I will advocate for cmh tho over most lighting. It turns out most potent, fragrant buds as a stand-alone that this ol bastard has ever had.
For example, buddy bought a nanolux 315 vert cmh fixture. 3 bills. Throws a phili Agro bulb in.. 1 Hundo.. damn tho does that thing seem overkill I’m a 3x3. Would cover 4x4 no prob. Now tell me.. 315 watts and 400 bucks later and your yanking an lb of best weed you’ve ever grown out of a 4x4.. one fixture (runs so cool you can have your hand an inch from the bulb and not even hot.)
LEDs have come a long way and I like them. What’s not to like,?
Just heads up tho, hid is not dead and that tech hasn’t stood still neither. Still, companies are working hps and mh even improving. Seems crazy but ceramic hps could be cool is they cut out all that heat in the spectrum somehow.
i really appreciate this conversation! i loved finding out about the improvements in metal halides--ceramic and way less heat and electric pull than the old ones, no ballasts. because all i really know is lumens and using halides for veg and HPS for flowering, it sounds like ceramic mh is broader spectrum and from what you're able to yield from 315 watts, they're WAY better light intensity than back in the day. having a vertical light is huge--in fact, all that lit review i've done today makes it clear that LEDs really need to be placed sub-canopy in addition to horizontally over the canopy. the research seems to be saying that just good canopy penetration from above isn't good enough if we're going for this next-level super dialed-in PAR optimization.
several of my friends agree with you that the cmh is best. they swear by gavitas--and haven't liked the LED results. i bought a 1000 watt
gavita because some of them were so adamantly against LEDs.
HOWEVER, alot of people here in Humboldt are CRAZY set in their ways--and by crazy i mean deluded by ignorance and arrogance. so it's very likely i'll be more than happy with the LEDs--or not!
now i have to rant just a little, don't mind me. many people here simply won't listen to new information nor to old knowledge. i still have to fight all the time with people who are great growers but will go to their grave refusing to believe that their organic fertilizers still break down into N, P, and fucking K--ORGANIC (as in naturally occurring) CHEMICALS. it makes me insane! the rivers in humboldt have such high nutrient loads that dogs routinely die from swimming in them. people refuse to believe their organic nutrients are the source! "oh i don't use chemicals--i'm organic." NITROGEN IS FUCKING NITROGEN. (and what about all those pesticides and fungicides and mitecides??). people like that don't believe my nutrients are just in their elemental form--and
TechnaFlora uses very little fossil fuel-based sources (which is the primary reason for organic fertilizers IMO--unless you're in the same soil beds year after year). i want them in their elemental form because they are immediately available for uptake AND i can control my nutrient ratios and levels and my soil pH!!! i used to fight with my outdoor grow partner relentlessly about this. just two years of dealing with large outdoor sites here and i'm DONE. Some older people and I joke that we're in the middle of Humboldt County and we have to grow our own weed to get what we want! Alot of people here need to, in my opinion, JUST SHUT UP AND GROW BETTER WEED. THANK GOD FOR THE RISE OF 'LIGHT DEP' (LMAO).
And on all that, I'll remain a bitch thank you. :( Sorry for the rant...