• Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • Advanced Techniques & Problems
  • Gavita vs. E-Papillon **Much Anticipated Video**

Gavita vs. E-Papillon **Much Anticipated Video**

  • Thread starter Thread starter GR33NL3AF
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2014
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Gavita vs. E-Papillon **Much Anticipated Video**

GR33NL3AF Jul 30, 2014 54 Replies 21,765 Views
Page 3 of 3 · Replies 41–55 of 55
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

sixstring

Posts
7,079
Reactions
29,605
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Points
313
Dec 7, 2014
#41
I would have liked to see all those tests mg did in an open room with the same grid placed on the floor instead of a tent with reflective walls.i mean these lights dont even really work in tents lol, I would bet the footprints and micromols/lumens would be much dif between epap and gavita.in my open room the gavita does not put out a square fp.it does feel a bit like we have to beg for any info in some of these threads, and then we get lil tidbits here n there.idk maybe im just not reading into these threads right lol.
 
Quote Reply

GR33NL3AF

Posts
1,904
Reactions
3,169
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Points
263
Dec 7, 2014
#42
Herb Forester said:
Was waiting to see what you came up with but think I'm getting the picture now. All this talking out of school is a little disappointing.
Click to expand...
lol, let's get something straight here Herb, I'm not here to impress you or anyone else, simply to report my findings. Whether I went to school for such testing is none of your business and this forum is not a place for me to post my credentials. If you're so concerned about getting the 'right' fixture then grab yourself what's available and do your own side-by-sides. That's the one thing polluting this industry, individuals who want all the data without doing their own research.
 
Reactions: Werunwild69, DapperDon, lollipopman and 2 others
Quote Reply

GR33NL3AF

Posts
1,904
Reactions
3,169
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Points
263
Dec 7, 2014
#43
sixstring said:
I would have liked to see all those tests mg did in an open room with the same grid placed on the floor instead of a tent with reflective walls.i mean these lights dont even really work in tents lol, I would bet the footprints and micromols/lumens would be much dif between epap and gavita.in my open room the gavita does not put out a square fp.it does feel a bit like we have to beg for any info in some of these threads, and then we get lil tidbits here n there.idk maybe im just not reading into these threads right lol.
Click to expand...
Six, MG's videos are suppose to help you make decisions not make them for you. I understand every video that we've done can be picked apart but they are just there to offer insight to various questions grower's have. It would take decades of extensive testing to definitively say one things works better then the other.
 
Reactions: sixstring and masshole61
Quote Reply

sixstring

Posts
7,079
Reactions
29,605
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Points
313
Dec 7, 2014
#44
@GR33NL3AF I do make my own decisions and im not picking your videos apart.that test would be great for air cooled hoods as thats what we use in a tent.im saying the walls changed the results of a fixture intended for use in wide open spaces.it helps some but with these being so bright I'm sure theres light bouncing all over in the tent.also ill take this opportunity to add that lumens are just as important as mols and or spectrum.we want all 3 for big ops so we get good coverage AND penitration well into the canopy.if it was just about spectum a well desinged l.e.d would always win right? I see some cmh grows that look ok but those plants are tiny for the most part, yet the par and cri is supposedly way better than hps.
on a personal level, when a grower asks me questions about my plants, equipment , nutes or growing style I dont feel threatened or the need to hide any info I may have.i give as much info as possible regardless of how big or small the person asking is.i always have tried to help others with tips and info, and give honest reviews on equipment I have tested which is alot lol.ill be building a few rooms in the near future for myself and others just as I always have.in my room I will probably be mixing gavitas and nanolux with gavitas along the walls and the nanos down the middles, mostly because nano offers more hood options and based on all these light threads these damn fixtures are all very close.
 
Reactions: fishwhistle
Quote Reply

jumpincactus

Supporter
Premium Member
Posts
11,605
Reactions
35,935
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Points
438
Dec 7, 2014
#45
GR33NL3AF said:
lol, let's get something straight here Herb, I'm not here to impress you or anyone else, simply to report my findings. Whether I went to school for such testing is none of your business and this forum is not a place for me to post my credentials. If you're so concerned about getting the 'right' fixture then grab yourself what's available and do your own side-by-sides. That's the one thing polluting this industry, individuals who want all the data without doing their own research.
Click to expand...



That's the one thing polluting this industry, individuals who want all the data without doing their own research.

@GR33NL3AF Why do the words "entitlement", or "lazy" come to my mind....... Now that was a general statement, not aimed at anyone in particular......peace ........ Thanks for the video bro
 
Reactions: Werunwild69 and GR33NL3AF
Quote Reply

sixstring

Posts
7,079
Reactions
29,605
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Points
313
Dec 7, 2014
#46
jumpincactus said:
That's the one thing polluting this industry, individuals who want all the data without doing their own research.

@GR33NL3AF Why do the words "entitlement", or "lazy" come to my mind....... Now that was a general statement, not aimed at anyone in particular......peace ........ Thanks for the video bro
Click to expand...
its human nature for new members or old to NOT want to sift through the 50,000 threads or over 1 million posts here to find answers to their questions lol.are we here for bragging only or to share info methods and pics?
green has made reference to 100 and 200 light grows repeatedly as if he really knows his stuff so guys are asking him technical questions about what he sells because they /I believe he knows what he is talking about based on past posts.how many 100 light ops do you see here at the farm? Anybody? Maybe TK if you add all his builds together or doc Dre . so that reference to 200 light ops is for what? See now im going off track over a simple question lol.think im about done with this topic.....cooltubes rock :)
 
Reactions: Lurkin4yrs and jumpincactus
Quote Reply

jumpincactus

Supporter
Premium Member
Posts
11,605
Reactions
35,935
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Points
438
Dec 7, 2014
#47
Point taken. Thanks
 
Reactions: sixstring
Quote Reply
G

Greeninthumb

Posts
28
Reactions
18
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Points
3
Dec 7, 2014
#48
Herb Forester said:
Last I checked PL are only for 277V and up? @GR33NL3AF which light labs does Monster Gardens use for your tests?
Click to expand...
120/240 version is just hitting the grow ops in about 2 weeks. Many are already spoken for so I think it will be January before they will be in the stores.
 
Reactions: Herb Forester and sixstring
Quote Reply

Offdarips

Posts
93
Reactions
47
Joined
Aug 2, 2014
Points
18
Dec 7, 2014
#49
DirtySanchez said:
It really all boils down to YOUR APPLICATION. Closet growers and those outside the commercial world, don't buy paps. Gavita has a much harder downward throw of light which would make it the more practical grow for a smaller grow. Now on a commercial grow the ePap is in many cases a better option. The real key here is the reflector like others have mentioned. For growers with no plant count restrictions growing large numbers of small plants (focusing on tops) EPAP IS HANDS DOWN YOUR BEST OPTION. The reflector is made to project a large spread (up to 5x6). While it does have SOME decent downward penetration, it's real strength is that it can illuminate an extremely large area very well. Don't get me wrong, I have seems seen some setups with TREES rocking paps doing very well. 3.4per light on a 60 dayer, that's not a typo. I've suggested to Lights Interaction on numerous occasions they make a "perimeter" reflector for lights on the side rows. The one (albeit slight) downside to paps is you are illuminating the walls on the perimeter of your grow rather than throwing the light down where you need it. The "side light" thrown is actually what makes the paps special on larger grows, except for on the outer rows. It may not seem like a lot but I'm about MAXIMIZING efficiency and production and any waste is still waste.

Keep in mind these setups were all originally designed for the Dutch market where small plants and greenhouse applications are the most common. These fixtures run hotter and need to be placed higher above the canopy than a traditional hps light. This is due to the fact again they were made for the Dutch greenhouse market that can accommodate for this.

I do agree with whoever said this test does not properly measure the capability and efficiency of these lights on large scale (with the majority of these lights being sold to commercial growers). It does however show the results of a single light in a tent... If that's what you're interested in knowing ;)

Wtf is a PL anyway?
Click to expand...



Here's some info on PL lighting
They will customize any lighting for your grow.
Bravo lighting in Denver sells them.
 
Reactions: Herb Forester, Greeninthumb and sixstring
Quote Reply
G

Greeninthumb

Posts
28
Reactions
18
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Points
3
Dec 9, 2014
#50
I found a guy at a trade show going around testing all the reflectors and lamp outputs. He said he was going to publish his findings. I said how do you know how old any of the lamps are in the fixtures your hanging. He said " it doesn't matter" little does he know it DOES matter.
That is the problem I see in the industry. people will put out any info to show they have the best fixtures without really knowing what they are doing. Not pointing to anyone here, but in general.
Talk to someone who really knows their stuff and ask questions.
You can tell who really knows and who doesn't normally.
 
Quote Reply

Herb Forester

Posts
766
Reactions
1,442
Joined
May 6, 2013
Points
143
Dec 14, 2014
#51
GR33NL3AF said:
lol, let's get something straight here Herb, I'm not here to impress you or anyone else, simply to report my findings. Whether I went to school for such testing is none of your business and this forum is not a place for me to post my credentials. If you're so concerned about getting the 'right' fixture then grab yourself what's available and do your own side-by-sides. That's the one thing polluting this industry, individuals who want all the data without doing their own research.
Click to expand...
You had already sold me on trying some Nano fixtures but I was waiting to hear on the lamp upgrades (as I said in our pm conversation). I'm not impressed with anything from Genesis so far, they don't even have basic terminology straight (from doing my own research). If you're going to boast about being R&D director of a company, I think it's reasonable to ask what you know and decide for ourselves if we're confident in your products. This is exactly why many of us are so confident with Gavita.
 
Quote Reply

GR33NL3AF

Posts
1,904
Reactions
3,169
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Points
263
Dec 14, 2014
#52
Herb Forester said:
You had already sold me on trying some Nano fixtures but I was waiting to hear on the lamp upgrades (as I said in our pm conversation). I'm not impressed with anything from Genesis so far, they don't even have basic terminology straight (from doing my own research). If you're going to boast about being R&D director of a company, I think it's reasonable to ask what you know and decide for ourselves if we're confident in your products. This is exactly why many of us are so confident with Gavita.
Click to expand...
LOL because you trust Jair?

Don't use words like 'we're' and 'us', I've never had a customer that's unsatisfied with my answer to a pointless question. I took my time to answer your questions even though they were just that, pointless, you even admitted this through PM. Who cares about UV and Genesis' claims about UVA and UVB, the only output that matters is Micromul (PAR) and Lumens. So to say you're not impressed with Genesis, BEFORE EVEN RUNNING THEIR BULB, is absurd.

I save my time and my knowledge for individuals who are not going to waste it.
 
Reactions: Greeninthumb
Quote Reply

Herb Forester

Posts
766
Reactions
1,442
Joined
May 6, 2013
Points
143
Dec 14, 2014
#53
Please stop misrepresenting our pm conversation and I will stop wasting your time. Best of luck with your business.

GR33NL3AF said:
LOL because you trust Jair?

Don't use words like 'we're' and 'us', I've never had a customer that's unsatisfied with my answer to a pointless question. I took my time to answer your questions even though they were just that, pointless, you even admitted this through PM. Who cares about UV and Genesis' claims about UVA and UVB, the only output that matters is Micromul (PAR) and Lumens. So to say you're not impressed with Genesis, BEFORE EVEN RUNNING THEIR BULB, is absurd.

I save my time and my knowledge for individuals who are not going to waste it.
Click to expand...
 
Quote Reply
G

Greeninthumb

Posts
28
Reactions
18
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Points
3
Dec 16, 2014
#54
I saw the new footprints for the PL, Gavita, E-PAP and Hydrofarm DE at the Emerald cup this past weekend. They said it is getting verified by a third party very soon.
The PL BETA reflector out performed all the others hands down.
They hope to release the data soon.
Numbers don't lie..........
 
Reactions: fishwhistle and sixstring
Quote Reply

MegaWatt

Posts
2
Reactions
3
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Points
3
Jan 20, 2016
#55
<div style="text-align: center;"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fpZhR9Z0IQI" allowfullscreen="" width="640" frameborder="0" height="360"></iframe></div>
<br>
PL Light NXT2: 97.4% efficiency <br>
Competitor A = Gavita 80.7% efficiency <br>
&bull; Competitor B = Agrolux 83.3% efficiency <br>
&bull; Competitor C = Phantom 90.1% efficiency <br>
&bull; Competitor D = ePapillon (Lights Interaction) 86.4% efficiency <br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.megawatthydro.com/en/new...1/med-nxt2-hps-1000w-240v-wphilips-lamp-58140">Click here to go directly to product</a><br>
<br>
 
Quote Reply
Page 3 of 3 · Replies 41–55 of 55
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Thread info

Replies 54
Views 21,765
Started Jul 30, 2014
Latest post Jan 20, 2016
Starter GR33NL3AF
Forum Advanced Techniques & Problems

Latest posts

  • Cpurola's Outdoor grow in Southeast Michigan 2026
    • Latest: Leste
    • 9 minutes ago
    General Outdoor Growing
  • 2026 Outdoor Grows! let's see em!
    • Latest: FarmerScotty
    • 10 minutes ago
    General Outdoor Growing
  • Cap junky seeds from seed junky
    • Latest: Clearbluesky
    • 54 minutes ago
    General Indoor Growing
  • Wins, Royal Cherries 🍒 Organic Grow.
    • Latest: WinJr63
    • Today at 4:30 AM
    Grow Diaries
  • D
    What do you make of these purple marks on my seedlings
    • Latest: Dankster47
    • Today at 1:54 AM
    General Indoor Growing
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Medical Cannabis Cultivation
  • Advanced Techniques & Problems
  • Gavita vs. E-Papillon **Much Anticipated Video**
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2026 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Sign up

  • Home
  • News
  • Classifieds
  • Forums
    • What's new Featured content New posts New Articles New articles New products Latest activity
  • Social
  • Strains
  • Live
  • Learn
  • Brands
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?