Log In Register

Grow number two, making space

Topping autos is some pretty controversial stuff! πŸ˜ƒπŸ‘ I love the fearless approach! ❀🌱❀
Home Forums Medical Cannabis Cultivation Grow Diaries Grow number two, making space
Grow diary eligible · Medical Cannabis Cultivation

Grow number two, making space

by amekins · Started
1d
Running
0
Updates
1,261
Replies
0
Images
Discussion below · 1,261 replies
Page 7 of 64 · Replies 121–140 of 1,262
Topping autos is some pretty controversial stuff! πŸ˜ƒπŸ‘

I love the fearless approach! ❀🌱❀

What's the controversy? I assume the usual diminishing returns, but do they not have the lifespan to recover/benefit from pruning? Is their structure maybe too columnar to have productive nodes?
Ruderalis is such a foreign concept to me, which, being in a northern climate, seems a bit treasonous.
 
What's the controversy? I assume the usual diminishing returns, but do they not have the lifespan to recover/benefit from pruning? Is their structure maybe too columnar to have productive nodes?
Ruderalis is such a foreign concept to me, which, being in a northern climate, seems a bit treasonous.
I was sort of half kidding actually, but I do read things like you you shouldn't slow them down or stress them at all. I think if done young topping should be fine and maybe set the plant back just a day or two. Idk I'm growing my first auto now πŸ‘
 
What's the controversy? I assume the usual diminishing returns, but do they not have the lifespan to recover/benefit from pruning? Is their structure maybe too columnar to have productive nodes?
Ruderalis is such a foreign concept to me, which, being in a northern climate, seems a bit treasonous.
The life span is the question. The thing about autos is they set the timing and so recovery time is limited.

I have seen a grower do well with topping a plant, but the overall weight did not change. Idk if his quality was better.
 
The life span is the question. The thing about autos is they set the timing and so recovery time is limited.

I have seen a grower do well with topping a plant, but the overall weight did not change. Idk if his quality was better.
I have 1 going thats about a week younger than Amy's and I'm not touching it. So time will tell...
 
Time to recover from topping with a limited life span. We’ll see if it was a mistake or not. They all looked sad and droopy today and watering didn’t help at all.
 
Time to recover from topping with a limited life span. We’ll see if it was a mistake or not. They all looked sad and droopy today and watering didn’t help at all.
It was chilly around these parts right? My tents went down to the low 60's last night
 
The life span is the question. The thing about autos is they set the timing and so recovery time is limited.

I have seen a grower do well with topping a plant, but the overall weight did not change. Idk if his quality was better.

Interesting.
So, theoretically, by topping, you could further utilize their stout structure to your advantage in spaces with even greater height constraints?
If weight and (maybe) quality are negligibly effected, seems like just another tool in the belt to me.
I guess the debate is then when to top. My figuring would be that you just don't want to disrupt hormone cycles at the wrong time.
 
Interesting.
So, theoretically, by topping, you could further utilize their stout structure to your advantage in spaces with even greater height constraints?
If weight and (maybe) quality are negligibly effected, seems like just another tool in the belt to me.
I guess the debate is then when to top. My figuring would be that you just don't want to disrupt hormone cycles at the wrong time.
I have some really really slow auto strains. Knowing now what I do? I'd have just mainlined the things instead of growing 6 ft trees outside. I think mine were all about poor genetics though. With respect to when to chop. Hormones? I've never paid attention to them. I'd just do the standard grow to 6, chop to the third. Lay them out straight and flat. Top to the third on both ends. Chop node 2 off on both ends. And then let veg continue.
 
Last edited:
I have some really really slow auto strains. Knowing now what I do? I'd have just mainlined the things instead of growing 6 ft trees outside. I think mine were all about poor genetics though. With respect to when to chop. Hormones? I've never paid attention to them. I'd just do the standard grow to 6, chop to the third. Lay them out straight and flat. Top to the third on both ends. Chop node 2 off on both ends. And then let veg continue.
Lol Hippie has so much knowledge tucked away.

Can you slow down a bit after you lay them out after the third node? I am with you for sure till there. But idk what else you are chopping and when. I think you mean once it branches after the first chop then you chop again as a mainline?
 
Yeah, I'm stuck away from the plants for a week at a time and when I left it was way different weather. My room is temperamental with the heater so I left if off out of fear of frying everything. I started this setup in the summer so I'm just starting to use the heat for the first time. Poor babies all chilly and high rh..sigh πŸ˜•
 
Lol Hippie has so much knowledge tucked away.

Can you slow down a bit after you lay them out after the third node? I am with you for sure till there. But idk what else you are chopping and when. I think you mean once it branches after the first chop then you chop again as a mainline?
Hippie Dude, pictures pretty please? :-)
 
Yeah, I'm stuck away from the plants for a week at a time and when I left it was way different weather. My room is temperamental with the heater so I left if off out of fear of frying everything. I started this setup in the summer so I'm just starting to use the heat for the first time. Poor babies all chilly and high rh..sigh πŸ˜•
Is there someone who can stop in on them if needed?
 
If we’re still talking about autos, after my experience I don’t believe I’ll ever top an auto again and instead LST. Let alone mainline an auto.

my last run chocolate skunk auto (topped)
653C1836 B894 4B06 8D5D 609AA0F3589D

And my Seedsman northern lights LST’d
4972836A DF61 4E2E 9598 1F52A5C876C9


stealth edit: these pictures are old, just trying to help compare.
 
I think mine were all about poor genetics though.

As MHippie pointed out, all about poor genetics.

I'd be really interested to see the response that a pure ruderalis has to topping... although that, too, might open up a can of worms and beg the question of...
If ruderalis really is an indica variety/strain that acclimated to harsh northern (or high elevation) climates, will they then have the chance to express those indica traits when given the appropriate conditions..? And, thusly, fuck up this whole hypothetical situation I have in my stoned-ass brain..? πŸ€”πŸ€”

Sorry to dive into this in your journal amekins...
 
As MHippie pointed out, all about poor genetics.

I'd be really interested to see the response that a pure ruderalis has to topping... although that, too, might open up a can of worms and beg the question of...
If ruderalis really is an indica variety/strain that acclimated to harsh northern (or high elevation) climates, will they then have the chance to express those indica traits when given the appropriate conditions..? And, thusly, fuck up this whole hypothetical situation I have in my stoned-ass brain..? πŸ€”πŸ€”

Sorry to dive into this in your journal amekins...
No worries here. It’s all information and experience.
 
Page 7 of 64 · Replies 121–140 of 1,262
Back
Top Bottom