M
mendel
- 2,038
- 263
Wishing you the best of luck w your case TK.
Your definatley right about the average Joe grower with 6-12 having no issues at all. I pushed and pushed the limits for sure but still had paperwork to back it all up..unfortunately you have to still go chat about it in court in order to defend your rights
City ordinances are goin to be more and more pains in the ass as time goes on...charge ya for inspect and reinspect, charge ya for being over, charge ya to have a permitted grow, charge ya to get it to code....
I think the small personal grower is goin to be so common that they are not goin ot even bother, but anybody killin it or even kinda killin it your goin to have to be on your toes
Just make sure when you come you bring and spend lots of money and you LEAVE when you are broke.I think the state retail model is countin on that out of state canna tourism more than you think...ammend 64 may have only added a couple hundred thousand new potheads to add to the rolls but you add the out of staters its goin to be a windfall of folks comin to partake
The big businesses are calling the shots at the Capital regarding the MJ reg's.
The only way you can change this is to go down there yourself and lobby or hire a lobbyist.
Don't forget about the legislation to lower the potency. LETS ALL COME TO COLORADO AND GET SOME POT THAT IS TAXED OUT THE ASS AND WON'T EVEN GET YOU HIGH.folks I know have. My local mayor is lobbying for business models that won't shut out the little guys/mom and pops. I think they are getting some traction. As to the ultimate success of the retail scheme, who but a tourist would buy pot with a 40% tax? No one in my area.
@JG: I think most people on this forum are banking on them fucking it up and the Fed coming in a shutting down the clown show. May have better luck getting the people who worry about a drug test than the ones who worry about a rogue DA to work the campaigning.