Joseph29
- 93
- 18
fyi, GH bought that Dr. Nodes and after it didn't fly they Bush Loaded it, mainly because people still call the hydroshops daily and ask for poison so they can grow dense buds as they haven't figured out how to grow dense goodness without toxic help it seems. It's bad, mmmmkkkkay!Its the EXACT same thing as Bushmaster. I've used Dr. Nodes but it isn't available on the market anymore...haha I still have a secret stash...
And if anyone says it's not bad for your health, then it's bad for your bud! Bottom line imo
I used to run it when I was commercially growing strains like Sour Diesel or stretchy OGs - The stuff is sketch though, I would completely cover up when using it. It is no longer in my lineup. Nodes would definitely stop stretch and fattin' up the buds but I noticed a substantial decrease in quality.
Yep, its for people that wanna maximize $$ with yields and don't care about quality and don't know how to grow big yields without cheater bottled poison!! Sounds like you know what I'm talking about Gr33nleaf, stuff takes off quality for extra density, looks go and it doesn't taste good...mainly a commersh thing.Most likely, when I worked for a hydro store this shit flew off the shelves! I've found now if you know your strain and have a solid feeding schedule there is NO need for shit like this.
Yep, its for people that wanna maximize $$ with yields and don't care about quality and don't know how to grow big yields without cheater bottled poison!! Sounds like you know what I'm talking about Gr33nleaf, stuff takes off quality for extra density, looks go and it doesn't taste good...mainly a commersh thing.
LOL yeah yeah yeah, you probably use the stuff every grow and don't want us to compete with you. KIDDING!!! lolProbably shouldn't share this but, I swear that a buddy of mine, who used it without care, (no gloves, short sleeves etc) actually noticed a couple new 'moles' over time
LOL yeah yeah yeah, you probably use the stuff every grow and don't want us to compete with you. KIDDING!!! lol
Not to stir the pot more but I was talking to the GH rep (assume everyone, especially if it's coming from the rep's mouth, has a bias) and when I was bringing up the potential health issues with paclo the reassured me that they have spent the past year and around 2 million in testing this to make sure that it wasn't a health risk for consumers.
Now, whether or not there is any truth to this, I think it's important to recognize that regardless of whether or not a product contains the same ingredient, are there grades or levels of refinement that would change it's potential health issues? Kind of like Iso-Butane vs N-Butane?
Definitely agree on that being an easy and most likely accurate assumption. I wouldn't be surprised if it was to protect themselves against a cannabis related suit though because apparently we're the only farmers actively concerned with Paclo and consumables.if they knew that they would not label it for ornamentals only. Just a quick thought.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?