G
gettogro
- 472
- 143
Thanks for the replies.
I do not sell growing systems.
I was not sure what the "benefit" of the UC was, that is why I started this thread. Apparently it takes a step (or three) backwards from simpler hydro systems in terms of yield, adds complexity and greater opportunities for failure, while providing the benefit or a more intimate hobbyist experience and fewer plants. The hobbyist does not care if a run blows up, does not mind if his yield to power consumption is poor- it is his hobby.
This is fine, I get it now. I initially had hoped that the new RDWC would open the door to greater yields and be a more efficient method of growing. It clearly is not.
I appreciate your replies.
Thanks for the replies.
I do not sell growing systems.
I was not sure what the "benefit" of the UC was, that is why I started this thread. Apparently it takes a step (or three) backwards from simpler hydro systems in terms of yield, adds complexity and greater opportunities for failure, while providing the benefit or a more intimate hobbyist experience and fewer plants. The hobbyist does not care if a run blows up, does not mind if his yield to power consumption is poor- it is his hobby.
This is fine, I get it now. I initially had hoped that the new RDWC would open the door to greater yields and be a more efficient method of growing. It clearly is not.
I appreciate your replies.
Thanks for the replies.
I do not sell growing systems.
I was not sure what the "benefit" of the UC was, that is why I started this thread. Apparently it takes a step (or three) backwards from simpler hydro systems in terms of yield, adds complexity and greater opportunities for failure, while providing the benefit or a more intimate hobbyist experience and fewer plants. The hobbyist does not care if a run blows up, does not mind if his yield to power consumption is poor- it is his hobby.
This is fine, I get it now. I initially had hoped that the new RDWC would open the door to greater yields and be a more efficient method of growing. It clearly is not.
I appreciate your replies.
Is this guy for real?? :dull
Why so hostile?
We don't all have the time to write --let alone to read -- 69 page treatises on nutrient profiles and cloning techniques all day on the interweb.
I asked UC owners how they were pulling and how often they blew up,
You guys have mediocre to average yields and blow up often - confirmed.
Gettogro has awesome looking plants, but ten days ago in his own journal he was going to scrap his whole run due to root rot. Several days, hundreds of dollars in potions, and after a 27 step tea brewing process, he MAY have saved his run. He's been doing this for a while, yet he still sees the UC as a constant "educational process" that he may find interesting but I do not have the time for. This is the story I see often with the UC.
I hear vague "UC rocks" "Your plants are awesome" "2gpw is the new standard", but the actual results you can demonstrate are inferior to ebb and grow systems or individual bubble buckets!
I understand that people who spend inordinate amounts of time at something, or large sums of money on something, have a bias towards thinking it is great. In that regard the UC should satisfy you tremendously.
For those of you on the fence, I hope this thread is illustrative.
People like us putting in work and reading thousands and thousands posts doing the trial and error, pave the way for people to follow. Everything I have learned about growing has come from forums like this and I am very thankfull for the people before me that I have learned from. If you dont like hydroponics or dont want to learn, step aside butch...
Is there any benefits of growing in a grow tent versus building a room and wrapping it with mylar material?
Is there any benefits of growing in a grow tent versus building a room and wrapping it with mylar material?
Damn reggie is right. His total absence of pics, evidence, logic, or ability to follow an argument really set me strait.
I should throw this all away.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?