By David Smith
@SDNDavidSmith
Posted Feb. 19, 2014 @ 9:26 am
A joint effort is underway between the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors, citizens and law enforcement to determine how to best address medical marijuana cultivation in the county’s unincorporated areas.
Law enforcement officers and medical marijuana patients gathered at Tuesday’s meeting of the board as Sheriff Jon Lopey introduced a proposed ordinance to regulate the cultivation of marijuana for medicinal purposes.
Lopey drew the ire from the audience when he presented photos of Adam Lanza – the man who killed 20 children at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012 – and other killers and told the board that the men were all marijuana smokers. The overall tone of the meeting was not confrontational, however.
Lopey described the reasons that he feels the regulation should be in place, then members of the audience provided input on the direction of the ordinance. “We’re not here to penalize legitimate medical users,” Lopey said. He explained that the main thrust of the ordinance was to mitigate potential odor nuisances and access by children to medical grow operations.
Measures in the proposed ordinance include a maximum grow area of 100 square feet, regardless of parcel size, and a prohibition on cultivating marijuana within 1,000 feet of any school, church, park or youth-oriented facility.
The general consensus coming from public commenters was that cultivation should be regulated, but the 100 square-foot limit was contested as being too restrictive and inadequate to fulfill some prescriptions.
There were also numerous requests for the source material behind some of the statistics Lopey cited – including the claim that 57 percent of serious crimes are linked to marijuana.
Lopey told the board that he could provide the studies he cited, and have the presentation he had prepared posted to the Sheriff’s Office website.
One commenter said that law enforcement should have no say in a doctor’s medical decision, while another said that she feels the ordinance is not restrictive enough due to an adverse reaction to the smell of marijuana.
Other issues that came up included the possible violation of HIPAA guidelines in requiring patients to register with the county, and the county possibly inheriting criminal liability by requiring a fee for activities still considered illegal under federal law.
Others called on the board to research and understand the issue better before making a decision, and District 2 Supervisor Ed Valenzuela said that he feels there should be more dialogue with the public.
The board ultimately decided that the county should organize public meetings in four sectors of the county to gather further input before submitting an ordinance for a first reading. Those meetings, to be held in the north, south, west and east parts of the county, will be organized by county staff and reported at a later date.
The marijuana discussion comes after supporters collected enough signatures to get the legalization question before California voters this year. On Feb. 12, a bipartisan group of Congressional representatives sent President Barack Obama a letter urging marijuana’s removal from the federal list of prohibited “Schedule 1” drugs.
“Classifying marijuana as Schedule 1 at the federal level perpetuates an unjust and irrational system. Schedule 1 recognizes no medical use, disregarding both medical evidence and the laws of nearly half of the states that have legalized medical marijuana,” the letter states.