here are responsible for setting that bar on the mmj front that All other states lagged far behind and that is A fact and I can guarantee that every person involved in that positive movement for mmj is neither Dem. or Rep. Natural Therapy's views would seem to support the circumstances in Ca. @ least... more than yours, but alas, to each their own...