• Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • The Breeders Lab
  • Breeding talk for everyone to understand

Breeding talk for everyone to understand

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chad.Westport
  • Start date Start date Oct 25, 2020
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Breeding talk for everyone to understand

Chad.Westport Oct 25, 2020 247 Replies 26,093 Views
Page 1 of 13 · Replies 1–20 of 248
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 13
Next
1 of 13 Next Last

Chad.Westport

Posts
553
Reactions
947
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Points
93
Oct 25, 2020
#1
Hey guys / gals. Moving this over here instead of hijacking Aquamans thread.

Last question asked was - how can I learn more and what am I looking for.

Two principles are mandatory for understanding traditional breeding (male to female), the first is genetic inheritance which was best outlined by Gregor Mendel with his pea experiment. Another thing to familiarize yourself with is the Hardy-Weinberg Model.

If you're looking for a great book, but a very dry and science type read, go for :The Cannabis Breeders Bible" by Greg Green
 
Reactions: GimpDaddy, DistyDemon, Fudge and 9 others
Quote Reply

Chad.Westport

Posts
553
Reactions
947
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Points
93
Oct 25, 2020
#2
@Dirtbag @Aqua Man @SequoyahCannabisCo @amekins @Anthem @Grownsince95 @Milson
 
Reactions: Dirtbag, amekins, SacredTreeOrganicFarms and 2 others
Quote Reply

Hortulanus

Posts
713
Reactions
2,138
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Points
243
Oct 25, 2020
#3
Pulling up a chair.
 
Reactions: jikjikkles, Fudge, amekins and 3 others
Quote Reply

Chad.Westport

Posts
553
Reactions
947
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Points
93
Oct 25, 2020
#4
Now if you have a large enough budget, you are mapping the genome and learning which alleles turn functions on or off, or what type of expression they represent. The science is getting greater everyday, but this is nothing that will be available to the home breeder. This is how plants will be patented. Specific genetic markers and by chemotype. In their world, there is no such thing as Sativa or indica.
 
Reactions: GimpDaddy, Kanzeon, MIMedGrower and 4 others
Quote Reply

Aqua Man

Posts
26,479
Reactions
59,693
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Points
638
Oct 25, 2020
#5
Thank @Chad.Westport.

Tagging ppl involved.
@Dirtbag @lilnew @Grownsince95 @Anthem @amekins @SequoyahCannabisCo @Akabudz @Milson @BurnzYzBudZz @dire wolf @Pondracer @Moshmen and I'm sure @Frankster would enjoy this.

Hope I didn't miss anyone.
 
Reactions: BurnzYzBudZz, Moshmen, amekins and 4 others
Quote Reply

Aqua Man

Posts
26,479
Reactions
59,693
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Points
638
Oct 25, 2020
#6
Ok and we are off. I appreciate the help here @Chad.Westport I have ordered that book and looking forward to finally understanding what I have tried to avoid for a long time now.
 

Attachments

  • 20201025_145606.jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 284
Reactions: fishbuds, 098765433109, DistyDemon and 6 others
Quote Reply

Grownsince95

Supporter
🤘😆👍
Posts
4,287
Reactions
14,711
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Points
263
Oct 25, 2020
#7
Chad.Westport said:
Now if you have a large enough budget, you are mapping the genome and learning which alleles turn functions on or off, or what type of expression they represent. The science is getting greater everyday, but this is nothing that will be available to the home breeder. This is how plants will be patented. Specific genetic markers and by chemotype. In their world, there is no such thing as Sativa or indica.
Click to expand...
I was just reading about a company called phylos that was claiming to map cannabis genetics for people, like 23 and me for weed lol but then pivoted and starting using the info for their own breeding...now that big agro is involved its all going to go to shit
 
Reactions: GimpDaddy, Kanzeon, amekins and 3 others
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#8
Hortulanus said:
Pulling up a chair.
Click to expand...
Seriously. I’m a sponge to breeding
 
Reactions: amekins, Chad.Westport, Aqua Man and 1 other person
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#9
Aqua Man said:
Ok and we are off. I appreciate the help here @Chad.Westport I have ordered that book and looking forward to finally understanding what I have tried to avoid for a long time now.
Click to expand...
Literally me rn
 
Reactions: amekins and Aqua Man
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#10
Aqua Man said:
Ok and we are off. I appreciate the help here @Chad.Westport I have ordered that book and looking forward to finally understanding what I have tried to avoid for a long time now.
Click to expand...
Yoooo this came out in 2004.....? Do you think this is a little dated?
 
Reactions: amekins and Aqua Man
Quote Reply

Aqua Man

Posts
26,479
Reactions
59,693
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Points
638
Oct 25, 2020
#11
SequoyahCannabisCo said:
Yoooo this came out in 2004.....? Do you think this is a little dated?
Click to expand...
Not until other science proves it wrong. In most of the studies i read some are from the 40's and 50's and still ring true. It's good to also understand the evolution of the science and in terms of science i would say its still fairly new. Basics first before you can understand the rest.
 
Reactions: jikjikkles, GimpDaddy, DistyDemon and 6 others
Quote Reply

Chad.Westport

Posts
553
Reactions
947
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Points
93
Oct 25, 2020
#12
Phylos is a great thing gone wrong.

They were looking at a few of the genetic markers of plants and mapping them in the "galaxy" in order to establish linear connections between strains. This is a great concept but slightly flawed in the fact that the person who bought the sour diesel clone, which really isn't sour diesel, who sends in his sample to get mapped has labeled it as sour diesel. Strains like that have been entered dozens of times by different growers and you can see the variation. Is everything was a true sour diesel, they would almost overlap each other. But that anomaly aside, it gives a path people can use to try and understand traits and breed with that info.

They are cutting edge, doing important stuff that no one else was and very few currently are. That excited many growers because if your intellectual property is in the public domain and someone (big corps) try and patent that strain when it goes federally legal, you have a legal argument that it is yours and can be demonstrated through this testing and being in the public domain with a timestamp. Who wouldn't want to potentially protect themselves in the future from something like that? So many top breeders sent them samples of rare genetic material, something that would never normally happen.

Where phylos went wrong and earned the scorn of most breeders is that they said they would never sell this information to big AG. They said that phylos would never begin there own breeding programs using this data. Thats a pretty big deal and why many of the very tight fisted breeders sent material to be mapped. Phylos was saying this up until they got caught by a leaked video at a closed door business / investor conference where they were pitching the sale of this info to big AG and they announced they were beginning their own breeding service. So, they stabbed everyone in the back for money, but thats business for ya.
 
Reactions: Happydude32ed, GimpDaddy, revfunk and 5 others
Quote Reply

Aqua Man

Posts
26,479
Reactions
59,693
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Points
638
Oct 25, 2020
#13
So @Chad.Westport if you took s1 fems and did the old CS trick you get s2's and of those 25% would be carry more mother traits 25% father and 50% mixed... is this correct? If so then is there a way to back cross and stabilize those genetics?
 
Reactions: amekins and Chad.Westport
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#14
Aqua Man said:
Not until other science proves it wrong. In most of the studies i read some are from the 40's and 50's and still ring true. It's good to also understand the evolution of the science and in terms of science i would say its still fairly new. Basics first before you can understand the rest.
Click to expand...
Very true, and Gregg green is dope. I usually follow Ed rose and Jorge Cervantes. But I’d strongly say Green is #3 in reputation. Grow bible is amazing!
 
Reactions: Kanzeon, amekins, Chad.Westport and 1 other person
Quote Reply

Chad.Westport

Posts
553
Reactions
947
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Points
93
Oct 25, 2020
#15
SequoyahCannabisCo said:
Yoooo this came out in 2004.....? Do you think this is a little dated?
Click to expand...
In some ways yes. The talk about autos is that the industry isn't there, they can't be trusted, low yields etc. It does talk a lot about different formulas to use to reverse plants though. I think its a good overview for people who want to do traditional breeding or want to understand how to select for various traits in Cannabis.
 
Reactions: GimpDaddy, Kanzeon, amekins and 3 others
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#16
Chad.Westport said:
Phylos is a great thing gone wrong.

They were looking at a few of the genetic markers of plants and mapping them in the "galaxy" in order to establish linear connections between strains. This is a great concept but slightly flawed in the fact that the person who bought the sour diesel clone, which really isn't sour diesel, who sends in his sample to get mapped has labeled it as sour diesel. Strains like that have been entered dozens of times by different growers and you can see the variation. Is everything was a true sour diesel, they would almost overlap each other. But that anomaly aside, it gives a path people can use to try and understand traits and breed with that info.

They are cutting edge, doing important stuff that no one else was and very few currently are. That excited many growers because if your intellectual property is in the public domain and someone (big corps) try and patent that strain when it goes federally legal, you have a legal argument that it is yours and can be demonstrated through this testing and being in the public domain with a timestamp. Who wouldn't want to potentially protect themselves in the future from something like that? So many top breeders sent them samples of rare genetic material, something that would never normally happen.

Where phylos went wrong and earned the scorn of most breeders is that they said they would never sell this information to big AG. They said that phylos would never begin there own breeding programs using this data. Thats a pretty big deal and why many of the very tight fisted breeders sent material to be mapped. Phylos was saying this up until they got caught by a leaked video at a closed door business / investor conference where they were pitching the sale of this info to big AG and they announced they were beginning their own breeding service. So, they stabbed everyone in the back for money, but thats business for ya.
Click to expand...
I feel like that’s why the industry is tryna move to narrow,,broad, etc.
 
Reactions: amekins, Chad.Westport and Aqua Man
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#17
Chad.Westport said:
In some ways yes. The talk about autos is that the industry isn't there, they can't be trusted, low yields etc. It does talk a lot about different formulas to use to reverse plants though. I think its a good overview for people who want to do traditional breeding or want to understand how to select for various traits in Cannabis.
Click to expand...
Appreciate that! And it seems like a good read!
 
Reactions: amekins, Chad.Westport and Aqua Man
Quote Reply

SacredTreeOrganicFarms

Supporter
Sacred Tree Organic Farms
Posts
324
Reactions
444
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Points
63
Oct 25, 2020
#18
Chad.Westport said:
In some ways yes. The talk about autos is that the industry isn't there, they can't be trusted, low yields etc. It does talk a lot about different formulas to use to reverse plants though. I think its a good overview for people who want to do traditional breeding or want to understand how to select for various traits in Cannabis.
Click to expand...
Does the book go into terminology too? S1 f1 and all that? I’m very new to breeding !
 
Reactions: Moshmen, amekins, Chad.Westport and 1 other person
Quote Reply

Aqua Man

Posts
26,479
Reactions
59,693
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Points
638
Oct 25, 2020
#19
Chad.Westport said:
Phylos is a great thing gone wrong.

They were looking at a few of the genetic markers of plants and mapping them in the "galaxy" in order to establish linear connections between strains. This is a great concept but slightly flawed in the fact that the person who bought the sour diesel clone, which really isn't sour diesel, who sends in his sample to get mapped has labeled it as sour diesel. Strains like that have been entered dozens of times by different growers and you can see the variation. Is everything was a true sour diesel, they would almost overlap each other. But that anomaly aside, it gives a path people can use to try and understand traits and breed with that info.

They are cutting edge, doing important stuff that no one else was and very few currently are. That excited many growers because if your intellectual property is in the public domain and someone (big corps) try and patent that strain when it goes federally legal, you have a legal argument that it is yours and can be demonstrated through this testing and being in the public domain with a timestamp. Who wouldn't want to potentially protect themselves in the future from something like that? So many top breeders sent them samples of rare genetic material, something that would never normally happen.

Where phylos went wrong and earned the scorn of most breeders is that they said they would never sell this information to big AG. They said that phylos would never begin there own breeding programs using this data. Thats a pretty big deal and why many of the very tight fisted breeders sent material to be mapped. Phylos was saying this up until they got caught by a leaked video at a closed door business / investor conference where they were pitching the sale of this info to big AG and they announced they were beginning their own breeding service. So, they stabbed everyone in the back for money, but thats business for ya.
Click to expand...
Like I said in my thread its a dirty business full of politics. I just don't fully understand the depth. But wow
 
Reactions: Kanzeon, amekins, MIMedGrower and 2 others
Quote Reply

Grownsince95

Supporter
🤘😆👍
Posts
4,287
Reactions
14,711
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Points
263
Oct 25, 2020
#20
Here's my 1st question as it applies to what I want to do..

If I use a father plant to pollinate several different female plants of different strains, those F1's would all share the common parent so crossing the desirable female offspring with the father creates the first back cross?... Would it be more beneficial to back cross the F2 generation because of the extended variation? Also because the different F1's share a common parent they are all related in a way right? Crossing those would create a multi hybrid?

I also just ordered that book btw thanks
 
Reactions: jikjikkles, GimpDaddy, amekins and 2 others
Quote Reply
Page 1 of 13 · Replies 1–20 of 248
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 13
Next
1 of 13 Next Last

Thread info

Replies 247
Views 26,093
Started Oct 25, 2020
Latest post May 18, 2021
Starter Chad.Westport
Forum The Breeders Lab

Latest posts

  • Cpurola's Outdoor grow in Southeast Michigan 2026
    • Latest: grayoldnproud
    • 1 minute ago
    General Outdoor Growing
  • Lemon Cherry Gelato from ILGM seed.
    • Latest: Smokey0418
    • Today at 6:58 AM
    Grow Diaries
  • Eternal Sun 2026 outdoor garden grow
    • Latest: cpurola
    • Today at 6:52 AM
    General Outdoor Growing
  • Greeeeetinggs!
    • Latest: Strainshow2.0
    • Today at 5:18 AM
    Introduce Yourself
  • Strainshow is back
    • Latest: Strainshow2.0
    • Today at 5:15 AM
    Introduce Yourself
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • The Breeders Lab
  • Breeding talk for everyone to understand
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2026 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Sign up

  • Home
  • News
  • Classifieds
  • Forums
    • What's new Featured content New posts New Articles New articles New products Latest activity
  • Social
  • Strains
  • Live
  • Learn
  • Brands
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?