1diesel1
- Posts
- 11,519
- Reactions
- 42,644
- Joined
- May 14, 2016
- Points
- 438
Then it’s $1100
If I’m going to pull the trigger on 4 of these inquiry minds want to no
Only 20% power saving over the hps.If I’m going to pull the trigger on 4 of these inquiry minds want to no
See now if I had the time that you have I would get a lot more done and save a ton of money.see now for that purchase i would email each company and see why they say i should buy theirs and then compare pros and cons. The numbers wont be the issue.
Only 20% power saving over the hps.
I don’t think upfront cost would be worth it, but I’m not running a commercial op.
They would pay for themselves in 6 months of flower and much more after that.Only 20% power saving over the hps.
I don’t think upfront cost would be worth it, but I’m not running a commercial op.
See now if I had the time that you have I would get a lot more done and save a ton of money.
No time,you could have emailed all the companies in the time we posted here.
And i put in my 20 years brother. ;-)
What’s my savings?
Changing from de to led compatible?
4-1000w de with 4 tons a/c
To 4 led from above bad word (gavita)
I want that # per month in watts
And a/c savings:)
But then there’s no led argument!gavita has people who will answer that.
Also they are not publishing a spectrum on this one and from some of the pictures, it appears they are using different shades lenses on the diodes. I can only assume this is because they are trying to get a spectrum every similar to an HPS. The size and density of the buds is drastically different from HPS and LED. Personally I prefer the look of buds grown under HPS.The 1900e is designed to be a direct replacement for an HPS fixture. The watts usage is Up verses the 1700e because of a few things
#1. The actual diode layout of the fixture is small and requires directional placement of the diodes to get the foot print.
#2. There are less diodes on the 1900e, Gavita is using higher wattage diodes I believe to allow the fixture to be hung at the same height at the original HPS fixture.
If I was in the market for the 1900 I think I might wait for the second model to come out. I am presently running the 1650E and the 1700E. The 1700E is a better light than the 1650. The 1650 was around for less than a year.
Veg and early flower 60 - 70%, mid flower 55 -60%, late flower 45 - 50%. Been below minus 40 here for a week now. Temps holding steady. Flower is currently inactive, veg 27 day, 23 night (Celc) nursery is holding 25.5 steady 24/0What humidity you led guys run your tents in flower?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?